Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Dimitrakopoulos, Dionyssis G. (2003)
Publisher: Griffith Law School
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: polsoc
How do institutions of the European Union change? Using an institutionalist approach, this article highlights the interplay between power, cognitive limits, and the normative order that underpins institutional settings and assesses their impact upon the process of institutional change. Empirical evidence from recent attempts to reinforce the protection of the free movement of goods in the EU suggests that, under conditions of uncertainty, actors with ambiguous preferences assess attempts at institutional change on the basis of the historically defined normative order which holds a given institutional structure together. Hence, path dependent and incremental change occurs even when more ambitious and functionally superior proposals are on offer.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alston, Lee J., Thráinn Eggertsson & Douglass C. North (eds.) (1996). Empirical Studies in Institutional Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Armstrong, Kenneth & Simon Bulmer (1998). The Governance of the Single European Market. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    • Aspinwall, Mark D. & Gerald Schneider (2000). Same menu, separate tables: The institutionalist turn in political science and the study of European integration, European Journal of Political Research 38: 1-36.
    • Bardach, Eugene (1977). The Implementation Game: What Happens After a Bill Becomes a Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Braybrooke, David & Charles E. Lindblom (1963). A Strategy of Decision: Policy Evaluation as a Social Process. New York: Free Press.
    • _____ (1997). Institution - Macht - Repräsentation: Wofür politische Institutionen stehen und wie sie wirken. Baden- Baden: Nomos.
    • Hall, Peter A. & Rosemary C. R. Taylor (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms, Political Studies 44: 936-957.
    • Jupille, J. & J. A. Caporaso (1999). Institutionalism and the European Union: International relations and comparative politics, Annual Review of Political Science 2: 429-444.
    • Kerremans, Bart (1996). Do institutions make a difference? Non-institutionalism, neoinstitutionalism, and the logic of common decision-making in the European Union, Governance 9: 217-240.
    • Knill, Christoph & Andrea Lenschow (2000). “Seek and Ye Shall Find!” Linking Different Perspectives on Institutional Change. Preprint 2000/6. Bonn: Max-Planck-Projektgruppe Recht der Gemeinshcaftgüter.
    • Krasner, Stephen D. (1984). Approaches to the state. Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics, Comparative Politics 16: 223-246.
    • _____ (1988). Sovereignty: An institutional perspective, Comparative Political Studies 21: 66-94.
    • Kratochwil, Friedrich V. (1989). Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Levi, Margaret (1990). A logic of institutional change. In: K. Schweers Cook & M. Levi (eds.) The Limits of Rationality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Louis, Jean-Victor (1990). L'Ordre Juridique Communautaire. 5th ed. Bruxelles/Luxembourg: OPOCE.
    • Lowi, Theodore J. (1964). American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory, World Politics 16: 677-715.
    • _____ (1972). Four systems of policy, politics and choice, Public Administration Review 32: 298-310.
    • March, James G. 1994. A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. New York: Free Press.
    • March, James G. & Johan P. Olsen. 1976. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
    • _____ & _____. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.
    • _____ & _____. 1998. The institutional dynamics of international political orders, International Organization 52: 943-969.
    • March, James G., Martin Schulz & Xueguang Zhou (2000). The Dynamics of Rules: Change in Written Organizational Codes. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    • Mattera, A. (1999). Un instrument d'intervention rapide pour sauvegarder l'unicité du Marché intérieur: le Règlement 2679/98. Revue du Marché Unique Européen (2): 9-33.
    • Merton, Robert K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action, American Sociological Review 1: 894-904.
    • Muller, Pierre (1995). Les politiques publiques comme construction d'un rapport au monde. In: A. Faure, G. Pollet & Ph. Warin (eds.) La Construction du Sens dans les Politiques Publiques: Débats autour de la Notion de Référentiel. Paris: L'Harmattan.
    • Nedelmann, Birgitta (1995). Gegensätze und Dynamik politischer Institutionen, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 35 (Sonderheft): 15-40.
    • North, Douglass C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Orlandini, Giovanni (2000). The free movement of goods as a possibly 'Community' limitation on industrial conflict, European Law Journal 6: 341-362.
    • Pierson, Paul (1996). The path to European integration. A historical institutionalist analysis, Comparative Political Studies 29: 123-163.
    • _____ (2000a). Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics, American Political Science Review 94: 251-267.
    • _____ (2000b). The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change, Governance 13: 475-499.
    • Pollack, Mark A. (1996). The new institutionalism and EC governance: The promise and limits of institutional analysis, Governance 9: 429-458.
    • Powell, Walter W. & Paul J. DiMaggio (eds.) (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Pressman, Jeffrey L. & Aaron Wildavsky (1973). Implementation. How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    • Rideau, Joël (1972). Le rôle des états membres dans l'application du droit communautaire, Annuaire Français de Droit International 18: 864-903.
    • Sandholtz, Wayne & Alec Stone Sweet (eds.) (1998). European Integration and Supranational Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Schneider, Gerald & Mark Aspinwall (eds.) (2001). The Rules of Integration: Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    • Simon, Herbert A. (1947). Administrative Behavior. New York: Macmillan.
    • Skowronek, Stephen (1982). Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities 1877-1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Starck, Christian (1995). Die Flexibilität rechtlicher Institutionen, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 35 (Sonderheft): 41-53.
    • Steinmo, Sven, Kathleen Thelen & Frank Longstreth (eds.) (1992). Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Waschkuhn, Arno (1987). Allgemeine Institutionentheorie als Rahmen für die Theorie politischer Institutionen. In: G. Göhler (ed.) Grundfragen der Theorie politscher Institutionen: Forschungsstand - Probleme - Perspektiven. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article