Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Newman, Roger; Long, T
Publisher: Scientific and Academic Publishing
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: health_and_wellbeing
This was the first study to compare acute dysphagia service provision directly between the UK and the US. It examined variations in acute dysphagia services between the UK and the US, determined clinicians’ perceptions of their own service and that of their transatlantic counterparts, and elicited the reason for variation. An online survey was distributed to randomly-allocated teaching hospitals in the UK and the US, and speech and language therapists working with acute dysphagia responded anonymously via an automated system. Content analysis was employed to convert free-text responses to numeric data, and then this and existing numeric responses were subjected to descriptive statistical analysis. Variability was high, with the US having on average 0.95 whole time equivalent more clinicians per hospital than the UK. This resulted in an increased number of new patients examined and increased frequency of review of existing patients compared to the UK. In contrast, the UK had significantly increased waiting times with no patient being assessed on the same day as referral (compared to 63.6% of US responses). Notable variation was also seen in objective or instrumental assessment, with most US patients receiving videofluoroscopy or fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (compared to only one UK hospital). Finance was found to be at the root of the variation. However, the more extensive US service was found to be more cost-effective.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • “Swallowing Function After Stroke: Prognosis and Prognostic Factors at 6 M onths” Stroke, vol.30, no.4, pp.744-748, 1999
    • Carol A Smith Hammond and Larry B Goldstein, “Cough and Aspiration of Food and Liquids Due to Oral-Pharyngeal Dysphagia: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines” Chest, vol.129[Suppl.1] pp.154S-168S, 2006 Bronwyn Jones “Normal and Abnormal Swallowing: Imaging in Diagnosis and Therapy” Springer: New York, 2003
    • Ralf-Joachim Schulz, RolfNieczaj, AlmutM oll, et al., “Dysphagia Treatment in a Clinical-Ger iatric Setting PEG and Functional Therapy of Dysphagia” Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Ger iatrie, vol.42, no.4, pp328-35, 2009 Stephanie K Daniels, Colleen P M cAdam, Kevin Brailey, et al., “Clinical Assessment of Swallowing and Prediction of Dysphagia Severity” American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, vol.6, no.4, pp.17-23, 1997
    • JoAnne Robbins, James L Coyle, John C Rosenbek, et al., “Differentiation of Normal and Abnormal Airway Protection During Swallowing Using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale” Dysphagia, vol.14, no.4, pp.228-232, 1999
    • [10] Elaine T M iller “Rehabilitation Nursing's Responsibility in Shaping the Future U.S. Health System” Rehabilitation Nursing, vol.33, no.6, p.230, 2008
    • [11] Ronald D Wenger “Does the US Have the Best Health Care System in the World?” Bulletin of the American College of Sur geons, July pp.8-15, 2009
    • [12] World Health Organisation “Health Systems: Improving Performance” WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000
    • [13] Online Available: http://admin.cms2005.com/docServer.aspx ?f=NTc0Nzk3M DE 0Policy%20Survey%20in%20Seven%20Countries/28662_D SQ_Final_070607%20pdf.pdf
    • [17] Tony Delamonthe “How the NHS M easures Up” British M edical Journal, vol.336, pp.1469-1471, 2008
    • [18] Claire Bateman, Paula Leslie and M ichael J Drinnan “Adult Dysphagia Assessment in the UK and Ireland: Are SLTs Assessing the Same Factors?” Dysphagia, vol.22, no.3, pp174−186, 2007
    • [19] Barbara A M athers−Schmidt and M ary Kurlinski “Dysphagia Evaluation Practices: Inconsistencies in Clinical Assessment and Instrumental Examination Decision−M aking” Dysphagia, vol.18, no.2, pp.114−125, 2003
    • [20] Dolores E Battle “The Education of Speech-Language Pathologists in the United States of America” Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, vol.58, pp.7-13, 2006
    • [21] Jeri A. Logemann “Preparation of Speech-Language Pathologists in the United States: The M aster's Degree” Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, vol.58, pp.55-58, 2006
    • [22] Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists “Communicating Quality 3” RCSLT, London, UK, 2003
    • [23] Adam Oliver and Don Nutbeam “Addressing Health Inequalities in the United Kingdom: A Case Study” Journal of Public Health M edicine, vol.25, pp.281-7, 2003
    • [24] Dennis Raphael and Toba Bryant “The State's Role in Promoting Health: Public Health Concerns in Canada, USA, UK, and Sweden” Health Policy, vol.78, pp.39-55, 2006
    • [25] Roger D Newman “Videofluoroscopy” In: Julie M Nightingale, Robert A. Law (Eds.) “Gastrointestinal Tract Imaging: An Evidence-Bas ed Practice Guide” Elsevier, UK, 2010
    • [26] Alyssa Banotai “Exercis e Science and Dysphagia Therapy” Advance, vol.20, no.12, pp.7-9, 2010
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article