LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Westbrook, C. D.; Illingworth, A. J. (2013)
Publisher: Royal Meteorological Society
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Identifiers:doi:10.1002/qj.2096
This article focuses on the characteristics of persistent thin single-layer mixed-phase clouds. We seek to answer two important questions: (i) how does ice continually nucleate and precipitate from these clouds, without the available ice nuclei becoming depleted? (ii) how do the supercooled liquid droplets persist in spite of the net flux of water vapour to the growing ice crystals? These questions are answered quantitatively using in situ and radar observations of a long-lived mixed-phase cloud layer over the Chilbolton Observatory.\ud \ud Doppler radar measurements show that the top 500 m of cloud (the top 250 m of which is mixed-phase, with ice virga beneath) is turbulent and well-mixed, and the liquid water content is adiabatic. This well-mixed layer is bounded above and below by stable layers. This inhibits entrainment of fresh ice nuclei into the cloud layer, yet our in situ and radar observations show that a steady flux of ≈100 m−2s−1 ice crystals fell from the cloud over the course of ∼1 day. Comparing this flux to the concentration of conventional ice nuclei expected to be present within the well-mixed layer, we find that these nuclei would be depleted within less than 1 h. We therefore argue that nucleation in these persistent supercooled clouds is strongly time-dependent in nature, with droplets freezing slowly over many hours, significantly longer than the few seconds residence time of an ice nucleus counter.\ud \ud Once nucleated, the ice crystals are observed to grow primarily by vapour deposition, because of the low liquid water path (21 g m−2) yet vapour-rich environment. Evidence for this comes from high differential reflectivity in the radar observations, and in situ imaging of the crystals. The flux of vapour from liquid to ice is quantified from in situ measurements, and we show that this modest flux (3.3 g m−2h−1) can be readily offset by slow radiative cooling of the layer to space.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ansmann A et al. 2009. Evolution of the ice phase in tropical altocumulus: SAMUM lidar observations over Cape Verde J. Geophys. Res. 114 D17208
    • Baldwin MP and Vonnegut B 1982. Automatic apparatus for nucleation investigations. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 53 1911-1914
    • Barlow TW and Haymet ADJ et al. 1995. ALTA: an automated lag-time apparatus for studying nucleation of supercooled liquids. Rev. Sci. Inst. 66 2996-3007
    • Bergeron T 1935. On the physics of clouds and precipitation Proces Verbaux de l2˘018Association de Mtorologie Lisbon, Portugal, International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics, 156-178.
    • Bouniol D, Illingworth AJ and Hogan RJ, 2003. Deriving turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate within clouds using ground based 94GHz radar. Proc. 31 AMS Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Seattle 192-196
    • Brenguier JL, 1991. Paramaterization of the condensation process: a theoretical approach. J. Atmos. Sci. 48 264-282
    • Broadley SL et al. 2012. Immersion mode heterogeneous ice nucleation by an illite rich powder representative of atmospheric mineral dust. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12 287-307
    • Crosier J et al.. 2011. Observations of ice multiplications in a weakly convective cell embedded in supercooled mid-level stratus. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11 257-273.
    • de Boer G et al.. 2011. Evidence of liquid-dependent ice nucleation in high-latitude stratiform clouds from surface remote sensors. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38 L01803.
    • DeMott PJ et al.. 2010. Predicting global atmospheric ice nuclei distribution and their impacts on climate. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 107 11217-22.
    • Field PR. 2004: Simultaneous radar and aircraft observations of mixedphase cloud at the 100-m-scale. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 130 1877- 1904.
    • Field PR. Heymsfield AJ, Bansemer A, 2006: Shattering and Particle Interarrival Times Measured by Optical Array Probes in Ice Clouds. J. Atmos. & Ocean. Tech. 23 1357-1371.
    • Fridlind A et al. 2012. A FIRE-ACE/SHEBA case study of mixed-phase Arctic boundary-layer clouds: Entrainment rate limitations on rapid primary ice nucleation processes. J. Atmos. Sci. 69 365-389.
    • Goddard JWF, Eastment JD and Thurai M 1994. The Chilbolton Advanced Meteorological Radar: a tool for multidisciplinary atmospheric research. Electron. & Comm. Eng. J. 6 77-86.
    • Hall MPM, Goddard JWF and Cherry SM 1984. Identification of hydrometeors and other targets by dual-polarization radar Radio Sci. 19 132-140
    • Heneghan et al. 2001. Liquid-to-Crystal Nucleation: Automated LagTime Apparatus to study supercooled liquids. J. Chem. Phys. 115 7599
    • Heneghan et al. 2002. Nucleation of Supercooled Water: new apparatus to determine stochastic behavior. J. Chem. Phys. 117 5319-5327.
    • Heneghan et al. 2002. Statistics of heterogeneous nucleation of supercooled water, and the effect of an added catalyst. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 99 9631-9634
    • Heymsfield AJ and M Kajikawa 1987: An Improved Approach to Calculating Terminal Velocities of Plate-like Crystals and Graupel. J. Atmos. Sci. 44 1088-1099.
    • Hogan RJ et al. 2002. Properties of embedded convection in warmfrontal mixed-phase cloud from aircraft and polarimetric radar Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 128 451-476
    • Hogan RJ et al. 2003. Characteristics of mixed-phase clouds: Part I: Lidar, radar and aircraft observations from CLARE'98. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 129 2089-2116.
    • Hogan RJ et al. 2004. Estimating the global distribution of supercooled liquid water clouds using spaceborne lidar. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32 L05106.
    • Hogan RJ et al. 2006. The retrieval of ice water content from radar reflectivity factor and temperature and its use in the evaluation of a mesoscale model J. Appl. Met. & Clim. 45 301-317
    • Hogan RJ et al. 2012. Radar scattering from ice aggregates using the horizontally aligned oblate spheroid approximation. J. Appl. Met. & Clim. 51 655-671.
    • Illingworth AJ et al. 2007. Cloudnet - continuous evaluation of cloud profiles in seven operational models using ground-based observations. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 88 883-898.
    • Isaac GA and RH Douglas 1972: Another ”time-lag” in the activation of atmospheric ice nuclei. J. Appl. Meteorol. 11 490-493.
    • Ji W and PK Wang 1999: Ventilation coefficients for falling ice crystals in the atmosphere at low-intermediate Reynolds numbers. J. Atmos. Sci. 56 829-836.
    • Korolev A and Isaac G 2003. Phase transformation of mixed-phase clouds Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 129 19-38
    • Korolev A and Isaac G 2005. Shattering during sampling by OAPs and HVPS J. Atmos. & Ocean. Tech. 22 528-542
    • Korolev A and Field PR 2008.The Effect of Dynamics on Mixed-Phase Clouds: Theoretical Considerations J. Atmos. Sci. 65 66-86
    • Lawson RP et al. 2006. The 2D-S (stereo) probe: design and preliminary tests of a new airborne high-speed, high-resolution particle imaging probe. J. Atmos. & Ocean. Tech. 23 1462-1477
    • Marsham J et al. 2006. Evaluation of a large-eddy model simulation of a mixed-phase altocumulus cloud using microwave radiometer, lidar and Doppler radar data. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 132 1693-1715.
    • Mason BJ 1971. The physics of clouds Oxford University Press, second edition.
    • Murray BJ et al. 2011. Heterogeneous freezing of water droplets containing kaolinite particles. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11 4191-4207.
    • Nicholls S and Leighton J 1986. An observational study of the structure of stratiform cloud sheets: Part I. Structure. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 112 431-460
    • Niedermeir D et al. 2011. Heterogeneous ice nucleation: exploring the transition from stochastic to singular freezing behaviour. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11 8767-8775.
    • Rauber RM and Tokay A 1991. An explanation for the existence of supercooled liquid water at the top of cold clouds. J. Atmos. Sci. 48 1005-1023.
    • Pruppacher HR and Klett JD 1997. Microphysics of clouds and precipitation, Second edition, Kluwer, London.
    • Shupe MD et al. 2011. Clouds at arctic atmospheric observatories. Part I: occurrence and macrophysical properties. J. Appl. Meteorol. & Clim. 50 626-643
    • Smith AJ et al. 2009. Processes that generate and deplete liquid water and snow in thin midlevel mixed-phase clouds. J. Geophys. Res. 114 D12203
    • Stevens B et al. 2002. Entrainment in stratocumulus-topped mixed layers. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 128 2663-2690
    • Vali G and Stansbury EJ 1966. Time-dependent characteristics of the heterogeneous nucleation of ice. Canadian J. Phys. 44 477-502
    • Vali G 1994. Freezing rate due to heterogeneous nucleation. J. Atmos. Sci. 51 1843-1856
    • Vali G 2008. Repeatability and randomness in heterogeneous freezing nucelation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8 5017-5031
    • Vonnegut B 1948. Variation with temperature of the nucleation rate of supercooled liquid tin and water drops. J. Colloid Sci. 3 563-569.
    • Vonnegut B 1949. Nucleation of supercooled water clouds by silver iodide smokes. Chem. Rev. 44 277-289.
    • Vonnegut B. and Baldwin MP, 1984. Repeated Nucleation of a Supercooled Water Sample that Contains Silver Iodide Particles. J. Appl. Meteorol. 23 486-490
    • Westbrook CD, Hogan RJ and Illingworth AJ 2008. The capacitance of pristine ice crystals and aggregate snowflakes. J. Atmos. Sci. 65 206- 209.
    • Westbrook CD and Davies OT 2010. Observations of glaciating holepunch cloud. Weather 65 176-180.
    • Westbrook CD et al. 2010a. Doppler lidar measurements of oriented planar ice crystals falling from supercooled and glaciated layer clouds. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 136 260-276.
    • Westbrook CD et al. 2010b. Estimates of drizzle drop size and precipitation rate using two-colour lidar measurements. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 3 671-681.
    • Westbrook CD and Illingworth AJ 2011. Evidence that ice forms primarily in supercooled liquid clouds at temperatures > −27◦C. Geophys. Res. Lett. 65 176-180.
    • Wilson PW and Haymet ADJ 2009. Effect of solutes on the heterogeneous nucleation temperature of supercooled water: an experimental determination. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11 2679-2682
    • Zhang D, Wang Z and Liu D 2010. A global view of mid-level liquid-layer topped stratiform cloud distribution and phase partition from CALIPSO and CloudSat measurements J. Geophys. Res. 115 D00H13
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article