Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Teinaki, Vicky; Montgomery, Bruce; Spencer, Nick; Cockton, Gilbert (2012)
Publisher: School of Design, Victoria University of Wellington
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects: W200

Classified by OpenAIRE into

How well can designers communicate qualities of touch? \ud This paper presents evidence that they have some capability to do so, much of which appears to have been learned, but at present make limited use of such language. Interviews with graduate designer-makers suggest that they are aware of and value the importance of touch and materiality in their work, but lack a vocabulary to fully relate to their detailed explanations of other aspects such as their intent or selection of materials. We believe that more attention should be paid to the verbal dialogue that happens in the design process, particularly as other researchers show that even making-based learning also has a strong verbal element to it. However, verbal language alone does not appear to be adequate for a comprehensive language of touch. Graduate designers-makers’ descriptive practices combined non-verbal manipulation within verbal accounts. We thus argue that haptic vocabularies do not simply describe material qualities, but rather are situated competences that physically demonstrate the presence of haptic qualities. Such competencies are more important than groups of verbal vocabularies in isolation. Design support for developing and extending haptic competences must take this wide range of considerations into account to comprehensively improve designers’ capabilities.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [24] Fine, G.A. (2008). Kitchens: The Culture of Restaurant Work, Updated with a New Preface (p. 328). Berkeley: University of California Press.
    • [25] Sonneveld, M. (2004), Close encounters of the !rst kind: Meet the material world. In D. McDonagh, P. Hekkert, van Erp, J., & D. Gyi, (Eds). Design and Emotion: The Experience of Everyday Things. (pp. 436-437). London: Taylor & Francis.
    • [26] Ashlock, J. (2007). What can brown do for you? I.D. Magazine. Retrieved June 7, 2007, from http://www.idonline. com/features/feature.asp?id=1575
    • [27] van Halen, C., Vezzoli, C., & Wimmer, R. (2005). Methodology for Product Service System Innovation. Assen: Koninklijke van Gorcum.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article