LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Pina Sanchez, J (2014)
Publisher: Spanish Association of Political Science and Public Administration (AECPA)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Most measures of political decentralization seem to capture only specific facets of the concept. In particular, the excessive dependence on fiscal indicators has often been criticized since they seem unable to assess the degree of autonomy exerted by subnational governments. On the other hand, efforts directed at developing more encompassing indexes have had to rely on the aggregation of items developed by experts, a process that is prone to idiosyncratic errors. In this paper I propose the development of a measurement framework using a Bayesian factor analysis model for mixed ordinal and continuous outcomes. This model can efficiently combine multiple measures of decentralization regardless of their level of measurement, and in this way make use of both the rigour of fiscal indicators and the wider coverage of qualitative indicators. Applying this model to a set of 14 indicators I elaborate a more encompassing index of decentralization for 33 OECD countries. In order to illustrate the importance of using non-partial measures of decentralization, I use this index to replicate parts of De Mello and Barenstein (2001) exploratory analysis regarding the relationship between decentralization and corruption, showing that such relationship is practically non-existent.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Arzaghi, Mohammad and Vernon Henderson. 2005. “Why Countries Are Fiscally Decentralizing”, Journal of Public Economics, 89: 1157-1189.
    • Brancati, Dawn. 2006. “Decentralization: Fueling the Fire or Dampening the Flames of Ethnic Conflict and Secessionism?”, International Organization, 60: 651-685.
    • De Mello, Luiz and Matias Barenstein. 2001. “Fiscal Decentralization and Governance: A Cross-Country Analysis”, IZA Discussion Paper, 5647.
    • Díaz-Serrano, Luis and Andrés Rodríguez-Pose. 2011. “Decentralization, Happiness and the Perception of Institutions”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2021, Available at: http://www.iza.org/en/webcontent/publications/papers/viewAbstract?dp_ id=5647 [Accessed: 15 November, 2013].
    • Dillinger, William. 1994. Decentralization and Its Implications for Urban Service Delivery. Urban Management Programme Discussion Paper 16, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
    • Dunson, David D. 2000. “Bayesian latent variable models for clustered mixed outcomes”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 62: 355- 366.
    • Ebel, Robert D. and Serdar Yilmaz. 2002. “On the Measurement and Impact of Fiscal Decentralization”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2809.
    • Elazar, Daniel J. 1995. “From Statism To Federalism: A Paradigm Shift”, Publius, 25: 5-18.
    • Faguet, Jean P. 2004. “Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs? Evidence from Bolivia”, Journal of Public Economics, 88: 867-893.
    • Fan, Simon, Chen Lin and Daniel Treisman. 2009. “Political Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence from around the World”, Journal of Public Economics, 99: 14-34.
    • Freille, Sebastian, Mohammad E. Haque and Richard A. Kneller. 2008. Federalism, decentralisation and corruption. Available at: http://www.cepr.org/meets/wkcn/6/6675/ papers/FreilleFinal.pdf [Accessed: 16 May 2012].
    • Fisman, Raymond and Roberta Gatti. 2002. “Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence across Countries. Journal of Public Economics”, 83: 325-345.
    • Gil, Carlos C., Pedro Pascual A. and Manuel Rapun G. 2004. “Regional Economic Disparities and Decentralisation”, Urban Studies, 41: 71-94.
    • Gurgur, Turgur and Anwar Shah. 2005. “Localization and Corruption: Panacea or Pandora's Box?”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3486.
    • Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks and Arjan H. Schakel. 2008. “Operationalizing Regional Authority: A Coding Scheme for 42 countries, 1950-2006”, Regional and Federal Studies, 18: 123-142.
    • Høyland, Bjørn, Karl Moene and Fredrik Willumsen. 2012. “The Tyranny of International Index Rankings”, Journal of Development Economics, 97: 1-14.
    • Hutchcroft, Paul D. 2001. “Centralization and Decentralization in Administration and Politics: Assessing Territorial Dimensions of Authority and Power”, Governance, 14: 23-53.
    • Huther, Jeff and Anwar Shah. 1998. “Applying a Simple Measure of Good Governance to the Debate on Fiscal Decentralization”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 1894.
    • Jackman, Simon. 2002. “Annexe 3. Note méthodologique”, in Gérard Grunberg, Nonna Mayerdu and Paul N. Sniderman, (eds.), La démocratie à l'épreuve: Une nouvelle approche de l'opinion des Français, Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
    • Jackman, Simon. 2004. “What Do We Learn from Graduate Admissions Committees? A Multiple Rater, Latent Variable Model, with Incomplete Discrete and Continuous Indicators”, Political Analysis, 12: 400-424.
    • Levendusky, Matthew S., Jeremy C. Pope and Simon Jackman. 2008. “Measuring DistrictLevel Partisanship with Implications for the Analysis of US Elections”, The Journal of Politics, 70: 736-753.
    • Loehlin, John C. 2004. Latent Variable Models: an introduction to factor, path, and structural equation models, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Lunn, David J., Andrew Thomas, Nicky Best and David Spiegelhalter. 2000. “WinBUGSA Bayesian modeling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility”, Statistics and Computing, 10: 325-337.
    • Marks, Gary, Liesbet Hooghe and Arjan H. Schakel. 2008. “Measuring Regional Authority”, Regional and Federal Studies, 18: 111-121.
    • Oates, Wallace E. 1999. “An Essay on Fiscal Federalism”, American Economic Association, 37: 1120-1149.
    • Palomo, Jesus, David Dunson and Ken Bollen. 2005. “Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling” in Lee, Sik-Yum (ed.), Handbook of Latent Variable and Related Models, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    • Pemstein, Daniel, Stephen Meserve and James Melton. 2010. “Democratic Compromise: A Latent Variable Analysis of Ten Measures of Regime Type”, Political Analysis, 18: 426-449.
    • Quinn, Kevin M. 2004. “Bayesian Factor Analysis for Mixed Ordinal and Continuous Responses”, Political Analysis, 12: 338-353.
    • Rodden, Jonathan. 2004. “Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: On the Meaning and Measurement”, Comparative Politics, 36: 481-500.
    • Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés and Roberto Ezcurra. 2011. Journal of Economic Geography, 11: 619-643.
    • Schakel, Arjan H. 2008. “Validation of the Regional Authority Index”, Regional and Federal Studies, 18: 143-166.
    • Schneider, Aaron. 2003. “Decentralization: Conceptualization and Measurement”, Studies in comparative International Development, 38: 32-56.
    • Shah, Answar. 1999. “Balance, Accountability, and Responsiveness: lessons about Decentralization”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2021.
    • Shah, Answar, Theresa Thompson and Heng-Fu Zou. 2004. The Impact of Decentralisation on service Delivery, Corruption, Fiscal Management and Growth in Developing and Emerging Market Economies: A Synthesis of Empirical Evidence. Dice Report: Journal of International Comparisons, Available at: http://info.worldbank.org/etools/ docs/library/206896/TheImpactofDecentralisation.pdf [Accessed: 15 May, 2011].
    • Sharma, Chanchal K. 2006. “Decentralization Dilemma: Measuring the Degree and Evaluating the Outcomes”, The Indian Journal of Political Sciences. 62: 49-64.
    • Stegarescu, Dan. 2005. “Public Sector Decentralization: Measurement Concepts and Recent International Trends”, Fiscal Studies, 26: 301-333.
    • Thieben, Ulrich. 2001. “Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth in High-Income OECD Countries”, Fiscal Studies, 24: 237-274.
    • Treier, Shawn and Simon Jackman. 2008. Democracy as a Latent Variable. American Journal of Political Science. 52: 201-217.
    • Treisman, Daniel. 2002a. Defining and Measuring Decentralization: A Global Perspective. UCLA Working Paper, Available at: http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/ treisman/Papers/defin.pdf [accessed [Accessed: 08 September 2012].
    • Treisman, Daniel. 2002b. Decentralization and the Quality of Government. UCLA Working Paper. Available at: http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/treisman/Papers/ defin.pdf [Accessed: 08 September 2012].
    • Vo, Hong D. 2010. “The Economics of Fiscal Decentralization”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 24: 657-679.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article