Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Collins, Lee
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: N100, N200
This research investigates the role of sociocultural dimensions in increasing national innovative capacity. While literature focuses on other determinants of innovation output, such as the stock of knowledge and resources dedicated to R&D, dimensions of a cultural nature have yet to be adequately addressed. The investigation examines sociocultural factors in natural resource-rich countries where the urgency to survive is not the primary driver in achieving economic growth. Oil-rich GCC countries, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, have made significant investment in education and information and communications technology to develop their economies. The primary focus in developing the economies has shifted to increasing innovative capacity. This study attempts to determine other factors that need to be in place to achieve increased innovative capacity as measured by new-to-the world knowledge and innovation. Endogenous growth theory and national innovation systems provide the theoretical base for the investigation. A deductive approach will be used to produce hypotheses that will be tested quantitatively, using existing indicators for sociocultural dimensions. Five sociocultural dimensions were found to be significant in innovative capacity when tested in leading innovator countries (Germany, Japan, Sweden, Switzerland, United States), emerging innovator countries (Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Korea), and GCC countries (Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates) as a whole. However, three of the dimensions, Openness to Outside Influences, and Adaptability were unexpectedly inversely proportional to innovative capacity. More precise measurements and further research are required.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Chapter 3 Sociocultural Environment for Innovation ................................................. 61 3.1 Introduction to the Sociocultural Environment ............................................................... 62 Table 6.2 Data Description ................................................................................................ 134
    • Table 6.3 Variable Relationships....................................................................................... 144
    • Table 6.4 Regressions on Resource and Infrastructure Variables Only -  and Sig Values
    • Table 6.5 Regressions on Sociocultural Dimensions and Resource and Infrastructure
    • Variables -  and Sig Values.............................................................................................. 146
    • Table 6.6 Regressions on Reduced Number of Variables -  and Sig Values................... 148
    • Table 6.7 Regression on Reduced Variables for LI and EI Groups -  and Sig Values .... 149
    • Table 6.8 Regression on Reduced Variables GCC Group -  and Sig Values .................. 150 Table 6.9 Determinants of Innovative Capacity - All Countries (Omit F SCX4 Risk Attitude)
    • ............................................................................................................................................ 151 Table 6.10 Determinants of Innovative Capacity - LI and EI Countries (Omit F SCX2
    • Openness in Communication, F SCX4 Risk Attitude).......................................................... 153
    • Table 6.11 Determinants of Innovative Capacity - GCC Countries.................................. 155
    • Table 6.12 Global Index Ratings (out of 100) ................................................................... 157 Girma, S. (2005). Absorptive capacity and productivity spillovers from FDI: A threshold regression analysis. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 281-306.
    • Godin, B. (2008). The Knowledge Economy: Fritz Machlup's Construction of a Synthetic Concept. Montréal: Institut national de la recherche scientifique - Centre Urbanisation Culture Société.
    • Goel, R. K., & Nelson, M. A. (2005). Economic Freedon Versus Political Freedom: Cross-Country Influences on Corruption. Australian Economic Papers, 44(2), 121-133.
    • Gorodnichenko, Y., & Roland, G. (2010). Culture, institutions and the wealth of nations (No. w16368). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    • Granato, J., Inglehart, R., & Leblang, D. (1996). The effect of cultural values on economic development: theory, hypotheses, and some empirical tests. American Journal of Political Science, 607-631.
    • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 1360-1380.
    • Granstrand, O. (1999). The economics and management of intellectual property: Towards intellectual capitalism. Northampton, Mass, 212-236.
    • Granstrand, O. (2005). Innovation and intellectual property rights. The Oxford handbook of innovation, 266-290.
    • Grayling, A. C. (1998). Philosophy 1: A Guide through the Subject. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Graves, S. C., & Jordan, W. C. (1991). Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility.
    • Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Reenen, J. V. (2004). Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), 883-895.
    • Griliches, Zvi. (1990). "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature 28: 1661-1707.
    • Grooteart, C. and Serageldin, I. (2000). Defining Social Capital: An Integrating View. Social capital: a multifaceted perspective. World Bank Publications.
    • Grootaert, C., & Van Bastelaer, T. (2001). Understanding and measuring social capital: a synthesis of findings and recommendations from the social capital initiative. Social Capital Initiative Working Paper, (24).World Bank.
    • Grossman, Gene M. and Helpman, ELhanan. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Gu, S., & Lundvall, B. K. (2006). China's innovation system and the move toward harmonious growth and endogenous innovation. Innovation: management, policy & practice, 8(1), 1-26.
    • Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective Evaluation: Improving the Usefulness of Evalutaion Results through Responsive and Naturalistic Approaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    • Guiso, L., P. Sapienza and L. Zingales. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes?. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20 (2), 23-49.
    • Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. (2009). Basic Econometrics Mc Graw-Hill International Edition.
    • Gujarati, D.N. (2002). Basic Econometrics Mc Graw-Hill.
    • Hall, Robert and Jones, Charles. (1999). Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others? Quarterly Journal of Economics, February 1999, 114(1), pp. 83- 116.
    • Harris, P. R., & Moran, R. T. (1987). Managing cultural differences: High-performance strategies for today's global manager. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.
    • Harrison, A. E. (1994). Productivity, imperfect competition and trade reform: Theory and evidence. Journal of International Economics, 36(1), 53-73.
    • Heard-Bey, Frauke. (1982). From Trucial States to United Arab Emirates. Essex: Longman Group LMT.
    • Hedlund, G. (1994). A model of knowledge management and the N‐ form corporation. Strategic management journal, 15(S2), 73-90.
    • Held, D. (1999). Global transformations: Politics, economics and culture. Stanford University Press.
    • Held, David , McGrew, Anthony, Goldblatt, David, Peratton, Johnathan. (1999) Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    • Helpman, E., & Krugman, P. R. (1985). Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy. The MIT press.
    • Herbig, P., & Dunphy, S. (1998). Culture and innovation. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 5(4), 13-21.
    • Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., Jacobson, D., Laestadius, S., & Smith, K. (2003). Low-tech industries and the knowledge economy: state of the art and research challenges. STEP report, 16.
    • Hobday, Michael. (1995). Innovation in East Asia: The Challenge to Japan. Aldershot, U.K.: Edward Elgar.
    • Hockman, B., & Kostecki, M. (1995). The Political Economy of the World Trading System: From GATT to WTO.
    • Hodgkin, R. (1991). Michael Polanyi - Prophet of life, the universe and everything, Times Higher Educational Supplement, September 27, page 15.
    • Hoexter, M. (1998). Endowments, Rulers, and Community: Waqf Al-騂 aramayn in Ottoman Algiers (Vol. 6). Brill Academic Pub.
    • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). Sage Publications, Incorporated.
    • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). Sage Publications, Incorporated. (Abridged Edition).
    • Holden, M. T. and Lynch, P. (2004). Choosing the Appropriate Methodology: Understanding Research Philosophy. The Marketing Review, 4 (4), pp. 397-409.
    • Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American sociological review, 19-51.
    • Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton University Press.
    • Issacson, Walter. (2011). Steve Jobs. NY: Simon and Schuster.
    • Johannisson, Bengt and Olaison, Lena. (2007, March). The Moment of Truth-Reconstructing Entrepreneurship and Social Capital in the Eye of the Storm. Review of Social Economy, Vol. LXV, NO. 1, pp. 55-78.
    • Jones, C. 1998. Introduction to Economic Growth. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
    • Jorgenson, D. W., Gollop, F. M., & Fraumeni, B. M. (1987). Productivity and US economic growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    • Jorgenson, D. W., & Griliches, Z. (1967). The explanation of productivity change. The Review of Economic Studies, 34(3), 249-283.
    • Juris, Jeffrey S. (2004). Networked social movements. In The network society, ed. Manuel Castells. London: Edward Elgar.
    • Kapur, Devesh. (2001). Diasporas and Technology Transfer. Journal of Human Development 2 (2): 265-86.
    • Kaufer, E. (1989). The economics of the patent system (Vol. 30). Harwood Academic Pub.
    • Kaufmann, D., Kraay,A. and Zoido-Lobatón, P. (2002). Governance Matters II-Updated Indicators for 2000/01, World Bank Policy Research Department Working Paper No. 2772, Washington D.C., 2002.
    • Keller, Wolfgang. (2004, September). International Technology Diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature 42: 752-82.
    • Kendrick, J. W. (1961). Front matter, Productivity Trends in the United States. In Productivity Trends in the United States (pp. 52-0). NBER.
    • Kim, J. I., & Lau, L. J. (1996). The sources of Asian Pacific economic growth. The Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'Economique, 29, S448-S454.
    • King, Robert and Levine, Ross. (1994). Capital Fundamentalism, Economic Development and Economic Growth, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 40 (June), 259-292.
    • Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth, 14, 640.
    • Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth, 14, 640.
    • Kortum, S. (1997). Research, patenting, and technological change. Econometrics 65 (6), 1389- 1419.
    • Kramer, R. M. and Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Sage Publications, Inc.
    • Kravchenko, N. A. (2011). The Problem of Measuring and Assessing National Innovation Systems. Problems of Economic Transition, 53(9), 61-73.
    • Krishna, Anirudh. (2000). Creating and Harnessing Social Capital. In Dasgupta, Partha and Serageldin, Ismail (eds.), Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective (pp. 71-93). Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
    • Krugman, P. (1995). Increasing returns, imperfect competition and the positive theory of international trade. Handbook of international economics, 3, 1243-1277.
    • Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago.
    • Kuran, T. (2012). The long divergence: How Islamic law held back the Middle East. Princeton University Press.
    • Kurtzman, Joel. (1997). The Knowledge Economy, an interview with Paul Romer. strategy + business, 1st quarter. Booz Allen Hamilton.
    • Kuznets, Simon. (1965). Economic Grorth and Structure. NY: W. W. Norton
    • Lains, P. 2003. Catching Up to the European Core: Portuguese Economic Growth, 1910--1990. Explorations in Economic History 40:369--86.
    • Lall, S. and Albaladejo, M. (2004). Indicators of relative importance in IPRs in developing coutries. Backgroun paper for ICTSD/UNCTAD Capacity Building Project on Trips and Development.
    • Lam, A. (2002). Alternative societal models of learning and innovation in the knowledge economy. International Social Science Journal, 54(171), 67-82.
    • Lazonick, W. (2005). The innovative firm (pp. 29-55). Oxford University Press: New York.Lederman, Daniel, and Maloney, William F. (2006). Innovation in Mexico: NAFTA Is Not Enough. In Global Integration and Technology Transfer, ed. Bernard Hoekman and Beata Smarzynska Javorcik, 305-339. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
    • Lazonick and West. (1998). Organizational Innovation and Competitive Advantage. In G. Dosi, et al. (eds.) Technology, organization, and competitiveness: perspectives on industrial and corporate change, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Leifer, R., McDermott, C., Colarelli O'Connor, G., Peters, L., Rice, M., and Veryzer, R. (2000), Radical innovation: How mature companies can outsmart upstarts. Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.
    • Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building & Sustainint the Sources of Innovation. Harvard Business Press.
    • Liu, Lili, and Tybout, James. (1996). Productivity Growth in Colombia and Chile: Panel-Based Evidence on the Role of Entry, Exit and Learning. In Industrial Evolution in Developing Countries, ed. Mark J. Roberts and James R. Tybout. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Lu, X. (2011). Sources of external technology, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability in Chinese state-owned high-tech enterprises. World Development, 39(7), 1240-1248. Lim, Philip Wonhyuk. Path Dependence in Action: the Adoption and Persistence of the Korean Model of Economic Development.
    • Lu, X., & White, S. (2001). Comparing innovation systems: a framework and application to China's transitional context. Research policy, 30(7), 1091-1114.
    • Lucas, Robert E. (1976). Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique. in The Phillips Curve and Labour Markets. K. Brunner and A.H. Meltzer, eds. Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Amsterdam, pp. 19-46.
    • Lucas, Robert E. (1988). On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, pp. 3-42.
    • Lundvall, B. A. (1992). User-producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalisation. National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning, 45-67.
    • Lundvall, Bengt Ake. and Johnson, B. (1994). The learning economy, Journal of Industry Studies, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 23-42.
    • Lundvall, B. Å., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research policy, 31(2), 213-231.
    • MacLeod, C. (2000). Inventing the industrial revolution: The English patent system, 1660-1800. Cambridge University Press.
    • Machlup, Fritz. (1973). Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the US. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    • Maddison, A. (1987). Growth and Slowdown in Advanced Capitalist Economies: Techniques of Quantitative Assessment. Journal of Economic Literature 25:649--98.
    • Mannix, E. and Neale, E. (2006). What Differences Make a differernce? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6, 31-55.
    • Marx, K. (1867 [1976]). Capital. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    • Marx, K. (1859 [1979]). A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. New York: International Publishers.
    • Matthews, R. C. O., C. H. Feinstein, and J. C. Odling-Smee. (1982). British Economic Growth, 1856--1973. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
    • McClelland, D. C. (1987). Characteristics of Successful Entrepreneurs*. The journal of creative behaviour, 21(3), 219-233.
    • Ménard, C. (1995). Markets as institutions versus organizations as markets? Disentangling some fundamental concepts. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization, 28(2), 161-182.
    • Merges, R. P., & Nelson, R. R. (1990). On the complex economics of patent scope. Columbia Law Review, 90(4), 839-916.
    • Metcalfe, S. (1995). The economic foundations of technology policy: equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change, 446.
    • Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
    • Mowery, D. C., & Oxley, J. E. (1995). Inward technology transfer and competitiveness: the role of national innovation systems. Cambridge journal of economics, 19(1), 67-93.
    • Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2005). Universities in national innovation systems. The Oxford handbook of innovation, 209-39.
    • Mueller, S. L., & Thomas, A. S. (2001). Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(1), 51-75.
    • Murmann, J. P., & Landau, R. (1998). On the making of competitive advantage: the development of the chemical industries in Britain and Germany since 1850. Chemicals and long-term economic growth: insights from the chemical industry, 27-70.
    • Narula, R., & Zanfei, A. (2005). Globalisation of innovation. Handbook of Innovation, 318-45.
    • Negroponte. N. (2003, February). MIT Technology Review.
    • Nelson, R. R. (1987). Institutions supporting technical change in the United States.
    • Nelson, Richard R. and Phelps, Edmund (1966), 'Investment in humans, technological diffusion, and economic growth', American Economic Review, vol. 56, No. 2, (May),pp. 69-75.
    • Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1-1
    • Nelson, Richard R. and Winter, Disney G. (1982, March). The Schumpeterian Tradeoff Revisited. American Economic Review, 72/1, pp. 114-132.
    • Nelson, Richard R. and Winter, Sidney G. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    • Nonaka, Ikujiro, and Takeuchi, Hirotaka. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. NY: Oxford University Press.
    • Nordhaus, W. D., & Nordhaus, W. D. (1969). Invention, growth, and welfare: A theoretical treatment of technological change (pp. 70-90). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic development quarterly, 14(1), 15-34.
    • Porter, M., & Stern, S. (2001). Location matters. Sloan Management Review, 42(4), 28-36.
    • Potrafke, N. (2013). Minority positions in the German Council of Economic Experts: A political economic analysis. European Journal of Political Economy.
    • Powell and Grodal. (2005). Networks of innovators. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation.
    • Prados de la Escosura, L., and J. Roses. (2007). The Sources of Long-Run Growth in Spain, 1850-- 2000. Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper No. 6189, London.
    • Prais, S. J., & Daly, A. (1981). Productivity and Industrial Structure: A Statistical Study of Manufacturing Industry in Britain, Germany, and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Pugh, D. S., Hickson, D. J., Hinings, C. R., & Turner, C. (1969). The context of organization structures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 91-114.
    • Putnam, Robert. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    • Putnam, Robert. (1993). ―The Prosperous Community-Social Capital and Public Life,‖ The American Prospect 13: 35-42.
    • Putnam, Robert, ed. (2002). Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.
    • Rosenberg, N. (1963). Technological change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840-1910. Journal of Economic History 23, 414-443.
    • Rosenberg, N. (1976). Technological change in the machine tool industry, 1840-1910. In: Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
    • Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: technology and economics. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Cambridge University Press.
    • Rossi, N., and G. Toniolo. (1992). Catching Up or Falling Behind? Italy''s Economic Growth, 1895--1947. Economic History Review 45:537--63.
    • Rousseau, D. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Sage Publications, Incorporated.
    • Schulze, M.S. (2007). Origins of Catch-Up Failure: Comparative Productivity Growth in the Habsburg Empire, 1879--1910. European Review of Economic History 11:189--218.
    • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1950). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (3rd edition). London: Allen and Unwin.1950.
    • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1964). Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, abd Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    • Smith, K. H. (2005). Measuring innovation. The Oxford handbook of innovation/ed. by Jan Fagerberg, David C. Mowery and Richard R. Nelson.
    • Smith, S. C., & Todaro, M. P. (2009). Economic development 10. Aufl., Harlow [ua]: Addison Wesley.
    • Solow, Robert M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, pp. 65-74.
    • Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate production function. The review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), 312-320.
    • Solow, R. M. (2005). Rethinking fiscal policy. Oxford review of economic policy, 21(4), 509- 514.Stehr, N. (2002). Knowledge and economic conduct: The social foundations of the modern economy (Vol. 14). University of Toronto Press.
    • Thurieaux, B., Arnold, E., and Couchot, C. (eds.). (2001). Innovation and Enterprise Creation: Statistics and Indicators, Luxembourg: European Committions (EUR 17038).
    • Top 10. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.urbanpeek.com/2012.
    • Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., & Jaffe, A. (1997). University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and new technology, 5(1), 19-50.
    • Tsang, M. C., Rumberger, R. W., & Levin, H. M. (1991). The impact of surplus schooling on worker productivity. Industrial relations: a journal of economy and society, 30(2), 209- 228.
    • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2009). Arab Knowledge Report 2009. Dubai: Mohammed bin Rashid al Makhtoum Foundation.
    • Varsakelis, N. C. (2006). Education, political institutions and innovative activity: A cross-country empirical investigation. Research Policy, 35(7), 1083-1090.
    • Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Research in organizational behaviour, 20, 77-140.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article