Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Yusoff, A.; Turner, M.S.; Taylor, C.M.; Sims, N.D. (2010)
Publisher: Springer Verlag
Languages: English
Types: Article
The complex interaction between machining structural systems and the cutting process results in machining instability, so called chatter. In some milling scenarios, process damping is a useful phenomenon that can be exploited to mitigate chatter and hence improve productivity. In the present study, experiments are performed to evaluate the performance of process damped milling considering different tool geometries (edge radius, rake and relief angles and variable helix/pitch). The results clearly indicate that variable helix/pitch angles most significantly increase process damping performance. Additionally, increased cutting edge radius moderately improves process damping performance, while rake and relief angles have a smaller and closely coupled effect.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 4. E. Soliman and F. Ismail. Chatter suppression by adaptive speed modulation. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 37(3):355, 1997.
    • 5. Y. S. Liao and Y. C. Young. A new on-line spindle speed regulation strategy for chatter control. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 36(5):651, 1996.
    • 6. Nejat Olgac and R. Sipahi. Dynamic and stability of variable pitch milling. Journal of Vibration and Control, 13(7):1031-1043, 2007.
    • 7. N. D. Sims, B. Mann, and S. Huyanan. Analytical prediction of chatter stability for variable pitch and variable helix milling tools. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 317(3-5):664-686, 2008.
    • 8. S. A. Tobias and W. Fishwick. Theory of regenerative machine tool chatter. The Engineer, 205:199-203, 1958.
    • 9. Y. Altintas and M. Weck. Chatter stability of metal cutting and grinding. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 53(2):619- 642, 2004.
    • 10. Y. Altintas, M. Eynian, and H. Onozuka. Identification of dynamic cutting force coefficients and chatter stability with process damping. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 57(1):371-374, 2008.
    • 11. E. Budak and L. T. Tunc. A new method for identification and modeling of process damping in machining. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 131(5):051019, 2009.
    • 12. D. Montgomery and Y. Altintas. Mechanism of cutting force and surface generation in dynamic milling. Transaction ASME Journal of Engineering Industry, 113:160-168, 1991.
    • 13. T. Delio, S. Smith, J. Tlusty, and C. Zamudio. Stiffness, stability, and loss of process damping in high speed machining : , fundamental issues in machining, vol ped 43, dallas, tx, 1990. pp. 171- 191. asme, new york, ny. Precision Engineering, 13(3):236, 1991.
    • 14. M. A. Elbestawi, F. Ismail, R. Du, and B. C. Ullagaddi. Modelling machining dynamics including damping in the tool-workpiece interface. Transaction ASME Journal of Engineering Industry, 116 (4):435-439, 1994.
    • 15. S. Ranganath, K. Narayanan, and J. W. Sutherland. The role of flank face interference in improving the accuracy of dynamic force predictions in peripheral milling. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 121:593-599, 1999.
    • 16. C. Y. Huang and J. J. Junz Wang. Mechanistic modeling of process damping in peripheral milling. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 129(1):12-20, 2007.
    • 17. S. Turner. Process damping parameters. In Trends in Aerospace Manufacturing 2009 International Conference (TRAM '09). Sheffield, 2009.
    • 18. J. Tlusty. Manufacturing Process and Equipment. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2000.
    • 19. T. R. Sisson and R. L. Kegg. An explanation of low speed chatter effects. Transaction ASME Journal of Engineering Industry, 91 (4):951-956, 1969.
    • 20. S. Huyanan and N. D. Sims. Active vibration absorbers for chatter mitigation during milling. In Proc Ninth International Conference on Vibrations in Rotating Machinery 2008, pages 125-140. University of Exeter, 2008.
    • 21. Satienpong Huyanan and Neil D. Sims. Vibration control strategies for proof-mass actuators. Journal of Vibration and Control, 13(12):1785-1806, 2007.
    • 22. L. N. Virgin. Introduction to experimental nonlinear dynamics: A case study in mechanical vibration. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2000.
    • 23. N. D. Sims. The self-excitation damping ratio: A chatter criterion for time-domain milling simulations. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 127(3):433- 445, 2005.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article