LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Mahaffey, Ryan; Morrison, Stewart C; Drechsler, Wendy I; Cramp, Mary Christine (2012)
Publisher: BioMed Central
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Background\ud A variety of multi-segmental foot models have been produced\ud to examine patterns of foot segmental movement\ud during gait cycle to identify biomechanical differences\ud between normal and pathological foot function[1-3].\ud The reliability of foot models to accurately describe\ud motion of the foot joints is dependent on the ability of\ud the examiner to repeatedly apply markers to specific\ud landmarks and the relevance of models’ segmental\ud descriptions to underlying anatomy. The aim of this\ud study was to test the reliability of segmental angles measured\ud by three published foot models during paediatric\ud gait.\ud Materials and methods\ud Sixteen children, aged 6 to 12 years old, were recruited\ud to the study. Marker sets for three foot models 3DFoot\ud [1], Oxford Foot Model (OFM)[2], and Kinfoot[3] were\ud applied to their right feet simultaneously which to the\ud authors knowledge, is the first direct comparison of the\ud three models during gait. Each foot model was assessed\ud for repeatability of maximal joint angle and range of\ud motion during the gait cycle between two testing occasions.\ud Absolute angular differences and standard error\ud of measurement (SEM) are reported.\ud Results\ud Repeatability of all maximal segmental angles and range\ud of motions were higher in 3DFoot compared to OFM\ud and Kinfoot (Table 1).
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Carson M, Harrington M, Thompson N, O'Connor J, Theologis T: Kinematic analysis of a multi-segment foot model for research and clinical applications: a repeatability analysis. J Biomech 2001, 34:1299-2307.
    • MacWilliams B, Cowley M, Nicholson D: Foot kinematics and kinetics during adolescent gait. Gait Posture 2003, 17:214-224.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article