Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Denis, A. (2003)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HB
Bunge (2000) distinguishes two main methodological approaches of holism and individualism, and associates with them policy prescriptions of centralism and laissezfaire. He identifies systemism as a superior approach to both the study and management of society. The present paper, seeking to correct and develop this line of thought, suggests a more complex relation between policy and methodology. There are two possible methodological underpinnings for laissez-faire: while writers such as Friedman and Lucas fit Bunge’s pattern, more sophisticated advocates of laissez-faire, such as Smith and Hayek, base their policy prescription in a methodology quite divergent from the individualism Bunge describes.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bunge, M., 2000. Systemism: the alternative to individualism and holism. The Journal of Socio-Economics 29, 147--157.
    • Dawkins, R., 1989. The Selfish Gene. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    • Denis, A., 1999. Was Adam Smith an Individualist? History of the Human Sciences 12, 3, August, 71--86.
    • De Vany, A., 1996. Information, chance, and evolution: Alchian and the economics of self-organisation. Economic Inquiry 34, 3, June, 427--443.
    • Friedman, M., 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
    • Haworth, A., 1994. Anti-libertarianism. Markets, philosophy and myth. London, Routledge.
    • Hayek, F. A., 1967. Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    • Hayek, F. A., 1979. The Counter-Revolution of Science. Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Indianapolis, LibertyPress.
    • Keynes, J. M., The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Austin Robinson, Elizabeth Johnson and Donald Moggridge (Eds). London, Macmillan: Volume VII, 1973. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Volume XX, 1981. Donald Moggridge (Ed.) Activities 1929-31. Rethinking Employment and Unemployment Policies.
    • Lucas, R. E., Jr, 1987. Models of Business Cycles. Oxford, Blackwell.
    • Pack, S. J., 1995. Theological (and hence Economic) Implications of Adam Smith's “Principles Which Lead and Direct Philosophical Enquiries”. History of Political Economy 27, 2, 289--307 Smith, A. The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith.
    • Oxford, Clarendon Press/OUP: Volume I, 1976a. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Raphael, D. D. and Macfie, A. L. (Eds.) Volume II, 1976b. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Campbell, R. H., Skinner, A. S. and Todd, W. B. (Eds.).
    • Whitman, D. G., 1998. Hayek contra Pangloss on Evolutionary Systems.
    • Constitutional Political Economy 9, 45--66.
    • Revised: Thursday, 28 August 2014
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article