LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Snowden, Robert Jefferson; Milne, Alan B. (1996)
Publisher: MIT Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Recent neurophysiological evidence (e.g., Graziano, Andersen, & Snowden, 1994) suggested that some cells in the medial superior temporal area (MST) of the Old World monkey are sensitive to complex motions such as those brought about by a surface moving in depth or rotating. Two important findings were that these cells show position invariance (i.e., their preferred stimulus does not change across the receptive field), and that some cells were selective for “spiralling” stimuli rather than pure rotations or pure expansion/contractions. This paper attempts to provide evidence for similar processes in the human visual system by employing the technique of selective adaptation. We have simulated surfaces undergoing a motion in depth (div) or a rotation (curl), but have removed any cues that are not related to global motion. After adapting to a large pattern undergoing, say, an expansion, an aftereffect that contained an element of contraction could be elicited by placing small test patterns anywhere in the adapted area. This suggests that the global structure of the motion field must have been encoded as well as the local motion. Likewise thresholds for detecting motions similar to the adapting motion were elevated across the adapted area, while thresholds for other motions were not. Hence the effects of adaptation are both selective and show a degree of position invariance. Adaptation to pure div or pure curl stimuli was compared with adaptation to spiralling stimuli. Threshold elevation was always selective for the adapting motion and the shape and broadness of tuning did not vary. In simulations we could not reproduce our results using a model that had only div and curl detectors, but we could reproduce them if we allowed for detectors tuned for a broad range of spiral pitches. Our results suggest that humans encode the complex motion of surfaces by detectors tuned to many different types of motion and that the detectors are invariant across space in their properties.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Addams, R. (1834). Ah account of a peculiar optical phaenomenon seen after having looked at a moving body etc. London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 3rd series, 5, 373-374.
    • Albright, T D. (1984). Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual arca MT of the macaque.Journal of Neuroptyysiology, 52, 1106-1130.
    • Albright, T D. (1989). Centrifugal directional bias in the middle temporal visual area (MT) of the macaque. Visual Neuroscience, 2, 177-188.
    • Ball, K., & Sekuler, R. (1980). Human vision favors centrifugal motion. Perception, 9, 317-325.
    • Blake, R., & Hiris, E. (1993). Another means for measuring the motion aftereffect. Vision Research, 33, 1589-1592.
    • Bonnet, C. (1982). Thresholds of motion perception. In A. H. Wertheim, W. A. Wagenaar, & H. W. Leibowitz (Eds.), Tutor# als on motion perception. New York: Plenum Press.
    • Bonnet, C., & Pouthas, V. (1972). Interactions between spatial and kinetic dimensions in the movement aftereffect. Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 193-200.
    • B¡ K. H., Shadlen, M. N., Newsome, W. T., & Movshon, J. A. (1993). Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals. Visual Neuroscience, 10, 1157- 1169.
    • Broerse, J., Shaw, C., Dodwell, P., & Muir, D. (1994). Colored aftereffects contingent on global transformations? Spatial Vision, 8, 95-117.
    • Cavanagh, P, & Favreau, O. E. (1980). Motion aftercffect: A global mechanism for the perception of rotation. Perception, 9, 175-182.
    • Culbam, J. C., & Cavanagh, P (1995). Motion aftereffects of attentive tracking ate rotation-specific but independent of position. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science Supplement, 36, 857.
    • Cnmming, B. (1994). Motion-in-depth. In A. T Smith & R.J. Snowden (Eds.), The visual detection of motion. San Diego: Academic Press.
    • De Bruyn, B., & Orban, G. A. (1990). The role of direction information in the perception of geometric flow components. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 433-438.
    • De Bruyn, B., & Orban, G. A. (1993). Segregation of spatially superimposed optic flow components.Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance 19, 1014-1027.
    • Duffy, C. J., & Wurtz, R. H. (1991a). Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large-field stimuli.Journal of Neurophysiology, 65, 1329-1345.
    • Duffy, C.J., & Wurtz, R. H. (1991b). Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. II. Mechanisms of response selectivity revealed by small-field stimuli.Journal of Neurophysiology, 65, 1346-1359.
    • Edwards, M., & Badcock, D. (1993). Asymmetries in the sensitivity to motion in dePth: A centripetal bias. Perception, 22, 1013-1023.
    • Emerson, V. E, Humphrey, G. K., & DodweU, P C. (1985). Colored aftereffects contingent on pattems generated by Lie transform groups. PerceptŸ and Psychophysics, 37, 155- 162.
    • Freeman, T C. A., & Harris, M. G. (1992). Human sensitivity to cxpanding and rotating motion" Effects of complcmentary masking and directional structure. Vision Research, 32, 81-87.
    • Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    • Goldstein, A. G. (1958). On the after-effects of the watcrfall and spiral iUusions. American Journal of Psychology, 71, 608-609.
    • Graziano, M. S. A., Andersen, R. A., & Snowden, R.J. (1994). Tuning of MST neurons to spiral stimuli.Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 54-67.
    • Hershenson, M. (1993). Linear and rotation motion aftereffects a s a ¡ of inspection duration. Vision Research, 33, 1913-1919.
    • Holland, H. C. (1965). The spiral aftereffect. Oxford: Pergamon.
    • Koenderink, J. J. (1986). Optic flow. Vision Research, 26, 161- 180.
    • Kocnderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A.J. (1975). Invariant properties of the motion paraUax field due to the movement of rigid bodies relative to an observer. Optica Acta, 22, 773- 791.
    • Lee, D. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time to collision. Perception, 5, 437- 459.
    • Legge, G. E., & Campbell, E W. (1981). Displacement detection in human vision. Vision Research, 21, 205-214.
    • Longuet-Higgins, H. C., & Prazdny, K. (1980). The interpretation of moving retinal images. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, B 208, 385-387.
    • Mather, G. (1980). The movement aftereffect a n d a distribution-shift model for coding the direction of visual movemero. Perception, 9, 379-382.
    • Maunsell, J. H. R., & van Essen, D. C. (1983). Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual arca of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation.Journal of Neurophysiology, 49, 1127- 1147.
    • Maunsell, J. H. R., & van Essen, D. C. (1987). Topographic organization of the middle temporal visual arca in the macaque monkey: Representational biases and the relationship to callosal connections and botmdaries.Journal of Comparative Neurology, 266, 535-555.
    • McCollough, C. (1994). Do McCollough effects provide evidence of global pattern-processes? Investigative Ophtbalmology and Visual Science Supplement, 35, 1489.
    • Milne, A. B., & Snowden, R.J. (1993). Is there anything special about expansion and rotational flow fields? Perception, 22, 95A.
    • Mollon, J. D. (1974). After-effects and the brain. New Scientist, 61, 479-482.
    • Morrone, M. C., Burr, D. C., & Vaina, L. M. (1995). Two stages of visual processing for radial and circular motion. Nature (London), 376, 507-509.
    • Nakayama, K., & Tyler, C. W. (1981). Psychophysical isolation of movement sensitivity by removal of familiar position cues. Vision Researcb, 21, 427-433.
    • Newsome, W. T., & Par› E. B. (1988). A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT).Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 2201- 2211.
    • Orban, G. A., Lagae, L., Raiguel, S., Xiao, D., & Maes, H. (1995). The speed tuning of medial superior temporal (MST) cell responses to optic-flow components. Perception, 24, 269- 285.
    • Plateau, J. (1850). Vierte Notiz uber eine neue sonderbare Anwendung des Verweilens der Eindmcke auf der Nctzhaut. Poggendorffs Annalen, 80, 287-292.
    • Raymond, J. (1993). Movemcnt direction analysers: Indcpendence and bandwidth. Vision Researcb, 33, 767-775.
    • Raymond, J. E. (1994). Directional anisotropy of motion sensitivity across the visual field. Vision Research, 34, 1029- 1038.
    • Regan, D., & Bcverley, K. I. (1978a). Looming detectors in the human visual pathway. Vision Researcb, 18, 415-421.
    • Regan, D., & Bcverley, K. (1978b). Illusory motion in depth: After-effect of adaptation to changing size. Vision Research, 18, 209-212.
    • Regan, D., & Beverley, K. I. (1985). Visual responses to vorticity and the neural analysis of optic flow.Journal of the optical Society of America A, 2, 280-283.
    • Saito, H.-A., Yukie, M., Tanaka, K., Hikosaka, K., Fukada, Y., & Iwai, E. (1986). Integration of dircction signals of image motion in the superior temporal sulcus of the macaque monkey.Journal of Neuroscience, 6, 145-157.
    • Siegel, R. M., & Andersen, R. A. (1986). Motion perceptual deficits following ibotenic acid lesions of the middle temporal arca in the behaving rhesus monkey. Socie{y for Neuroscience Abstracts, 12, 1183.
    • Simpson, J. I. (1984). The accessory optic system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 7, 13-41.
    • Simpson, W. A. (1992). Optic flow and dcpth perception. Spatial Vision, 7, 35-75.
    • Snowden, R.J. (1992). Sensitivity to relative and absolute motion. Perception, 21, 563-568.
    • Snowdcn, R.J. (1994). Motion processing in the primate cerebral cortex. In A. T. Smith & R.J. Snowden (Eds.), Visual detection of motion. San Diego: Academic Press.
    • Snowden, R. J., & Bt~ddick, O. J. (1989). The combination of motion signals over time. Vision Research, 29, 1621-1630.
    • Snowden, R.J., & MiMe, A. B. (1994). Evidence for the existence of mechanisms tuned for complex motions in the human visual system. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science Supplement, 35, 1726.
    • Snowden, R.J., Treue, S., & Andersen, R. A. (1992). The response of neurons in area V1 and MT of the alert rhesus monkey to moving random dot patterns. Experimental Brain Research, 88, 389-400.
    • Tanaka, K., Fukada, Y., & Salto, H. (1989). Underlying mechanisms of the response specificity of the expansion/contraction and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey.Journal of Neurophysiology, 62, 642-656.
    • Tanaka, K., Hikosaka, K., Saito, H.-A., Yukie, M., Fukada, Y., & Iwai, E. (1986). Analysis of local and wide-field movements in the superior temporal visual areas of the macaque monkey.Journal of Neuroscience, 6, 134-144.
    • Tanaka, K., & Salto, H. (1989). Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey.Journal of Neurophysiolog)9162, 626-641.
    • Tyler, C. W., & Torres,J. (1972). Frequency response characteristics for sinusoidal movement in the fovea and periphery. Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 232-236.
    • Weisstein, N., Maguire, W., & Berbaum, K. (1977). A phantommotion aftereffect. Science, 198, 955-958.
    • Wohlgemuth, A. (1911). On the aftereffect of seen motion. British Journal of Psychology, 1, 1-117.
    • Zeki, S. M. (1980). The response properties of cells in the middle temporal atea (area MT) of owl monkey visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 207, 239-248.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article