Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Amin, M.; Edgar, D. F; Parkins, D.; Hull, C. (2014)
Publisher: The College of Optometrists
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: RE
Purpose: Cataract enhanced service (direct referral) schemes have been in existence for over 12 years. Such schemes make better use of the primary care practitioner's professional expertise and have the potential to reduce costs and provide an improved patient pathway. Surprisingly little has been published about these schemes, hence there is a lack of evidence to inform local decision making about existing and future services. The aim of this study was to provide more evidence by surveying the Local Optical Committees (LOCs) to obtain their views on their involvement or lack of involvement in cataract enhanced service schemes in the London region. Secondary aims were to compare how schemes operate and determine why schemes do not exist in some areas.\ud \ud Method: A structured survey of London’s 14 LOCs was carried out on two occasions (2007 and 2012). LOCs were contacted via e-mail, telephone or written letter. Some supporting information was obtained from PCTs. All data were analysed qualitatively.\ud \ud Results: In 2007, only two out of the 10 LOCs that had participated in the 2005 Cataract Choose and Book scheme were involved in running a full direct referral scheme. This had risen to six by 2012 with a total of 11 LOCs having participated in a trial/pilot scheme by that date. The remaining three LOCs have never participated in a scheme. Although there are similarities across schemes (e.g. requirement for accreditation, a referral fee etc), marked differences were found in patient booking arrangements, requirements during initial assessment and post-operative assessment. The percentage of LOCs involved in full schemes in the London region (43%) is lower than for the rest of England (69%). Where trial/pilot schemes had run but no full scheme had been implemented the major reasons reported were: lack of central funding; the schemes were only feasibility studies; and the requirement for a Unique Booking Reference Number (UBRN) for the Choose and Book process.\ud \ud Conclusions: Enhanced cataract service schemes do not always develop into full schemes even if the trial/pilot scheme has been deemed successful. Schemes may have a more prominent role in future with requirements on Clinical Commissioning Groups to provide an improved patient experience within tighter financial constraints. The co-ordinating activity across England of the Local Optical Committee Support Unit (LOCSU) and the newly formed Local Professional Networks for Eyecare should help increase uniformity of approach. All established cataract schemes will need to be re-procured during 2013/14 if they are to continue without interruption.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Office for National Statistics. Population estimates available at http://www.statistics.gov.uk/hub/population/population-change/populationestimates/index.html (accessed 16th October 2013)
    • 2. Evans JR, Fletcher AE, Wormald RP. Causes of visual impairment in people aged 75 years and older in Britain: an add-on study to the MRC Trial of Assessment and Management of Older People in the Community. Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88:365-70.
    • 3. Department of Health. Action on Cataracts. Good practice guidance. UK:NHS Executive, 2000. Available at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh. gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/di gitalasset/dh_4014514.pdf (accessed 15th October 2013)
    • 4. Hospital Episode Statistics. Headline Figures from 2000-1 to 2010-11. http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/Ease/servlet/ContentServer?siteID=1937&cat egoryID=193 (accessed 16th October 2013)
    • 5. Sparrow JM. Cataract surgical rates: is there overprovision in certain areas? Br J Ophthalmol 2007; 91: 852-853
    • 6. Black N, Browne J, van der Meulen J et al. Is there overutilization of cataract surgery in England? Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 13-17
    • 7. Department of Health. National Eye Care Services Steering Group - First Report 2004. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http://www.dh.
    • 14. Wong R, Horgan SE, Gammon S, Haig-Brown G. Direct referrals for cataract surgery. Optician 2003; 226: 20-22.
    • 15. Newsom W, Gibbons H, Flanagan D, Hingorani M. Direct referral of cataracts in Huntingdon. Sharing good practice. Optom Today 2005; 22: 21-24.
    • 16. Lash SC, Prendiville CP, Samson A, Lewis K, Munneke R, Parkin BT. Optometrist referrals for cataract and 'Action on Cataracts' guidelines: are optometrists following them and are they effective? Ophthal Physiol Opt 2006; 26: 464-467.
    • 17. Park JC, Ross AH, Tole DM et al. Evaluation of a new cataract surgery referral pathway. Eye (Lond). 2009; 23: 309-13
    • 18. Holmes K, Park J, Tole D. Improving the operative rate for cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013;39(5):712-715.
    • 19. Venerus K. Enhancing Local Services. The Optician, 8th October 2010
    • 20. Eye Care Services Steering Group. Report of the Cataract Sub-Group. Vision 2020 UK, 2004. Available at http://www.vision2020uk.org.uk/library.asp?libraryID=264§ion= accessed 16th October 2013)
    • 21. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Cataract Surgery Guidelines, September 2010. Available at www.rcophth.ac.uk/core/core_picker/download.asp?id=544 (accessed 17th October 2013)
    • 22. Muthucumarana DJ, Rimmer TJ. Cataract surgery and the optometrist. Eye (Lond). 2000; 14: 777-778.
    • 80-90 96.3 93.3 77 (88 after 1 follow up appointment) 100
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article