LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Guggenmos, Matthias; Thoma, Volker; Cichy, Radoslaw Martin; Haynes, John-Dylan; Sterzer, Philipp; Richardson-Klavehn, Alan
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: genetic structures, education
A fundamental issue in visual cognition is whether high-level visual areas code objects in a part-based or a view-based (holistic) format. By examining the viewpoint invariance of object recognition, previous behavioral and neuroimaging studies have yielded ambiguous results, supporting both types of representational formats. A critical factor distinguishing the two formats could be the availability of attentional resources, as a number of studies have found greater viewpoint invariance for attended compared to unattended objects. It has therefore been suggested that attention is necessary to enable\ud part-based representations, whereas holistic representations are automatically activated irrespective of attention. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging study we used a multivariate approach to probe the format of object representations in human lateral occipital complex (LOC) and its dependence on attention. We presented human participants with intact and half-split versions of objects that were either attended or unattended. Cross-classifying between intact and split objects, we found that the objectrelated information coded in activation patterns of intact objects is fully preserved in the patterns of split objects and vice versa. Importantly, the generalization between intact and split objects did not depend on attention. Our findings demonstrate that LOC codes objects in a non-holistic format, both in the presence and absence of attention.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Andresen, D.R., Vinberg, J., Grill-Spector, K., 2009. The representation of object viewpoint
    • in human visual cortex. Neuroimage 45, 522-536.
    • Biederman, I., Cooper, E.E., 1991. Evidence for complete translational and Treflectional
    • invariance in visual object priming. Perception 20, 585-593.
    • Bisley, J.W., 2011. The neural basis of visual attention. J. PhSysiol. 589, 49-57.
    • Brainard, D.H., 1997. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spat. UVis. 10, 433-436. N
    • Bülthoff, H.H., Edelman, S., 1992. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view
    • interpolation theory of object recognition. Proc. NAatl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 60-64.
    • Cichy, R.M., Sterzer, P., Heinzle, J., Elliott, LM.T.,Ramirez, F., Haynes, J.-D., 2013. Probing
    • Hum. Brain Mapp. 34, 1636-1651.
    • Edelman, S., Bülthoff, H.H., 1992. OrEientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and
    • novel views of three-dimensional oTbjects. Vision Res. 32, 2385-2400.
    • Edelman, S., Intrator, N., 2000. P(Coarse coding of shape fragments) Representation of
    • structure. Spat. Vis. 13, 255-264. E
    • Eger, E., Ashburner, J., HCaynes, J.-D., Dolan, R.J., Rees, G., 2008. fMRI activity patterns in
    • 20, 356-370. C
    • Eger, E., Henson, RA.N.A., Driver, J., Dolan, R.J., 2004. BOLD repetition decreases in object-
    • responsive ventral visual areas depend on spatial attention. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 1241-1247.
    • 2005. A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional
    • imaging data. Neuroimage 25, 1325-1335.
    • Epshtein, B., Ullman, S., 2007. Semantic Hierarchies for Recognizing Objects and Parts, in:
    • IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007. CVPR '07. pp. 1-8.
    • Hummel, J.E., Biederman, I., 1992. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape
    • recognition. Psychol. Rev. 99, 480-517.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article