Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Jansson, Lina; Tallant, Jonathan (2016)
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Our aim in this article is to offer a new justification for preferring theories that are more quantitatively parsimonious than their rivals. We discuss cases where it seems clear that those involved opted for more quantitatively parsimonious theories. We extend previous work on quantitative parsimony by offering an independent probabilistic justification for preferring the more quantitatively parsimonious theories in particular episodes of theory choice. Our strategy allows us to avoid worries that other considerations, such as pragmatic factors of computational tractability and so on, could be the driving ones in the historical cases under consideration.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Avogadro, A. [1811]. 'Essai d'une manière de déterminer les masses relatives des molécules élémentaires des corps, et les proportions selon lesquelles elles entrent dans ces combinaisons', Journal de Physique, de Chemie et d'Histoire Naturelle, LXXIII, 58-76
    • Avogadro, A. [1922]. 'Essay on a manner of determining the relative masses of the elementary molecules of bodies, and the proportions in which they enter into these compounds', Alembic Club Reprints, No. 4 : Foundations of the Molecular Theory comprising papers and extracts by John Dalton, Joseph-Louis Gay-Lussac and Amedeo Avogadro (1808-1811), Oliver and Boyd: Edinburgh
    • Baker, A. [2003].   'Quantitative Parsimony and Explanatory Power', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54, 245-259
    • Baker, A. [2013], 'Simplicity', The Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)
    • Gould, B. [1850], Report on the History of the Discovery of Neptune, Washington: Smithsonian Institute
    • Grant, R. [1852], History of Physical Astronomy, from the earliest ages to the middle of the nineteenth century, London: Henry G Bohn
    • Hanson, N R. [1962], 'Leverrier: The Zenith and Nadir of Newtonian Mechanics', Isis,
    • Huemer, M. [2009]. 'When is Parsimony a Virtue?', Philosophical Quarterly, 59, 216-236
    • Le Verrier, U. [1859], Lettre de M. Le Verrier à  M. Faye sur la théorie de Mercure et sur
    • l'Académie des Sciences, 49, 379-383
    • Nolan, D. [1997]. 'Quantitative Parsimony', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 48, 329-443
    • Partington, J. R. [1964]. A History of Chemistry, volume 4, Macmillan, London; St. Martin's Press, New York
    • Sober, E. [1981], 'The Principle of Parsimony', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 32, 145-156
    • Sober, E. [1994]. 'Let's razor Ockham's razor', chapter 7 in Sober, E. From a Biological Point of View, Cambridge University Press
    • Tallant, J. [2013].   'Quantitative Parsimony and the Metaphysics of Time: Motivating Presentism', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 87, 688-705
    • Wallace, D. [2012]. The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory According to the Everett
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article