Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Tang, C.S.; Sodhi, M.; Formentini, M. (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HF
Global agri-food companies such as Barilla and SABMiller are purchasing agricultural products directly from farmers using different types of contracts to ensure stable supply. We examine one such contract with partially-guaranteed prices (PGP). Under a PGP contract, around sowing time, the buying firm agrees to purchase the crop when harvested by the farmer, offering a guaranteed unit price for any fraction of the produce and offering the commodity market price prevailing at the time of delivery for the remainder. The farmer then chooses the fraction. By analyzing a Stackelberg game, we show (1) how the PGP contract creates mutual benefits when the firm’s purchase quantity is taken as being exogenous. We also analyze how the PGP contract is robust in creating value for both the firm and the farmer (2) when the firm’s purchase quantity is endogenously determined; (3) when the firm provides advisory services to the farmer; and (4) when the firm offers a price premium as an incentive for farmers to exert efforts to comply with ‘sustainable’ agricultural practices.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1] Ahumada, O., & Villalobos, J. R. (2009). Application of planning models in the agrifood supply chain: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(1), 1-20.
    • [2] Aiello, G., Enea, M., and Muriana, C. (2015). The expected value of the traceability information. European Journal of Operational Research, 244(1), 176-186.
    • [3] Aker, J. C. (2010). Information from markets near and far: Mobile phones and agricultural markets in Niger. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(3), 46-59.
    • [4] Alvarez, G., Pilbeam, C., and Wilding, R. (2010). Nestl Nespresso AAA sustainable quality program: an investigation into the governance dynamics in a multi-stakeholder supply chain network. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(2), 165-182.
    • [5] Babich, V., and C. S. Tang. (2012) Managing opportunistic supplier product adulteration: Deferred payments, inspection, and combined mechanisms. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 14(2), 301314.
    • [6] Bariyo, N., and P. Evans. (2015). African farmers put hope in beer. Wall Street Journal., March 12, 2015.
    • [7] Belavina, E., & Girotra, K. (2015). Supply networks for relational sourcing. Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau.
    • [8] Berdegue, J. A., & Marchant, C. (2002). Chile: the evolution of the agricultural advisory service for small farmers: 1978-2000. Contracting for agricultural extension: international case studies and emerging practices, 21-27.
    • [9] Broll, U., Welzel, P., & Wong, K. P. (2013). Price risk and risk management in agriculture. Contemporary Economics, 7(2), 17-20
    • [11] Crawford, V. P. & Sobel, J. (1982). \Strategic Information Transmission". Econometrica 50 (6): 1431 - 1451.
    • [12] Danby, T., & Sellen, T. (2010). No Relief in Sight for the Co ee Market. Wall Street Journal, August 23, 2010.
    • [13] Devalkar, S. K., Anupindi, R., & Sinha, A. (2011). Integrated optimization of procurement, processing and trade of commodities. Operations Research 59(6), 1369- 1381.
    • [14] Fafchamps, M., & Minten, B. (2012). Impact of SMS-based agricultural information on Indian farmers. The World Bank Economic Review, 26(3), 383-414.
    • [15] Formentini M., Sodhi, M.S. & Tang, C.S. (2014), Supply chain contracts for triple bottom line bene ts in the Italian pasta industry, 21st EurOMA Conference, Palermo (Italy), June 2014.
    • [16] Gakuru, M., Winters, K., & Stepman, F. (2009). Innovative farmer advisory services using ICT. In: Cunningham, P., & Cunningham, M. (Eds). Africa perspective on the role of mobile technologies in fostering social development - IST-Africa 2009 Conference Proceedings.
    • [17] Gold, M. (2009). What is Sustainable Agriculture?. United States Department of Agriculture, Alternative Farming Systems Information Center.
    • [18] Goyal, A. (2010). Information, direct access to farmers, and rural market performance in central India. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(3), 22-45.
    • [19] Josephs, L. (2013). Co ee-Bean Price Sag as Stockpiles Build. Wall Street Journal, March 17, 2013.
    • [20] Josephs, L. (2014). Brazilian Exports Cool Co ee's Rally. Wall Street Journal, May 13, 2014.
    • [21] Kval y, O. (2006). Self-enforcing contracts in agriculture. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 33(1), 73-92.
    • [22] Lau, A. H. L., Lau, H. S., and Wang, J. C. (2008). How a dominant retailer might design a purchase contract for a newsvendor-type product with price-sensitive demand. European Journal of Operational Research, 190(2), 443-458.
    • [23] Lee, H.L. (2007). Starbucks' C.A.F.E. initiatives. Stanford Business School Case GS 54.
    • [24] Lee, H.L., Over, K., and Tang, C. S. (2013). Creating Shared Value at Nestle. SCM World Case Collection. 2013.
    • [25] Lee, H.L., Over, K., and Tang, C. S. (2015). Creating Shared Value at Nestle. Stanford Graduate School of Business Case.
    • [26] Lefevre, C., Pelle, D., Abedi, S., Martinez, R., & Thaler, P. (2010). Value of Sustainable Procurement Practices. Technical report. Pricewaterhouse Coopers in cooperation with ecoVadis and INSEAD Social Innovation Centre, Fontainebleau.
    • [27] Mittal, S., & Mehar, M. (2012). How mobile phones contribute to growth of small farmers? Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 51(3), 227.
    • [28] Pagell, M., & A. Shevchenko. (2014). Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(1), 44-55.
    • [29] Plambeck, E., and T. Taylor (2014), Supplier Evasion of a Buyer's Audit: Implications for Motivating Supplier Social and Environmental Responsibility. forthcoming, Manufacutring and Service Operations Management.
    • [30] Sodhi, M., and C.S. Tang (2014). Supply Chain Research Opportunities with the Poor as Suppliers or Distributors in Developing Countries. Production and Operations Management, 23(9), pp. 1483-1494.
    • [31] Sodhi, M. S. (2015). Conceptualizing social responsibility in operations via stakeholder resource-based view. Production and Operations Management, (forthcoming). 2g + (r y)g and the optimal g = 22 q when q=2 when q=2 > y. So, we need to examine two scenarios:
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article