LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Pitta, Demetra
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: LB1501
This study seeks to answer the question: "What kinds of mental representation do children\ud project and how may these be associated with their level of achievement in elementary\ud arithmetic?". Drawing upon theories offering some explanation for the way in which\ud arithmetical activity is transformed into numerical concepts and those that hypothesise the\ud form and quality of mental representations the study suggests that qualitatively different\ud kinds of mental representation may be associated with qualitatively different kinds of\ud arithmetical behaviour.\ud The evidence is drawn from the classification and categorisation of data from two series of\ud semi-clinical interviews carried out with children aged eight to twelve who were at extremes\ud of numerical achievement. The first, a pilot study, largely concentrated on mental\ud representations associated with numerical concepts and skills. Its results suggest that\ud mental representations projected by children may have a disposition towards different kinds\ud of mental representation which transcends arithmetical and non-arithmetical boundaries.\ud Issues raised by this study, in conjunction with a re-appraisal of the psychological\ud evidence, informed the development of the main study. With a similar sample of children\ud this considered the relationship between children's projections, reports and descriptions of\ud mental representations in numerical and non-numerical contexts and in elementary\ud arithmetic. Words, pictures, icons and symbols stimulated the projection of these\ud representations. The evidence suggests that there is indeed a disposition towards the\ud formation of particular kinds of mental representation. low achievers' projected mental\ud representations which have descriptive emphasis. 'High achievers', whilst able to do the\ud same, also project those with relational characteristics, the frequency of which increases as\ud the stimulus becomes more 'language like'. This provides them with the flexibility to\ud oscillate between descriptive and abstract levels of thought.\ud The study indicates that qualitative different thinking in number processing is closely\ud associated to a disposition towards qualitatively different kinds of mental representation. Its\ud concluding comments suggest that these differences may have some considerable\ud implication for the received belief that active methods may supply all children with a basis\ud for numerical understanding.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 4.3.1 The Disguised Nature of Mental Representations ......................... 70 4.3.2 Metacognition ................................................................. 71 4.3.3 Information Processing ......................................................
    • 4.3.4 Importing from Psychology ................................................. 72 4.3.5 A Phenomenographical Orientation ...................... • .................. 74 4.3.6 Semi-Clinical Interviewing ............................ . . .................. -77-57 4.3.7 Reliability and Validity .........................................................
    • 4.4.1 Refining the Approach .......................................................
    • 4.4.2 Evoking Mental Representations ............................................ 81 4.4.3 Developing the Verbal Item Bank .......................................... 82 4.4.4 Presenting the Verbal Item Bank ......................... 84 4.4.5 The Visual Item Bank ....................................................... 86 4.4.6 Presenting the Visual Item Bank ........................................... 88 4.4.7 The Numerical Components_ ............................................ 89 Jaworski, B. (1988). 'Is" versus "seeing as": Constructivism and the mathematics classroom'. In D. Pimm (Ed.), Mathematics, Teachers and Children. London: Hodder and Staughton.
    • Johanssen, B., Marton, F. & Svensson, L. (1985). An approach to describing learning as change between qualitatively different conceptions. In A. L. Pines & L.H.T.West (Eds), Cognitive structure and conceptual change. New York: Academic Press.
    • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Kamii, C. (1985). Young children reinvent arithmetic. New York: Teachers College Press.
    • Kaput, J. (1992). Technology in Mathematics Education. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Mathematics Teaching and Learning,.pp. 515-516 Macmillan: New York
    • Katona, G. (1967). Organising and memorisizing: Studies in the psychology of learning and teaching. New York: Hafner.
    • Kilpatrick, J. (1992). A history of research in mathematics eduction. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research in mathematics education: A Project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Macmillan: New York.
    • Logic, R. H., Gilhooly, K. J. & Wynn, V. (1994). Counting on working memory in arithmetic problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 22,395-410.
    • Lupker, S. (1985). Related effects in words and picture naming: Parrallels differences and structural implications. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language (pp 109-142). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • MacInnes, D.J. & Price, L.L. (1987). The role of imagery in information processing: Review and extensions. Journal of Consumer Research, 13,473-491.
    • Markham, E.M. (1979). Realising you don't understand: Elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies. Child Development, 50,643-655.
    • Marschark, M., Richma, C. L., Yuille, J. C. & Hunt, R. R. (1987). The role of imagery and memory: On shared and distinctive information. Psychological Bulletin, 102,28-41.
    • Mason, J.(1992). Doing and constructing mathematics in screen space. In Beth Southwell, Bob Perry and Kay Owens (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 1- 17. University of Western Sydney: Nepean, Australia
    • McDaniell, M.A. & Einstein, G.O. (1991). Bizare imagery: mnemonic benefits and theoretical implications. In R.H.Logie & M.Denis (Eds.), Mental images in human cognition. Elsevier: North Holland.
    • Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviourist. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    • Mead, G.H. (1938). The philosophy of the act. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    • Miller, G.A. (1956). The magic number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for procesing information. Psychological Review, 63,81-93.
    • Morris, P.E. (1984). The validity of subjective reports on memory. In J.E. Harris & P.E. Morris (Eds.), Everyday memory, actions and absentmindedness pp.153- 172. New York: Academic Press.
    • Oliver, A., Murray, H., & Human P. (1990). Building on young children's formal arithmetic knowledge. In G. Booker, P. Cobb & T. Mendicutti (Eds.), Proceedings of XIV International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. , Vol. III, 297-304. Mexico.
    • Opper, S. (1977). Piaget's clinical method. Journal of children's mathematical behaviour, 1(4), 90-107.
    • Paivio, A. (1979). Imagery and verbal processes. Hillsdale. N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford Psychological Series, 9. OUP: Oxford.
    • Paivio, A. (1990). Dual coding theory: retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology: Outstanding Contributions Series, 26, pp. 255-287.
    • Paivio, A., Yuille, J.C. & Rogers, T.B. (1969). Noun imagery and meaningfulness in free and serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76 (1, Part 2).
    • Phillips, W. A. (1983). Short-term visual memory. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 302,295-309.
    • Piaget, J. (1929). The Child's Conception of the World. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    • Piaget, J. (1971). Genetic Epistemology, (E. Duckworth, trans). New York: Columbia University Press.
    • Piaget, J. (1973) Comments on mathematical Education. In A. G. Howson (Ed.), Developments in Mathematical Education: Proceedings on the Second International Conference on Mathematics Education. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    • Piaget, J. (1979). The child's conception of the world. Totowa, N.J.: Littlefield, Adams & Co.
    • Piaget, J. (1985). The Equilibrium of Cognitive Structures. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking Mathematically: Communications in mathematics classrooms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    • Pine, S. & Kieran, T. (1994). Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterise it and how can we represent it? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26,165-190.
    • Pitta, D. & Gray, E. (1997). Emily and the supercalculator. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of XXI International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol.IV, pp.17-25. Lahti: Finland.
    • Presmeg, N. C. (1986a). Visualiasation in high school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6,42-46.
    • Presmeg, N.C. (1986b). Visualisation and mathematical giftedness. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17,297-311.
    • Presmeg, N.C. (1992) Preference for visual methods: An international study. In L. Miera & D,. Carraher (Eds.), Proceedings of XIX International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education., 3,58-66: Recife: Brazil.
    • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1973). What the minds eye tells the minds brain: A critique of mental imagery, Psychological Bulletin, 80,1.
    • Pylyshyn, Z. (1978). Imagery aad artificial intelligence. In W. Savage (Ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. 9). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    • Pylyshyn, Z. (1984). Computation and cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    • Quinn, J. G. & McConnell, J. (1996). Irrelevant pictures in visual working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 200-215.
    • Resnick, L.B., & Ford, W.W.(1981). The Psychology of Mathematics for Instruction. Hillsdale. N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Reynolds, A. & Wheatley, G.H. (1992). The eleobaration of images in the process of mathematics meaning making. In W. Geeslin & K. Graham (Eds.). Proceedings of XVI International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. II, pp. 242-250. Durham, New Hampshire: USA.
    • Rosch, E. (1975). Cognative representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104,192-233.
    • Roth, I., & Bruce, V. (1995). Perception and representation: Current Issues. Buckingham: OUP.
    • SCAA, (1992,1993, 1994). Mathematics Key Stage I, London: Schools Curriculum and Assessment Authority Publications.
    • SCAA, (1992,1993, 1994). Mathematics Key Stage 2, London: Schools Curriculum and Assessment Authority Publications.
    • Schoenfeld, A.H. (1979). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In A.H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp 189-215). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    • Schoenfeld, A.H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mahematics. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research in mathematics education: A Project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. pp. 334-370. Macmillan: New York.
    • Secada, G.W. (1992). Race, ethnicity, social class, language and achievement in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws, (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, New York: Macmillan.
    • Secada, G.W., Fuson, C.K. & Hall, J.W. (1983). The transition from counting-all to counting-on in addition. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14, 47-57.
    • Seron, X., Pesenti, M. Noel, M., Deloche, G. & Cornet, J. (1992). Images of numbers, or "When 98 is upper left and 6 sky blue". Cognition, 44, 159-196.
    • Sfard, A. (1989). Transition from operational to structural conception: The notion of function revisted. In G. Vergnaud, J. Rogalski, M. Arigue, (Eds.), Proceedings of XIII International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. III, pp.151-158. Paris: France.
    • Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1-36.
    • Sfard, A. & Linchevski, L. (1994). The gains and pitfalls of reification-the case of algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 191-228.
    • Siegel, L. S. & Ryan, E. B. (1989). The development of working memory in normally achieving and subtypes of learning disabled children. Child Development, 60, 973-80.
    • Siegler, R. S. (1987). The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children's addition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 250- 264.
    • Siegler, R. S. & Jenkins, E. (1989). How children discover new strategies. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Skemp, R. S. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77,20-26.
    • Skemp, R. S. (1979). Intelligence, Learning and Action: A foundation for Theory and Practice in Education. John Wiley & Sons: New York.
    • Skemp, R. S. (1986). The Psychology of Learning Mathematics, (2nd Edition). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
    • Smith, E.E. & Medin, D.L. ((1981). Categories and Concepts. Harvard University Press.
    • Solano, A.S., Presmeg, N. (1995). Visualisation as a relation of images. In D, Carraher & L. Miera (Eds.), Proceedings of XIX International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education., Vol. IV, pp. 66-73. Recife: Brazil.
    • Spearman, C.E. (1927). The Abilities of Man: Their Nature an Measurement. Macmillan: London.
    • Staats, A.W. & Lohr, J.M. (1979). Images, language, emotions, and personality: Social behaviourism's theory. Journal of Mental Imagery, 3,85-106
    • Steffe, P., von Glaserfeld, E., Richards, J., & Cobb, P. (1983). Children's Counting Types: Philosophy, Theory and Applications.. New York.
    • Steinberg, R.M. (1985). Instruction on derived fact strategies in addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16,337-355.
    • Stillman, J., Kemp, T. (1993). Visual versus auditory imagination: Image qualities, perceptual qualities, and memory. Journal of mental imagery, 17,181-194.
    • Thornton, C.A. (1990). Solution strategies: Subtraction number facts, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21,241-263.
    • Towse, J. N. & Hitch, G. J. (1995). Is there a relationship between task demand and storage in tests of working memory capacity? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 108-124.
    • Tracy, R.J., Roesner, L.S., & Kovac, R.N. (1988). The effect of visual versus audotory imagery on vividness and Memory. Journal of Mental Imagery, 12, 145-162.
    • Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and Semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organisation of memory (pp. 381-403). New York: Academic Press.
    • Tulving, E. (1990). Memory systems. In M.W. Eysenck (Ed.), The Blackwell Dictionary of Cognitive Psychology (pp. 222-223). Blackwell Publishers: Oxford.
    • Vergnaud, G. (1987). About Constructivism. In J. Bergaron, N Herscovics, & C Kieron,.(Eds.), Proceedings of the XI International Conference on Psychology of Mathematical Education, Vol. I, pp.42-54. Montreal: Canada.
    • Vergnaud, G. (1988). Theoretical Frameworks and Empirical Facts in the Psychology of Mathematics Education, In A. Hirst & K. Hirst (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Mathematical Education, pp. 29-47. Budapest: Hungary.
    • Warrington, E.K. & Shalice T. (1972). Neuropsychological evidence of visual storage in short-term memory tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24, 30-40.
    • Wheatly, G. W. (1990). Spatial sense an dmathematics learning. Arithmetic Teacher, 37,10-11.
    • White, K., Sheehan, P.W. & Ashton, R. (1977). Imagery Assessment: A survey of self report measures. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1,145-169.
    • Woloshyn, V. Willoughby, T., Wood, E. & Pressley, M. (1990). Elaborative interrogation and representational imagery facilitate adult learning of facts presented in paragraphs. Educational Psychology, 82,513-524.
    • 6 d 438?--.4?1 (Horizon.*
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article