Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Gregory-Smith, Ian (2009)
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
This thesis is structured around four empirical chapters examining related issues in corporate governance. The sample of FTSE 350 companies 1995-2005 has unique properties which are exploited to advance our understanding of the executive pay-setting process; the turnover of Chief Executives (CEOs); the market's reaction to shareholder activism and voting behaviour; and the distribution of pay within the boardroom. Chapter two assesses whether remuneration committees facilitate optimal contracting or whether CEOs are able to capture the pay-setting process and inflate their own remuneration. The findings of prior research, which have been mixed, are shown to be sensitive to the econometric specification employed. A comprehensive assessment of non-executive directors' independence is undertaken. Little evidence is found to support a rents capture model. Chapter three applies duration analysis within a competing risks framework to model the tenure and mode of exit of CEOs. The likelihood of forced departure is found to decrease sharply from the fifth year of a CEO's tenure. Some evidence is found to suggest that this is because CEOs who survive beyond year four entrench themselves in their position. Chapter four considers the impact of shareholder activism. Voting dissent appears inconsequential in terms of increasing shareholder returns, reducing CEO pay or increasing the likelihood of CEO dismissal. However, firing the CEO of a poorly performing company improves shareholder returns soon after the CEO's dismissal. Chapter five examines the structure and distribution of pay amongst board members. As a test of tournament theory, the impact of a rival's succession to CEO on the incumbent directors' compensation and likelihood of exit is examined. A rival's succession has a greater impact on the existing directors' likelihood of exit than it does on compensation.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • ABI (2003): “Principles and Guidelines on Remuneration,” Discussion paper, Association of British Insurers.
    • ABI (2006): “Executive Remuneration - ABI Guidelines on Policies and Practices,” Discussion paper, Association of British Insurers.
    • ABI, AND NAPF (1999): “Responsible Voting - A joint ABI - NAPF Statement,” Discussion paper, Association of British Insurers and National Association of Pension Funds.
    • ABREVAYA, J. (2002): “Ladder Tournaments and Underdogs: Lessons from Professional Bowling,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 47(1), 87-101.
    • ADAMS, R. B., AND D. FERREIRA (2007): “A Theory of Friendly Boards,” The Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217-250.
    • ADMATI, A. R., P. PFLEIDERER, AND J. ZECHNER (1994): “Large Shareholder Activism, Risk Sharing, and Financial Market Equilibrium,” The Journal of Political Economy, 102(6), 1097-1130.
    • AITC (2003): “Code of Corporate Governance,” Discussion paper, Association of Investment Trust Companies.
    • ALLGOOD, S., AND K. FARRELL (2003): “The Match between CEO and Firm,” The Journal of Business, 76(2), 317-341.
    • ANDERSON, R., AND J. BIZJAK (2003): “An empirical examination of the role of the CEO and the compensation committee in structuring executive pay,” Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(7), 1323-1348.
    • ARELLANO, M., AND S. BOND (1991): “Some tests of specification for panal data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations,” Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-298.
    • ARELLANO, M., AND O. BOVER (1995): “Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models,” Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.
    • AUDAS, R., S. DOBSON, AND J. GODDARD (1999): “Organizational performance and managerial turnover,” Managerial and Decision Economics, 20(6), 305-318.
    • BAKER, G., M. JENSEN, AND K. MURPHY (1988): “Compensation and Incentives: Practice vs Theory,” Journal of Finance, 43, 593-616.
    • BARRO, J., AND R. BARRO (1990): “Pay, Performance and Turnover of Bank CEOs,” Journal of Labour Economics, 8, 448-481.
    • BEATTY, R. P., AND E. J. ZAJAC (1987): “CEO Change and Firm Performance in Large Corporations: Succession Effects and Manager Effects,” Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), 305-318.
    • BEBCHUK, L. A. (2005): “The case for increasing shareholder power,” Harvard Law Review, 118(3), 833-917.
    • BEBCHUK, L. A., K. M. CREMERS, AND U. C. PEYER (2007): “Pay Distribution in the Top Executive Team,” SSRN eLibrary.
    • BEBCHUK, L. A., AND J. FRIED (2003): “Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 71-92.
    • BECHT, M., J. FRANKS, C. MAYER, AND S. ROSSI (2008): “Returns to Shareholder Activism. Evidence from a clinical study of the Hermes UK Focus Fund,” Review of Financial Studies, forthcoming.
    • BECKER, B., AND M. HUSELID (1992): “The Incentive Effects of Tournament Compensation Systems,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 336-50.
    • BEDI, J., A. J. RICHARDS, AND P. TENNANT (2003): “The Characteristics and Trading Behavior of Dual-listed Companies,” SSRN eLibrary.
    • BENITO, A., AND M. CONYON (1999): “The Governance of Directors' Pay: Evidence from UK Companies,” Journal of Management and Governance, 3, 117-136.
    • BLACK, B. S., AND J. C. COFFEE (1994): “Hail Britannia? Institutional investor behavior under limited regulation,” Michigan Law Review, 92, 1997-2087.
    • BLACK, F., AND M. SCHOLES (1973): “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities,” Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-654.
    • BLUNDELL, R., AND S. BOND (1998): “Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models,” Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.
    • BOEKER, W., AND J. GOODSTEIN (1993): “Performance and Successor Choice: The Moderating Effects of Governance and Ownership.,” Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 172.
    • BOGNANNO, M. L. (2001): “Corporate Tournaments.,” Journal of Labor Economics, 19(2), 290-315.
    • BONET, R., AND M. CONYON (2005): Corporate Governance: Accountability, Enterprise and International Comparisonschap. Compensation Committees and Executive Compensation: Evidence from Publicly Traded UK Firms, pp. 137-153. John Wiley & Sons.
    • BONNIER, K.-A., AND R. F. BRUNER (1989): “An analysis of stock price reaction to management change in distressed firms,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11(1), 95-106.
    • BRICKLEY, J. A. (2003): “Empirical research on CEO turnover and firm-performance: a discussion,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36(1-3), 227-233.
    • CARLETON, W. T., J. M. NELSON, AND M. S. WEISBACH (1998): “The influence of institutions on corporate governance through private negotiations: Evidence from TIAA-CREF,” Journal of Finance, 53(4), 1335-1362.
    • CHAN, W. (1996): “External Recruitment versus Internal Promotion,” Journal of Labor Economics, 14(4), 555-570.
    • CHHAOCHHARIA, V., AND Y. GRINSTEIN (2007): “Corporate Governance and Firm Value - The Impact of the 2002 Governance Rules,” Journal of Finance, 62(4), 1789- 1825.
    • CONYON, M. J. (1997): “Corporate Governance and executive compensation,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15, 493-509.
    • CONYON, M. J. (2008): “Compensation Consultants and Executive Pay: Evidence from the United States and the United Kingdom,” SSRN eLibrary.
    • CONYON, M. J., AND A. FLOROU (2002): “Top executive dismissal, ownership and corporate performance.,” Accounting and Business Research, 32(4), 209-225.
    • CONYON, M. J., AND D. LEECH (1994): “Top Pay, Company Performance and Corporate Governance,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 56(3), 229-47.
    • CONYON, M. J., S. PECK, AND G. SADLER (2000): “Econometric Modelling of UK Ececutive Compensation,” Journal of Economic Literature, 26(9), 3-20.
    • CONYON, M. J., AND S. I. PECK (1998): “Board control, Remunerartion Committees and Top Management Compensation.,” Academy of Management Journal, 41(2), 146- 157.
    • CONYON, M. J., S. I. PECK, AND G. V. SADLER (2001): “Corporate Tournaments and Executive Compensation: Evidence from the UK,” Strategic Management Journal, 22, 805-815.
    • CONYON, M. J., AND G. V. SADLER (2001): “Executive pay, tournaments and corporate performance in UK firms,” International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(2), 141- 168.
    • CORE, J., W. GUAY, AND T. RUSTICUS (2006): “Does Weak Governance Cause Weak Stock Returns? An Examination of Firm Operating Performance and Analysts,” Journal of Finance, 61, 655-687.
    • CORE, J., R. HOLTHAUSEN, AND D. LARCKER (1999): “Corportate goverance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance,” Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 371-406.
    • COUGHLAN, A. T., AND R. M. SCHMIDT (1985): “Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performance : An empirical investigation,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1-3), 43-66.
    • COX, D. R. (1972): “Regression models and life-tables (with discussion).,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 34, 248-275.
    • COX, J. C., S. ROSS, AND M. RUBINSTEIN (1979): “Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach,” Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 224-64.
    • DAHYA, J., A. LONIE, AND D. POWER (1998): “Ownership Structure, Firm Performance and Top Executive Change: An Analysis of UK Firms,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 25(10), 1089-1118.
    • DAHYA, J., J. MCCONNELL, AND N. TRAVLOS (2002): “The Cadbury Committee, Corporate Performance, and Top Management Turnover,” The Journal of Finance, 57(1), 461-483.
    • DAILY, C., J. JOHNSON, A. ELLSTRAND, AND D. DALTON (1998): “Compensation Committee Composition as a Determinant of CEO Compensation,” Academy of Management Journal, 41(2), 209-220.
    • DAINES, R. (2001): “Does Delaware Law Improve Firm Value?,” Journal of Financial Economics, 62, 525-558.
    • DALTON, D. R., AND I. F. KESNER (1985): “Organisational Performance as an Antecedent of Inside/Outside Chief Executive Sucession: An Empirical Assessment.,” Academy of Management Journal, 28(4), 749-762.
    • DAVIES, G., T. PLATTS, AND R. LEWIS (2008): “Shareholder activism: There's a lot of it about,” Practical Law Company Magazine, 19.
    • DEDMAN, E. (2003): “Executive turnover in UK firms: the impact of Cadbury.,” Accounting and Business Research, 33(1), 33-50.
    • DEDMAN, E., AND S. LIN (2002): “Shareholder wealth effects of CEO departures: evidence from the UK,” Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(1), 81-104.
    • DEMSETZ, H., AND K. LEHN (1985): “The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences,” The Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1155-1177.
    • DIKOLLI, S. S. (2001): “Agent Employment Horizons and Contracting Demand for Forward-Looking Performance Measures,” Journal of Accounting Research, 39(3), 481-494.
    • DITTMAR, A., AND J. MAHRT-SMITH (2007): “Corporate Governance and the Value of Cash Holdings,” Journal of Financial Economics, 83, 599-634.
    • DRAGO, R., AND G. GARVEY (1998): “Incentives for Helping on the Job: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of Labour Economics, 16(1), 1-25.
    • DYE, R. A. (1984): “The Trouble with Tournaments,” Economic Inquiry, 12, 147-149.
    • ENGEL, E., R. M. HAYES, AND X. WANG (2003): “CEO turnover and properties of accounting information,” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36, 197-226.
    • ERIKSSON, T. (1999): “Executive Compensation and Tournament Theory: Empirical Tests on Danish Data,” Journal of Labor Economics, 17(2), 262-280.
    • GEDDES, R., AND H. D. VINOD (2002): “CEO Tenure, Board Composition, and Regulation,” Journal of Regulatory Economics, 21(2), 217-35, available at http://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/regeco/v21y2002i2p217-35.html.
    • GEDDES, R. R., AND H. D. VINOD (1997): “CEO Age and Outside Directors: A Hazard Analysis,” Review of Industrial Organization, V12(5), 767-780.
    • GOMEZ-MEJIA, L., AND R. M. WISEMAN (1997): “Reframing Execufive Compensation: An Assessment and Outlook,” Journal of Management, 23(3), 291-374.
    • GOMPERS, P., J. ISHII, AND A. METRICK (2003): “Corporate Governance and Equity Prices,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 188, 107-155.
    • GREENBURY, R. (1995): “Directors Remuneration: Report of a Study Group Chaired by Sir Richard Greenbury,” Discussion paper, Confederation of British Industry, London.
    • GREGG, P., S. JEWELL, AND I. TONKS (2005): “Executive Pay and Performance in the UK 1994-2002,” Paper provided by Department of Economics, University of Bristol, UK in its series The Centre for Market and Public Organisation with number 05/122.
    • GREGG, P., S. MACHIN, AND S. SZYMANSKI (1993): “The Disappearing Relationship Between Directors' Pay and Corporate Performance,” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 31(1), 1-9.
    • HALL, B. J., AND K. J. MURPHY (2003): “The Trouble with Stock Options,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 49-70.
    • HAMBRICK, D. C., AND S. FINKELSTEIN (1995): “The Effects of Ownership Structure on Conditions at the Top: The Case of CEO Pay Raises,” Strategic Management Journal, 16(3), 175.
    • HAMPEL, S. R. (1998): “Committee on Corporate Governance,” Discussion paper, GEE, London.
    • HARRIS, D., AND C. HELFAT (1997): “Specificity of CEO human capital and compensation,” Strategic Management Journal, 18(11), 895-920.
    • HART, O. (1995): “Corporate Governance: Some Theory and Implications,” Economic Journal, 105, 678-689.
    • HERMALIN, B. E., AND M. S. WEISBACH (2003): “Boards of Directors as an Engdogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 9, 7-26.
    • HIGGS, D. (2003): “Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Non-executive directors,” Discussion paper, Department of Trade and Industry, London.
    • JENSEN, M., AND K. MURPHY (1990): “Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives,” Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225-263.
    • JENSEN, M. C., AND W. H. MECKLING (1976): “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
    • POUND, J. (1992): “Raiders, targets and politics: The history and future of American coporate control,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 5, 6-18.
    • SATTINGER, M. (1993): “Assignment Models of the Distribution of Earnings,” Journal of Economic Literature, 31(2), 831-880.
    • YERMACK, D. (1996): “Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors,” Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185-211.
    • YOUNG, S. (2000): “The Increasing Use of Non-Executive Directors: Its Impact on UK Board Structure and Governance Arrangements.,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 27(9/10), 1311 - 1342.
    • ZAJAC, E. J. (1990): “CEO Selection, Succession, Compensation and Firm Performance: A Theoretical Integration and Empirical Analysis,” Strategic Management Journal (1986-1998), 11(3), 217-230.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article