Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Hammond, Michael; Alotaibi, Bader Omran B. (2016)
Publisher: Routledge
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: LB2300
This paper explores the contribution of theory to understanding the take-up of ICT and, in particular, it describes how Valsiner’s three zones framework came to be used in a study of lecturers in Saudi higher education institutions. The paper describes the value of theory and, in the process, illustrates some of the approaches taken in the literature on teachers’ use of ICT. The challenges faced in theorising are also covered. The paper then gives the background to a study of ICT use among university lecturers before moving to a discussion of methodology and presentation of key findings. Next, attention shifts to explaining key aspects of Valsiner’s zones framework and showing how this framework was applied to explain the modest but differentiated use of ICT across eight institutions. Finally, the paper discusses the strengths and limitations of the zones framework and highlights some of the wider challenges which theorisation poses
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Barzel, B. (2007) New Technology? New ways of teaching - No time left for that! International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 77-86.
    • Becker, H.J. (1994) How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: implications for realising the potential of computers in schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26 (3), 291-321.
    • Berger, M. (2009). Designing Tasks for CAS Classrooms: challenges and opportunities for teachers and researchers. Megatrend University, Serbia: CAME 6, pp. 5-10.
    • Billett, S. (2001) Knowing in practice: re-conceptualising vocational expertise. Learning and Instruction, 11(6), 431-452.
    • Billett, S. E. (2010) Learning Through Practice: Models, traditions, orientations and approaches. London: Springer.
    • Blanton, M., Westbrook, S. and Carter, G. (2005) Using Valsiner's zone theory to interpret teaching practices in mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8 (1), 5-33.
    • Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2008) Why hasn't technology disrupted academics' teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory. Computers & Education, 50(2), 475-490.
    • Blin F and Appel C. (2011) Computer supported collaborative writing in practice: An activity theoretical study. CALICO Journal 28 (2),473-497.
    • Borg, S. & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2012) University teacher educators' research engagement: Perspectives from Saudi Arabia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), 347- 356.
    • Bretscher, N. (2008) Dynamic geometry software: The teacher's role in facilitating instrumental genesis. In (Ed)M. Joubert Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 28(3), 1-6.
    • Buteau, C. et al. (2010) Integrating computer algebra systems in post-secondary mathematics education: Preliminary results of a literature review. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 17(2), 57-68.
    • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007) Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.
    • Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993) A cultural-historic approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
    • Galligan, L. (2008) Using Valsiner. In (eds) M. Goos, R. Brown, and K. Makar Navigating currents and Charting Directions. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 1 Brisbane: MERGA, 211-218.
    • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Ca, USA: Sociology Press.
    • Goodband, J., Solomon, Y., Samuels, P., Lawson, D., & Bhakta, R. (2012) Limits and potentials of social networking in academia: Case study of the evolution of a mathematics Facebook community. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(3), 236-252.
    • Goos, M. (2005) A socio cultural analysis of learning to teach. In (eds) H. Chick and J. Vincent Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3. Melbourne: PME, 49-56.
    • Goos, M. (2013) Sociocultural perspectives in research on and with mathematics teachers: a zone theory approach. ZDM, 45(4), 521-533.
    • Goos, M. and Bennison, A. (2008) Surveying the technology landscape: Teachers' use of technology in secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(3), 102-130.
    • Gouseti, G. (2010) Web 2.0 and education: not just another case of hype, hope and disappointment? Learning, Media and Technology, 35(3), 351-356.
    • Graham, C. (2011) Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953-1960.
    • Grix, J. (2002) Introducing students to the generic terminology of social research, Politics, 22, (3), 175-186
    • Haciomeroglu, E., Aspinwall, A. and Presmeg, N. (2010) Contrasting cases of calculus students' understanding of derivative graphs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), pp. 152-176.
    • Hammersley M. (2004) Action research: a contradiction in terms? Oxford Review of Education 30 (2), 165-181.
    • Hammond, M., Reynolds, L., & Ingram, J. (2011) How and why do student teachers use ICT? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 191-203.
    • Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008) The impact of primary school teachers' educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499-1509.
    • Hodkinson P and Hodkinson H. (2003) Individuals, Communities of Practice and the Policy Context: School teachers' learning in their workplace. Studies in Continuing Education 25 (1), 3-21.
    • Hodkinson, P., & Hodkinson, H. (2004) The significance of individuals' dispositions in workplace learning: a case study of two teachers. Journal of Education and Work, 17(2), 167-182.
    • Hodkinson, P., Biesta, G., & James, D. (2008) Understanding learning culturally: Overcoming the dualism between social and individual views of learning. Vocations and Learning, 1(1), 27-47.
    • Hung, D., Chee, T.-S., Hedberg, J., & Thiam Seng, K. (2005) A framework for fostering a community of practice: scaffolding learners through an evolving continuum. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 159-176.
    • Johannesen, M., & Habib, L. (2010) The role of professional identity in patterns of use of multiple‐choice assessment tools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(1), 93-109.
    • McDougall, A., & Jones, A. (2006) Theory and history, questions and methodology: current and future issues in research into ICT in education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 15(3), 353-360.
    • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006) Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
    • Morrison, K. (2005) Structuration theory, habitus and complexity theory: Elective affinities or old wine in new bottles? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(3), 311-326.
    • Mumtaz, S. (2000) Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: a review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319-342.
    • Neumann, D., Neumann, M., & Hood, M. (2011) Evaluating computer-based simulations, multimedia and animations that help integrate blended learning with lectures in first year statistics. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(2), 274-289.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article