Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Bourke, Jane, Dr.
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: RA
In this thesis we explore innovation in general practices in Ireland. Drawing on an\ud encompassing equilibrium, disequilibrium and learning-by-using model of adoption,\ud we examine the influences of general practitioner (GP) and practice characteristics,\ud strategic behaviour, learning and knowledge spillovers, and cumulative learning\ud from previous adoption decisions on the perceived benefits of adopting and using\ud innovations in general practices. Ours is the first application of this theoretical\ud framework to timing of adoption, multiple technology adoption and intensity of\ud adoption decision-making in a health care setting. Our examination focuses on three\ud innovations, prescription drugs, medical equipment and Information and\ud Communications Technology (ICT).\ud Our analysis is based on two data sources, a secondary dataset which brings together\ud GPs prescribing history over a 4½ year time period with information on the\ud characteristics of the 625 GPs themselves, and a cross-sectional primary dataset\ud which provides us with information for 601 general practices concerning practice\ud structure and use of medical equipment and ICT. Employing duration analysis,\ud multivariate Probit and ordered Probit econometric techniques, we examine the\ud adoption, use and intensity of use of prescription drugs, medical equipment and ICT\ud respectively.\ud Irish GPs exhibit notable innovative behaviour with respect to prescribing innovation\ud and practice development. Our research demonstrates that Irish GPs respond to\ud informational stimuli with respect to adoption and use of new prescription drugs,\ud medical equipment and ICT. Furthermore, Irish GPs are incentivised by commercial\ud and market considerations. In addition, we find the extent which a practice adopts\ud technologies and learns from that experience influences both ensuing prescribing and\ud investment decision-making. Our empirical findings support an economic approach\ud to examining decision-making in a health care setting and the application of our\ud encompassing theoretical model to examinations of adoption and use of innovations\ud by health care professionals.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • O'KELLY, F., O'KELLY, M., NÍ SHÚILLEABHÁIN, A. & O'DOWD, T. 2008. A National Census of Irish General Practice Training Programme Graduates: 1997-2003. Dublin :Trinity College Dublin & Irish College of General Practitioners.
    • PHILIPS, P. A., ROBERTSON, K. W. & KEEL, K. G. 1991. Does Questionnaire Color Affect Survey Response Rates. Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, 484- 488.
    • PROSSER, H., ALMOND, S. & WALLEY, T. 2009. Influences on GPs' decision to prescribe new drugs - the importance of who says what. Family Practice, 20, 61-8.
    • ROGERS, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations, New York, Free Press.
    • ROSENBERG, N. 1972. Factors affecting the diffusion of technology. Explorations in Economic History, 10, 3-33.
    • ROSENBERG, N. 1982. Inside the Black Box:Technology and Economics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    • RYAN, B. & GROSS, N. C. 1943. THe Diffusion of Hybrid Seed Corn in Two Iowa Communities. Rural Sociology, 8, 15-24.
    • SCHUMPETER, J. A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy New York, Harper and Brothers.
    • SCOTT, A. 2000. Economics of General Pratice. In: ANTHONY, J. C. J. (ed.) Handbook of Health Economic. Elsevier.
    • STONEMAN, P. & KWON, M.-J. 1994. The Diffusion of Multiple Process Technologies. The Economic Journal, 104, 420-431.
    • STONEMAN, P. & TOIVANEN, O. 1997. The Diffusion of Multiple Technologies: An Empirical Study. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5, 1-17.
    • TAMBLYN, R., MCLEOD, P., HANLEY, J. A., GIRARD, N. & HURLEY, J. 2003. Physician and Practice Characteristics Associated with the Early Utilisation of New Prescription Drugs. Medical Care, 41, 895-908.
    • THISTLEHWAITE, J. E., AJJAWI, R. & ASLANI, P. 2010. The Decision to Prescribe: Influences and Choice. InnovAiT, 3, 237-243.
    • THOMAS, S. & LAYTE, R. 2009. General Practitioner Care. In: LAYTE, R. (ed.) Projecting the Impact of Demographic Change on the Demand for and Delivery of Health Care in Ireland. Dublin: Economic and Social Research Institute.
    • TILSON, L., O'LEARY, A., USHER, C. & BARRY, M. 2010. Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation in Ireland: A Review of the Process. Pharmacoeconomics, 28, 307-322.
    • THOMAS, S., NORMAND, C. & SMITH, S. 2008. Social Health Insurance: Further Options for Ireland. Dublin: Trinity College Dublin.
    • WALLEY, T., MURPHY, M., CODD, M., JOHNSTON, Z. & QUIRKE, T. 2001. Effects of a monetary incentive on primary care prescribing in Ireland. European Journal of General Practice, 7, 92-98.
    • WATHEN, B. & DEAN, T. 2004. An evaluation of the impact of NICE guidance on GP prescribing. British Journal of General Practice, 54, 103-107.
    • WILLIAMSON, P. M. 1975. The Adoption of New Drugs by Doctors Practising in Group and Solo Practice. Social Science and Medicine, 9, 233-236.
    • WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION. 2008. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology [Online]. Oslo: Norweigen Institute of Public Health. Available: http://www.whocc.no/ [Accessed 10 October 2008].
    • WREN, M.-A. 2003. Unhealthy State: Anatomy of a Sick Society, Dublin, New Island.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article