Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Haynes, Barry
Publisher: Emerald
Languages: English
Types: Article

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop a validated theoretical framework for the evaluation of office productivity, which includes components to represent both the physical and the behavioural environment. It is proposed that by adopting such an approach, insights into the dynamic nature, or connectivity, of office environments can be established. The main objective of this paper is to investigate the effects of the office environment on its occupants' perceived productivity.


Design/methodology/approach – The study's strength is that it is based on two sizable data sets. The data collected consists of data about the physical characteristics of the office environment and data pertaining to the behavioural environment.


Findings – Results are analysed for specific work patterns, to establish meaning and relationships. In all of the four work patterns evaluated it was found that interaction was perceived to be the component to have the most positive affect on productivity and distraction was perceived to have the most negative. It is proposed that the results in this paper will provide support for the hypothesis that it is the behavioural components of the office environment that have the greatest impact on office productivity.


Research limitations/implications – This research establishes that to truly appreciate office productivity there is a need to further understand the behavioural environment. Whilst this research evaluates different work styles and office productivity, there is a possibility to extend this to investigate personality and team role types.


Originality/value – This study establishes that it is the behavioural environment that has the greatest impact on office productivity. It demonstrates that it is the dynamic elements of the office environment, interaction and distraction that are perceived as having the greatest positive and negative influences on self assessed productivity.

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Becker, F. and Pearce, A. (2003) "Considering corporate real estate and human resource factors in an integrated cost model", Journal of Corporate Real Estate, vol. 5, no. 3. pp. 221-241.
    • Bootle, R. and Kalyan, S. (2002) Property in business - a waste of space? The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, London.
    • Bradley, S. (2002) "What's working: Briefing and evaluating workplace performance improvement", Journal of Corporate Real Estate, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 150-159.
    • Brennan, A., Chugh, J. and Kline, T. (2002) "Traditional versus open office design: A longitudinal field study", Environment and Behavior, vol. 34,no. 3, pp. 279-299.
    • Clark, L., Haynes, B. P., Pinder, J., and Price, I. (2004) "The boundaries of workplace evaluation", Futures II in Property and Facilities Management, London.
    • Clements-Croome, D. (2005) Creating The Productive Workplace. E & FN Spon, London.
    • Downer, B. (2001) Does Informal Teleworking Benefit the Employee's? MBA Dissertation, Sheffield Hallam University.
    • Dunleavy, P. (2003) Authoring a PhD Palgrave MacMillan, New York.
    • Eltringham, M. (1998) "Interesting Times - putting people at the heart of change", Space Management no. February, pp. 24-26.
    • Haynes, B.P (2005) Workplace Connectivity: A study of its impact on self-assessed productivity. PhD Thesis, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield.
    • Haynes, B.P (2007a) “Office productivity: a theoretical framework”, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, vol. 9, no.2. pp 97-110.
    • Haynes, B.P (2007b) “Office productivity: a shift from cost reduction to human contribution”, Facilities, vol. 25, no.11/12. pp 452-462.
    • Haynes, B.P (2007c) “The impact of the behavioural environment on office productivity”, Journal of Facilities Management, vol. 5, no.3. pp 158-171.
    • Haynes, B. P. and Price, I. (2004) "Quantifying the complex adaptive workplace", Facilities, vol. 22,no. 1, pp. 8-18.
    • Haynes, B., Matzdorf, F., Nunnington, N., Ogunmakin, C., Pinder, J. and Price, I. (2000) Does property benefit occupiers? An evaluation of the literature, Report No. 1, http://www.occupier.org.
    • Heerwagen, J. H., Kampschroer, K., Powell, K. M., and Loftness, V. (2004) "Collaborative knowledge work environments", Building Research and Information, vol. 32,no. 6, pp. 510-528.
    • Hurst, D. K. (1995) Crisis & Renewal : Meeting the Challenge of Organizational Change, Harvard Business Press, Cambridge MA.
    • Hussey J and Hussey R (1997) Business Research. A practical guide for undergraduate and postgraduate students, Macmillan Press Ltd, London.
    • Laframboise, D., Nelson, R. L., and Schmaltz, J. (2003) "Managing resistance to change in workplace accommodation projects", Journal of Facilities Management, vol. 1,no. 5, pp. 306-321.
    • Laing, A., Duffy, F., Jaunzens, D., and Willis, S. (1998) New Environments for Working: The redesign of offices and the environmental systems for new ways of working, E and FN Spon, London.
    • Leaman, A. and Bordass, W. (2000)" Productivity in buildings: the 'killer' variables", in Creating The Productive Workplace, D. Clements-Croome, ed., E and FN Spon, London.
    • Mawson, A. (2002) The Workplace and its Impact on Productivity, Advanced Workplace AAAssociates, London, 4.Publication No. 8, http://www.occupier.org.
    • Nathan, M. and Doyle, J. (2002) The State of the Office: The politics and geography of working space, Industrial Society, London.
    • Olson, J. (2002) "Research about office workplace activities important to US business - And how to support them", Journal of Facilities Management, vol. 1,no. 1, pp. 31- 47.
    • Oseland, N. (1999) Environmental Factors affecting office worker performance: A review of evidence; Technical Memoranda TM24: CIBSE, London.
    • Oseland, N. (2004) "Occupant feedback tools of the office productivity network". http://www.officeproductivity.co.uk
    • Peterson, T. O. and Beard, J. W. (2004) "Workplace technology's impact on individual privacy and team interaction". Team Performance Management, vol. 10,no. 7/8, pp. 163-172.
    • Pugsley, D. and Haynes, B. P. (2002) "An alternative use of space in government office accommodation", Facilities, vol. 20,no. 1/2, pp. 34-40.
    • Sims, W. (2000) "Team space: planning and managing environments to support team work", International Journal of Facilities Management, vol. 1,no. 1, pp. 21-33.
    • Steele, F. (1981) The sense of Place, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
    • Turner, G. and Myerson, J. (1998) New workspace, new culture: Office design as a catalyst for change, Gower Publishing Limited, Aldershot.
    • Ward, V. and Holtham, C.W (2000) "The role of private and public spaces in knowledge management", Knowledge Management: Concepts and Controversies, Conference proceedings, University of Warwick, Coventry, available at www Sparknow.net
    • Whitley, T. D. R., Makin, P. J., and Dickson, D. J. (1996) "Job Satisfaction and Locus of Control: Impact on Sick Building Syndrome and Self-Reported Productivity", 7th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Nagoya, Japan.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article