Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Citron, Francesca M. M. (2011)
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: QZ
Emotion is characterised by two-dimensions: emotional valence\ud describes the extent to which an emotion is positive or negative, and\ud arousal represents its intensity. Emotional content of verbal material\ud affects cognitive processing, although research on word recognition has\ud only recently taken emotion into account, primarily focusing on valence,\ud while neglecting arousal.\ud \ud The present work aimed to disentangle the effects of valence and\ud arousal during a lexical decision task, using reaction times (RTs), event-related\ud potentials (ERPs) and BOLD responses in an event-related fMRI\ud design. These methods were chosen to determine when affective\ud features have an effect, and which neural systems are involved.\ud \ud The material for three experiments was based on a word corpus\ud created by collecting ratings for emotional and lexico-semantic\ud features. A first and novel finding was that arousal interacted with\ud valence. Specifically, lexical decision times were slower for high-arousal\ud positive stimuli (PH) and low-arousal negative ones (NL) compared to\ud low-arousal positive (PL) and high arousal negative (NH) stimuli.\ud \ud ERPs also showed an interaction between 200-300 ms on the early\ud posterior negativity (EPN), a component which is sensitive to emotional\ud stimuli. At this processing stage people access their mental lexicon. Its\ud amplitude was greater for PH and NL words, suggesting a higher\ud processing load for conflicting stimuli. Positive valence and low arousal\ud elicit an approach schema, whereas negative valence and high arousal\ud elicit an avoidance schema (Robinson, Storbeck, Meier & Kirkeby, 2004).\ud \ud BOLD responses showed a similar interaction in the insula\ud bilaterally, with increased activation for PH and NL words. This region is\ud associated with integration of information on visceral states with\ud higher-order cognitive and emotional processing, suggesting higher\ud difficulty in integrating conflicting stimuli.\ud \ud Taken together, these studies indicate that emotion affects word\ud processing during lexical access, and models of word recognition need\ud to take into account both valence and arousal.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Funded by projects

Cite this article