Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Lavergne, Carrie; Taylor, Amy; Gillies, Carol; Barisic, Vanessa (2015)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article

Purpose - \ud Cancer Care Ontario has mandated that all health care professionals working within oncology centres in Ontario should routinely screen and address symptoms of anxiety and depression in cancer patients. This study aims to assess the informational needs of radiation therapists (RTs) concerning the discussion and management of anxiety and depression symptoms in patients receiving radiation therapy treatment. It will also attempt to determine whether RTs believe that reviewing patients' self-reported symptoms should be included as part of their routine patient assessment.

\ud \ud

Methods - \ud A questionnaire was initially piloted at the host institution to six randomly chosen RTs and then sent via e-mail to all radiation therapists practising in Ontario, Canada (N = 921). The online questionnaire consisted of multiple choice questions and was divided into the following four themes: (1) RT comfort levels surrounding the topics of anxiety and depression; (2) management of anxiety and depression in cancer patients; (3) further education needed/requested in anxiety and depression symptom management; and (4) the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). Data analyses included the calculation of means and two sample two-sided t tests to examine the relationships between various demographics and responses.

\ud \ud

Results - \ud \ud RTs feel more comfortable in the discussion of issues surrounding anxiety when compared with depression. The most common positive factor affecting RTs' comfort levels addressing emotional distress is previous experience with patients who have expressed these symptoms; whereas, the most common adverse factor affecting comfort levels is the lack of education regarding emotional distress. Eighty-seven percent of RTs would like further education surrounding anxiety and depression symptom management. Seventy-eight percent of RTs agree that ESAS is an important tool for symptom management; however, only 16% actually use this tool in their clinical practice.

\ud \ud

Conclusions - \ud Although RTs within Ontario feel fairly comfortable addressing anxiety and depression symptoms, they have indicated that further education regarding these topics would be useful. Further research into seamlessly incorporating ESAS into RTs' daily practice should be considered.

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Watanabe S, Nekolaichuk C, Beaumont C, Mawani A. The Edmonton symptom assessment system--what do patients think? Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(6):675-683.
    • 2. Howell D, Keller-Olaman S, Oliver T, et al. A pan-Canadian practice guideline: Screening, assessment and care of psychosocial distress (depression, anxiety) in adults with cancer. Toronto: Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Cancer Journey Action Group) and the Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology; August 2010.
    • 3. Ryan H, Schofield P, Cockburn J, et al. How to recognize and manage psychological distress in cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer Care. 2005;14(1):7-15.
    • 4. Zabora J, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Curbow B, Hooke C, Piantadosi S. The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Pscyho-Oncology. 2001;10:19-28.
    • 5. Howell D, Currie S, Mayo S, et al. A pan-Canadian clinical practice guideline: Assessment of psychosocial health care needs of the adult cancer patient. Toronto: Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Cancer Journey Action Group) and the Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology; May 2009.
    • 6. Halkett GKB, Cox J, Anderson C, Heard R. Establishing research priorities for Australian radiation therapists: What patient care priorities need to be addressed? European Journal of Cancer Care. 2012;21(1):31-40.
    • 7. Halkett GKB, Kristjanson LJ. Patients' perspectives on the role of radiation therapists. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;69(1-3):76-83.
    • 9. Cancer Care Ontario. Ontario cancer plan. https://www.cancercare.on.ca/about/initiatives/ocp/. Updated 2011. Accessed March 16, 2013.
    • 10. Halkett G, Merchant S, Jiwa M, et al. Effective communication and information provision in radiotherapy - the role of radiation therapists. Journal or Radiotherapy in Practice. 2010;9:3-16.
    • 11. Hulley L, Cashell A, Rosewall T. Communicating with emotional patients: Thoughts, skills and influencing factors for Ontario radiation therapists. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (conference abstract). 2013;44(1):45.
    • 12. Bagha S, Macedo A, Jacks L, et al. The utility of the Edmonton symptom assessment system in screening for anxiety and depression. European Journal of Cancer Care. 2013;22:60-69.
    • 13. Maamoun J, Fitch M, Barker R, et al. Results of a radiation therapist opinion survey identifying, measuring and addressing radiation therapy patient supportive care needs. Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences. 2009;40(1):24-31.
    • 14. Mitchell A, Ferguson DW, Gill J, Paul J, Symonds P. Depression and anxiety in long-term cancer survivors compared with spouses and healthy controls: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Oncology. 2013;14(8):721-732.
    • 15. Linden W, Vodermaier A, MacKenzie R, Greig D. Anxiety and depression after cancer diagnosis: Prevalence rates by cancer type, gender, and age. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2012;141:343-351.
    • 16. Mackenzie LJ, Carey ML, Sanson-Fisher RW, D'Este CA. Psychological distress in cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy treatment. Supportive Care Cancer. 2013;21:1043- 1051.
    • 17. Gil F, Costa G, Hilker I, Benito L. First anxiety, afterwards depression: Psychological distress in cancer patients at diagnosis and after medical treatment. Stress & Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress. 2012;28(5):362-367.
    • 18. Fawzy FI. Psychosocial interventions for patients with cancer: What works and what doesn't. European Journal of Cancer. 1999;35(14):1559-1564.
    • 19. Oktay J, Nedjat-Haiem F, Davis C, Kern KC. Distress screening: Experiences of oncology social workers. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 2012;30(6):652-666.
    • 20. Tuinman MA, Gazendam-Donofrio SM, Hoekstra-Weebers JE. Screening and referral for psychosocial distress in oncologic practice. Cancer. 2008;113(4):870-878.
    • 21. Turner J, Kelly B, Clarke D, et al. A randomised trial of a psychosocial intervention for cancer patients integrated into routine care: The PROMPT study (promoting optimal outcomes in mood through tailored psychosocial therapies). BMC Cancer. 2011;11(48).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article