LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Edwards, Peter A.
Languages: English
Types: Unknown
Subjects:
Many Koreans not only feel strongly motivated to study English but they also enthusiastically pursue learning the language, and yet when real contact situations arise in which English could be used, many Koreans remain unwilling to do so. Better understanding this phenomenon could benefit not only Koreans but also other groups of people who see great value in learning a language but undercut their own efforts by avoiding opportunities to use it. Through a series of interviews leading to a large quantitative study, this research investigates some underlying factors which influence Korean learners' decision over whether to use English in a particular situation. The main findings suggest that the quality and quantity of previous contact with the non-Korean world, for example through travel and friendship, along with the presence and relative status of other Koreans at the communication event, significantly influence language use. These results generally support the theories of the Contact Hypothesis (CH) and Willingness to Communicate (WTC). These disparate theories, together in the Korean context, suggest a need for greater focus on L2 friendship and L 1 status issues in language learning.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abelmann, N., & Lie, J. (1995). Blue dreams. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    • AII~ort, ~. W. (1954). The nature ofprejudice. Boston: The Beacon Press.
    • Amlchal-Hambur.ger, 'I. M., K.Y.A. (2006). The contact hypothesis reconsidered: Interacting via the internet. Joumal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(3), article 7. '
    • Amir, Y. (1969). Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychological Bulletin 71(5) 319-342. '
    • Amsdem, A. H. (1989). Asia's next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Arnold, J. (1999). Affect in language leaming. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Bae, D., & Han, J. (1994). The explication of the 6th English curriculum. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
    • Bailey, B. (2000). Communicative behavior and conflict between African-American customers and Korean immigrant retailers in Los Angeles. Discourse and Society, 11, 86-108.
    • Baker, S. C., & MaCintyre, P. D. (2000). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Leaming, 50(2), 311-341.
    • Bergentoft, R (1994). Foreign language instruction: A comparative perspective. Annals American Academy of Political and Social Science 532(March 1994),8-35.
    • Bergentoft, R, Hagen, S., & Ingram, D. E. (1994). Language planning around the world: Contexts and systemic change. Washington D.C.: National Foreign Language Center.
    • Boo, K. S., Lee, W. K., Lee, J. W., &Choi, Y. H. (2003). An investigation into the continuity of elementary and middle school English education through classroon observations and interviews. English Teaching, 58(2), 3-36.
    • Brown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Brown, R H., M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. anna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255-343). San Diego: Academic Press.
    • Brown, R J. (2000). Group Processes: Dynamics Within and Between Groups (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Butler, Y. G. (2003). Comparative perspectives towards communicative activities among elementary school teachers in South Korea, Japan and Taiwan. Language Teaching Research.
    • Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    • Byram, M., & Brumfit, C. (2001). The Routledge encyclopedia of/anguage teaching and leaming. London: Routledge.
    • Byram, M., & Fleming, M. (1998). Language leaming in intercultural perspective: Approaches through drama and ethnography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.
    • Caraway, W. M. (2000). Korea in the eye of the tiger. Retrieved June 23,2003, from http://www.koreanhistoryproject.org/ketlKETlndex.htm1999-2001
    • Celce-Murcia, M., Dornyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative compet.ence : ~ pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues m ApplIed Linguistics, 6(2), 5-35. .
    • Cha, J. G. (1998). Motivation in secondl foreign language learning and teaching: After Gardner. English Language Teaching, 9, 207-229. I •
    • Cheong, S. H., & Joo, H. M. (2005). Korean high school students perceptions abou~ socio-cultural interactions in English classrooms. English Language Teachmg, 17(1),1-22.
    • Chesebr~, J .. W., McCrosk~y, J. C., Atwater, D. F., & Bahrenfuss, R. M. (1992).
    • Communlcatlo~ apprehension and self-perceived communication competence of at-risk stude~ts.. C?"!munication Education, 41(4), 345.
    • Chew, P. G. L. (1999). Llguls.tlc Imperialism, globalism, and the English language. In D. Gradd?1 & U. H. Melnhof (Eds.), English in a chaging world (pp. 37-47). Oxford: Catchline/AILA.
    • Cho, D. (2004,>. Use of standardized tests as university graduation requirements. English Teaching, 59(1),251-266.
    • Choi, J. S. (2003). Early English learning and linguistic identity: Language attitude . research. Korea~ Journal ofApplied Linguistics, 19(2), 115-135.
    • ChOl, J. S. (2005). Changing attitudes to English and English speakers. English Language Teaching, 17(2), 1-24.
    • Choi, J. Y. (2003). Teacher thoughts behind instructional decision-making. English Teaching, 233-258(58), 3.
    • Clement, R. (1980). Ethnicity, contact and communicative competence in a second language. In H. Giles, W. P. Robinson & P. M. Smith (Eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 147-154). Oxford: Pergamon.
    • Clement, R. (1986). Second language proficiency and acculturation: An investigation of the effects of language status and individual characteristics. Language and Social Psychology, 5(4}, 271-290.
    • Clement, R., & Baker, S. C. (2001). Measuring social aspects of L2 acquisition and use:Scale characteristics and administration (No.1). Ottawa: University of Ottawa, School of psychology, Langauge reseach laboratory.
    • Clement, R., Dornyei, Z., & Noels, K. A (1994). Motivation, self-confidence, and group cohesion in the foreign language classroom. Language Leaming, 44(3),417- 448.
    • Clement, R., & Noels, K. A (1992). Towards a situated approach to ethnolinguistic identity: The effects of status on individuals and groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11(4),203-232.
    • Clement, R., Noels, K. A, & Deneault, B. (2001). Interethnic contact, identity, and psychological adjustment: The mediating and moderating roles of communication. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3}, 559-578.
    • Clyne, M. (1999). Intercultural discourse. In B. A Spolsky, R. E. (Ed.), Concise encyclopedia of educational linguistics. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
    • Coates, J. (1996). Women talk: Conversation between women friends. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    • Cook, S. W. (1985). Experimenting on social issues: The case of school desegregation. American Psychologist, 40(4}, 452-460.
    • Cooper, R. L. (1989). Language planning and social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1992). A template approach to text analysis: Developing and using codebooks. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 93-109). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
    • Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1999). Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
    • Crawford, M. (1995). Talking difference. London: Sage Publications.
    • Cummings, B. (1997). Korea's place in the sun: A modern history (1st ed.). New York: WW Norton & Company. . .
    • Davies, C. E. (2003). How English-learners joke with native speakers: An Interactional sociolinguistic perspective on humor as collaborative discourse across cultures. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1361-1385.
    • Davis, K. A (1995). Qualitative theory and methods in applied linguistics research. Tesol Quarterly, 29(3),427-453. .
    • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), !1a~dbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1-28). London: Sage Publications..
    • Desforges, D. M., Lord, C. G., Pugh, M. A, Sia, T. L., Scarberry, N. C. & Ratcliff, C. D. (1997). Role of group representativeness in the generalization part of the contact hypothesis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19(2), 183-204.
    • Deuchler,. M. (1992). The .confucian transformation of Korea: A study of society and . Ideology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    • Diamond, J. (1999). Guns, germs, and steel: The fate of human societies. New York: WW Norton & Company.
    • Dornyei, Z. (2000). Moti.vati.on in a.~tion : Towards a process-oriented conceptualisation . of student motlva.tlon. Bntlsh Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 519-538.
    • Dornyel, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation: Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
    • Dornyei, Z. (Ed.). (2~03). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances In theory, research, and applications. Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Dornyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction administration, and processing. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum As;ociates.
    • Dornyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah: Lawrence Eribaum Associates, Inc.
    • Dornyei, Z., & Csizer, K. (2002). Some dynamics of language attitudes and motivation: Results of a longitudinal nationwide survey. Applied Linguistics, 23(4),421-462.
    • Dornyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (2000). The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 275-300.
    • Duus, P. (1995). The abacus and the sword: The Japanese penetration of Korea, 1895- 1910. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    • Ellidokuzoglu, H. (2001). The role of innate language in first and second language acquisition. Retrieved May 26, 2001, from http://maxpages.com/thena
    • Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Evans, C. (1996). Ethnolinguistic vitality, prejudice, and family language transmission. The Bilingual Research Journal, 20(2), 177-207.
    • Finch, A. E. (2004). Promoting positive attitude change: Interactive learner journals. English Language Teaching, 16(4), 1-26.
    • Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., &Wong, L. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 107-132). London: Sage Publications.
    • Fortana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2000). The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincon (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 645-672). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
    • Freeman, R., & McElhinny, B. (1996). Language and gender. In S. L. Mckay & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 218-280). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., & Anastasio, P. A. (1996). The contact hypothesiS: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias among majority and minority group members. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? (pp. 230-360). Newbury Park: Sage Publications. . ..
    • Gardner, R. C. (1979). Social psychological aspects of second language acquIsition. In H. Giles & R. S. Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 193-220). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
    • Gardner, R. C. (1999). Correlation, causation, motivation, and second language acquisition. Canadian Psychology, 41(1), 10-24. . .
    • Gardner, R. C., & Macintyre, P. D. (1993). On the measurement of affective variables In second language learning. Language Learning, 43(2), 157-194.
    • Gardner, R. C., & Macintyre, P. D. (1993). A student's contribu~ions to second language learning: Part II: Affective variables. Language Teaching, 26, 1-11.
    • Gergen, M. M., & Gergen, K. J. (2000). Qualitative inquiry: Tensions and . . transformations. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1025-1046). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
    • Golden-Biddle, K., & Lock~, ~. D. (1997). Composing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.
    • Goldstein, T. (1995). Interviewing in a multicultural I multilingual setting. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3}, 587-593.
    • Goulde, J. (1999). Tracing the historical and cultural roots of Korean ethno-nationalism. Acta Koreana, 2,23-46.
    • Graddol, D., & Meinhof, U. H. (Eds.). (1999). English in a changing world (Vol. 13). Oxford: The English Book Centre.
    • Gudykunst, W. B. (1998). Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
    • Hamberger, J., & Hewstone, M. (1997). Inter-ethnic contact as a predictor of blatant and subtle prejudice: Tests of a model in four West European nations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36,173-190.
    • Hastings, M. (1987). The Korean war. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    • Hayes, E., & Flannery, D. D. (2000). Women as learners: The significance of gender in adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    • Hewstone, M. (2003). Intergroup contact: Panacea for prejudice? The Psychologist, 16, 352-355.
    • Hewstone, M. (2003). Intergroup contact: Panacea for prejudice? The Psychologist, 16, 352-355.
    • Hicks, G. (1995). The comfort women. Sydney: Allen & Unwin Pty.
    • Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94,319-340.
    • Higgins, E. T. (1996). The "self digest": Self-knowledge serving self-regulatory functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1062-1083.
    • Holliday, A (2002). Doing and writing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
    • Holmes, J. (2001). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Harlow: Pearson Education
    • Honna, N. (1995). English in Japanese society: Language within language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 16(1-2),45-62.
    • Hosoda, Y. (2000). Other-repair in Japanese conversations between nonnative and native speaker. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 39-63.
    • Hsu, F. L. K. (1983). Rugged individualism reconsidered: Essays in psychological anthropology. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
    • Inglehart, R. F., &Woodward, M. (1972). Language conflicts and political community. In P. P. Giglioli (Ed.), Language and social context (pp. 358-377). New York: Penguin.
    • Islam, M. R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability and out-group attitude:An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychological Bullitin, 19(6),700-710.
    • Jang, J. D. (2003). Levels of language anxiety relative to profiCiency levels. English Language Teaching, 15(4), 15-41. . ,
    • Jang, J. D. (2004). Sources of Korean EFL learners' language anxiety. EnglIsh Language Teaching, 16(3), 1-26.
    • Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes: Houghton Mifflin Company. . '
    • Jaworski, A. (1994). Pragmatic failure in a second language: Gre~tlng .res~o~ses In English by Polish students. International Journal of ApplIed LmgUlstlcs, 32(1), 41-55.
    • Jernudd, B. H., & Das Gupta, J. (1971). Towards a theory of language planning. In J. Rubin & B. H. Jernudd (Eds.), Can language be planned? (pp. 195-215). Honolulu: The University Press of Hawai'i. . '
    • Jernudd, B. H., & Shapiro, M. J. (1989). The politiCS of language punsm. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. . . '1'
    • Jin, K. A, & Park, C. (2004). The prediction of English item difficulty In scholastiC abllty test. English Teaching, 59(1}, 267-278. . ..
    • Jin, K. A, & Park, C. (2005). Factors related to difficulty of college scholastiC ability test English items. English Teaching, 60(3}, 17-26.
    • Johnstone, B. (2002). Discourse analysis. London: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
    • Jung, S. K., &. Norton, B. (2002). Language planning in Korea: The new elementary ~nghsh program. In J. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical Issues (pp. 245-265). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Jung, W. H., & Ka~g, E. M.. (~005). The effect of years of English study and an extracurncular activity on learning strategy use. English Language Teaching 17(2), 25-48. '
    • Kang, A. J. (2004~. Explori~g the possibilities of nonnative English teacher in ElL perspective. EnglJsh Teaching, 59(1),207-234.
    • Kang, D. H. (1999). Motivation and its change in EFL contexts (Foreign language learning motivation).
    • Kang, S. J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicatie in a second language. System, 33(2),277-292.
    • Keeves, J. P. (1994). Longitudinal research methods. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 6, pp. 3512- 3524). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    • Kent, D. B. (1999). Speaking in tongues: Chinglish, Japlish and Konglish. Paper presented at the KOTESOL Proceedings of the Second Pan Asian Conference, Seoul.
    • Kim, C. H. (1998). An agenda for change in English education in Korea. English Language Teaching, 9(1), 189-206.
    • Kim, C. S. (1996). The culture of Korean industry: An ethnography of Poongsan corporation. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.
    • Kim, E. J., & Jeon, J. H. (2005). A comparitive study of the national English curricula of Korea, China and Japan: Educational policies and practices in the teaching of English. English Teaching, 60(3), 27-48.
    • Kim, H. K. (Ed.). (1980). Studies on Korea: A scholars guide. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawai'i.
    • Kim, H. O. (2002). Age differences in motivation. English Teaching, 57(4), 101-129.
    • Kim, H. S. (2004). A sociological analysis of the 2002 digital formation of South Korea. Acta Koreana, 7(2), 121-146.
    • Kim, K. J. (2004). The relationship between motivation and intercultural sensitivity in English achievement. English Teaching, 59(4),97-120.
    • Kim, S. A. (2002). A critical reflection on the 'Teaching English through English' classes in the Korean context. English Teaching, 57(4),315-346.
    • Kim, S. H. (1997). Korean culture and communication. 11,209-236.
    • Kim, S. Y. (2002). Teachers' perceptions about teaching English through English. English Teaching, 57(1), 131-148.
    • Kim, S. Y., & Kim, J. H. (2004). When the learner becomes a teacher: Foreign language anxiety as an occupational hazard. English Teaching, 59(1), 165-186.
    • Kim, T. C., & Kennedy, T. J. (2004). Insights into Korean students' sense of self-identity regarding the study of English in Korea. English Teaching, 59(1), 187-206.
    • Kim, Y. (2004). A factor analytic study of English language anxiety: The case of Korean University EFL learners. English Teaching, 59(4),239-256.
    • Kim, Y. (2004). Korean university EFL students' perceived barriers to classroom participation. English Language Teaching, 16(4),55-80. . .
    • Kramsch, C. (1993). Contex and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Kramsch, C. (Ed.). (1998). Language and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Kramsch, C. (1998). Language learning in intercultural perspective: Approa?~es through drama and ethnography. In M. Byram & M. Fleming (Eds.), The pnvi/ege of the intercultural speaker (pp. 16-31). Cambridge: Cambridge Uni~~r~ity Press.
    • Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practices in second language acqUIsitIOn. Oxford: Pergamon. .
    • Kwon, O. (2000). Korea's English edcucation policy changes in the 1990s: Innovations to gear the nation for the 21st century. English Teaching, 55(1),47-92..
    • Kwon, O. (2005). The effect of elementary school English education on Korean high school students' English abilities. English Teaching, 60(3),49-66.
    • Kwon, 0., Yoshi~a, K., Watanabe, Y., Negosho, M., & Naganuma, N. (2004). A companson of English proficiency of Korean, Japanese and Chinese high school students. English Teaching, 59(4),3-22.
    • Kwon, S. C. (~001). Korean and American communication patterns of self expression. English Language Teaching, 13(2),45-65.
    • Kym, I. (2004). En~lish prefer~nce tendencies and English learning anxiety in primary . school children. English Teaching, 59(3),215-246.
    • Labne, N., & Clement, R (1986). Ethnolinguistic vitality, self-confidence and second language proficiency: An investigation. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 7(4),269-282.
    • Lambert, R D. (Ed.). (1994). Language planning around the world: Contexts and systematic change. Washington D.C.: National Foreign Language Center.
    • Lee, J. K. (2001). Confucian thought affecting leadership and organizational culture of Korean higher. Radical Pedagogy, 3(3).
    • Lee, K. (2003). Sociocultural factors influencing Asian students' reticence in the ESL classroom. English Language Teaching, 15(4),97-111.
    • Lee, M. B. (2003). Are language learning strategies gender-specific? Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 137-149.
    • Lee, S. (2003). An analYSis of primary school ESL teacher's talk. English Teaching, 58(1),219-238.
    • Lee, S. (2005). Comparison of teacher talks from three different primary school ESL teachers. English Teaching, 60(2), 161-184.
    • Lightbrown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned (Oxford handbooks for language teachers) (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Lim, H. Y. (2002). The interaction of motivation, perception, and environment: One EFL learner's experience. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Liguistics, 7(2),91-106.
    • Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20(1),71-94.
    • Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. V. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26(1),27-56.
    • Lovmo, M. S. (2002). Language purism in Korea. Retrieved June 20,2002, from http://www.fortunecity.com/victorian/exhibition/605/page31.html
    • Lucas, R E., Diener, E., Grob, A, Suh, E. M., & Shao, L. (2000). Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3),452-468.
    • Macintyre, P. D. (2003, June 1). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Proximal and distal influences. Paper presented at the 33rd annual conference of the Canadian Association of Applied Linguistics, Halifax, NS, Canada.
    • Macintyre, P. D., Babin, P. A, & Clement, R (1999). Willingness to communicate: Antecedents & consequences. Communication Quarterly, 47(2),215-229.
    • Macintyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clement, R, & Donovan, L. A (2002). Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning, 52(3), 537-564.
    • Macintyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clement, R & Condrod, S. (2001). Willingness to communicate, social support, and language-learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 369-338.
    • Macintyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clement, R, and Donovan, L. A (2003). Talking in order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4),589-607.
    • Macintyre, P. D., & Clement, R (1996, August 1996). A model of willingness to communicate in a second language: The concept, its antecedents and implications. Paper presented at the World Congress of Applied Linguistics (AILA), Jyvaskyla, Finland. . .
    • Macintyre, P. D., Clement, R, Doernyei, l., & Noels, K. A (1998). ConceptualiZing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82(4),545-562.
    • Maehr, M. L., & Pintrich, P. R (1995). Advances in motivation and achievement: Culture, motivation and achievement (Vol. 9). London: JAI Press.
    • Malinowski, B. (1994). Supple~ent 1: The problem of meaning in primitive language. In C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richard (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 435-496). London: Routledge.
    • Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954-969.
    • Martsuoka, R, & Evans, D. R. (2005). Willingness to communicate in the second language. J Nurs Studies NCNJ, 4(1), 3-12.
    • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370-396.
    • McCarthy, M. J., & Carter, R A. (1994). Language as discourse: Perspectives for language teaching. Harlow: Longman.
    • McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview (Vol. 13). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
    • McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40(1), 16-25.
    • McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1987). Willingness to communicate. In J. C. McCroskey & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 129-156). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
    • Meechan, M. (2000). Language in social contexts. In W. O'grady & J. Archibald (Eds.), Contemporary linguistic analysis: An introduction (pp. 494-539). Toronto: Pearson Education Canada Inc.
    • Menard, S. (1991). Longitudinal research. Colorado: Sage Publications.
    • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
    • Mitchell, R., & Lee, J. (2003). Sameness and difference in classroom learning cultures: Interpretations of communicative pedagogy in the UK and Korea. Language Teaching Research, 7(1),35-63.
    • Morgan, C. (1998). Cross-cultural encounters. In M. Byram & M. Fleming (Eds.), Language learning in intercultural perspective: Approaches through drama and ethnography (pp. 224-241). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Morgan, C. (1999). Culture. In B. Spolsky & R E. Asher (Eds.), Concise encyclopedia of educationalliguistics (pp. 5000 word entry). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    • Na, E. Y., & Min, K. H. (2000). Discrepancies between formal/explicit and informal/implicit norms in Korea and generation gaps theoretical points and evidence from existing survey data. Korean Social Science Journal, 27(1), 113- 142.
    • Nam, J. Y., & Southard, B. (1994). Orthographic representation and resyllabification of English loan words in Korean. Language and Speech, 37(3), 259-281.
    • Noels, K. A., & Clement, R (1996). Communicating across cultures: Social determinants and acculturative consequences. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 28(3), 214-228.
    • Noels, K. A., Pon, G., & Clement, R. (1996). Language, identity and adjustment: The role of linguistic self-confidence in the acculturation process. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(3), 246-264. .
    • Nunan, D. C. (1989). Designing tasks for the communication classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Nunan, D. C. (1999, 2000). President's message: Yes, but is it English? Tesol Matters, 9(6). .
    • O'Grady, W., & Archibold, J. (2000). Contemporary linguistic analysiS. Toronto: Addison Wesley Longman. . . . .
    • Oh, J. (2004). A mismatch between testing and reading crncular objectives for high school. English Language Teaching, 16(4),113-132. .
    • Oh, M. (2005). Six Korean college students' practice of autonomous language learning. English Teaching, 60(2), 59-86. . . .
    • O'Neil, W. (1997). If Ebonics isn't a language, then tell me what IS? Rethmkmg Schools:The Real Ebonics Debate, 12(1), 10-11.
    • Oxford, R. L. (1999). Anxiety and the language learner: New insights. In J. ~rnol~ (Ed.), Affect in language learning (pp. 58-67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Pae, T. I. (2005). Construct validation of the English subtest of the Korean college scholastic facility test. English Language Teaching, 17(1),45-58.
    • Pak, Y. (2005). ~ study of university students' perceptions on TETE. English Language Teaching, 17(1),59-82.
    • Palmer, R. (2005). A. study of university conversation instruction and reconstruction .. tasks. EnglIsh Language Teaching, 17(3),57-82.
    • Paollm, S., Hewstone, M:, Voci.' A., Harwood, J., &Cairns, E. (2004). Intergroup contact and the promotion of Intergroup harmony: The influence of intergroup emotions. In R. J. Brown & D. Capozza (Eds.), Social identities: Motivational, emotional cultural influences. Hove: Psychology Press. '
    • Park, M. R., & Suh, K. O. (2003). An analYSis of Korean high school English textbooks under the 7th curriculum. English Teaching, 58(4), 319-348.
    • Park, N. S. (1989). Lang.u.age purism in Korea today. In B. H. Jernudd & M. J. Shapiro (Eds.), The POlitICS oflanguage purism (pp. 113-139). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    • Park, S. Y., & Sung, K. (2003). A study on the possibility of problematizing social ~~~~tices in an EFL college classroom. English Language Teaching, 15(3), 83-
    • Peirce, B. N. (1995). The theory methodology in qualitative research. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 569-576.
    • Pennycook, A. (1999). Introduction: Critical approaches to TESOL. TESOL quarterly, 33(3), 329-348.
    • Pettigrew, T. F. (1996). Generalized effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology, 23(2),173-185.
    • Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Reviews Psychology, 49,65- 85.
    • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2004). A meta-analytic test and reformulation of intergroup contact theory, from http://www.cbrss.harvard.edu/events/ppbw/papers/tropp.pdf
    • Pettigrew, T. F. Tropp., L.R. (2004). A meta-analytical test and reformulation of intergroup contact theory. Retrieved August, 2006, from http://www.cbrss.harvard.edu/events/ppbw/papers/tropp.pdf
    • Phillipson, R. (2001). English for globalisation or for the world's people? International Review of Education, 47(3-4), 185-200.
    • Phillipson, R., & Skutnabb-Kangas, T. Englishisation: One dimension of globalisation. In D. Graddol & U. H. Meinhof (Eds.), English in a changingworld. AILA Review 13 (pp. 19-36). Oxford: The English Book Centre.
    • Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates laguage. New York: W. Morrow & Co.
    • Pool, I. d. S. (1966). Effects of cross-national contact on national and international images. In H. C. Kelman (Ed.), International behavior: A social-psychological analysiS (pp. 104-129). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
    • Portes, P. R. (1996). Ethnicity and culture in educational psychology. In D. C. Berliner &
    • R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 331- 357). New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan.
    • Publicaitons manual of the American psychological association. (4th ed.)(1994). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association. . . . .
    • Pyo, K. H. (2005). Students' perceptions on homework assignment practice In umverslty English conversation classes. English Language Teaching, !7(2), ~1-104..
    • Raine, A., Reynolds, C., Venables, P. H., & Mednick, S. A. (2002). Stimulation ~eeklng and intelligence: A prospective longitudinal study. Journal of PersonalIty and Social Psychology, 82(4),663-674. .
    • Rhie, W. B. (2002). Korea unmasked: In search of the country, the socIety and the people. Seoul: Gimm-Young Publishers, Inc.
    • Roberts, C., Byram, M., Barro, A., Jordan, S., & Street, B. (Eds.). (2001). Language learners as ethnographers. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
    • Robinson, M. E. (1988). Cultural nationalism in colonial Korea, 1920-1925. Seattle: University of Washington Press. .
    • Robinson, P. (2002). Individual differences and instructed language learning (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. .
    • Rosenberg, M., & Turner, R. H. (1981). Social psychology. New York: BaSIC Books.
    • Ross, R..(2004). Cult~ral awar~ness in EFL instruction: Rationale and suggestions for . Implementation. English Language Teaching, 16(4),161-179.
    • Rubin, J., & Jernu~d, B. H. (1971~. Can ~anguage be planned?: Sociolinguistic theory and practice for developmg nations. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawai'i.
    • Ryan, G. W., ~ Bernard, ~. R (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 769-802). London: Sage publications.
    • Ryoo, H. K. (2004). Critical review of the stUdies of miscommunication between native and nonnative speakers. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 107-135.
    • Ryu, Y. S. (2005). Teacher talk in EFL university classroom. English Teaching 60(1) 41-68. ' ,
    • Sarangi, S. (Ed.). (1995). Culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publ. Co.
    • Savada, A. M., & Shaw, W. (Eds.). (1992). South Korea: A country study. Washington D.C.: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress.
    • Saville-Troike, M. (1989). The ethnography of communication: An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    • Saville-Troike, M. (1996). The ethnography of communication. In S. L. McKAY & N. H.
    • Hornberger (Eds.), SOCiOlinguistics and language teaching (pp. 351-382). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Schiffrin, D. (1996). International sociolinguistics. In S. L. McKAY & N. H.
    • Hornberger (Eds.), SOCiOlinguistics and language teaching (pp. 307-328). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Schumann, J. H. (1997). The neurobiology of affect in language. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
    • Schumann, J. H., Crowell, S. E., Jones, N. E., Lee, N., Schuchert, S. A., & Wood, L. A. (2004). The neurobiology of learning: Perspectives from second language acquisition. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Scollon, R, & Scollon, S. W. (1995). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Oxford: Blackwell publishers Inc.
    • Scott, W. A. (1966). Psychological and social correlates of international images. In H. C. Kelman (Ed.), International Behavior: A social-psychological analysis (pp. 71- 103). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
    • Seth, M. (2000). Examination mania: South Korea's entrance examination system. Acta Koreana, 3, 35-55.
    • Shin, J. (2003). Politeness and discourse strategies by Korean women in non-traditional authority pOSitions. Acta Koreana, 6(2),25-54.
    • Silverman, D. (2000). Analyzing talk and text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 821-834). London: Sage Publications Inc.
    • Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: SAGE Publications.
    • Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2001). The globalisation of (educational) language rights. International Review of Education, 47(3-4),201-219.
    • Spaeth, A., & Macintyre, D. (2005, November 14). Breaking through. Time Asia Magazine, 16.
    • Sperling, D. (2005). Dave's ESL cafe. Retrieved June 21, 2005, from www.eslcafe.com
    • Spolsky, B. (1998). SociOlinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Pres~. . ..
    • Spolsky, B., & Asher, R E. (1999). Concise encyclopedia of educatlonallmgUlstlcs. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    • Sridhar, K. K. (1996). Social multilingualism. In S. L. McKAY & N. H. Hornberg~r (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 47-70). New York: Cambndge University Press.
    • Stangor, C., Jonas, K., Stroebe, W., & Hewstone, M. (1996). Influence of stud~nt.. exchange on national stereotypes, attitudes and perceived group vanability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 663-675. .
    • Stephan, W. G. (1987). The contact hypothesis in intergroup relations. In C. H.erdnck (Ed.), Group processes and intergroup relations: Review ofpersonality and social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 13-40). Beverly Hills: Sage.
    • Students flee Korea to avoid life-defining exam. (2005, November 24, 2005). Korea Herald, p. 3.
    • Tajfel, H., & Fraser, C. (Eds.). (1978). Introducing social psychology. London: Penguin Books.
    • Thorne, S. (2001). DOing qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(1),136- 137.
    • Trudgill, P. (2000). Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society (4th ed.). London: Penguin.
    • Tzeng, O. C. S., & Jackson, J. W. (1994). Effects of contact, conflict, and social identity on interethnic group hostilities. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18(2), 259-276.
    • Wells, K. M. (Ed.). (1995). South Korea's Minjung movement: The culture and politics of dissidence. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
    • Wen, W. P., & Clement, R. (2003). A Chinese conceptualisation of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16(1), 18-38.
    • Whorf, B. L. (1956). Science and liguistics. Language Thought and Reality, 42(6), 229- 231, 247-248.
    • Wiley, T. G. (1996). Language planning and policy. In S. L. McKAY & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 103-147). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • Woo, K. J. (2001). A qualitative study of feelings of inadequacy among Korean elementary school teachers of English. English Language Teaching, 13(2), 117-144.
    • Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1),54-66.
    • Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54(1), 119-152.
    • Yoneyama, S. (1999). The Japanese high school: Silence and resistance. London: Routledge.
    • Yoon, K. E.CLT theories and practices in EFL curricula: A case of Korea. Asian EFL Journal,6.
    • Young, D. J. (1999). Affect in foreign language and second language learning: A practical guide to creating a low-anxiety classroom atmosphere. Boston: McGraw Hill.
    • Yu, K. A. (2003). An alternative analysis of Korean addresses honorific system. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(1).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article