LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Chater, Nick; Loewenstein, George (2015)
Publisher: Elsevier BV * North-Holland
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: BF, HB
This paper draws attention to a powerful human motive that has not yet been incorporated into economics: the desire to make sense of our immediate experience, our life, and our world. We propose that evolution has produced a ‘drive for sense-making’ which motivates people to gather, attend to, and process information in a fashion that augments, and complements, autonomous sense-making. A large fraction of autonomous cognitive processes are devoted to making sense of the information we acquire: and they do this by seeking simple descriptions of the world. In some situations, however, autonomous information processing alone is inadequate to transform disparate information into simple representations, in which case, we argue, the drive for sense-making directs our attention and can lead us to seek out additional information. We propose a theoretical model of sense-making and of how it is traded off against other goals. We show that the drive for sense-making can help to make sense of a wide range of disparate phenomena, including curiosity, boredom, ‘flow’, confirmation bias and information avoidance, esthetics (both in art and in science), why we care about others’ beliefs, the importance of narrative and the role of ‘the good life’ in human decision making.\ud
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Atherton, J., 1999. Resistance to learning: a discussion based on participants in in-service professional training programmes. J. Vocation. Educ. Train. 51 (1), 77-90.
    • Bate, W.J., 2009. John Keats. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
    • Baumeister, R.F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., Vohs, K.D., 2001. Bad is stronger than good. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 5 (4), 323-370.
    • Berridge, K.C., 1996. Food reward: brain substrates of wanting and liking. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 20 (1), 1-25.
    • Blakemore, C., 1993. Vision: Coding and Efficiency. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    • Boorstin, D.J., 1962. The Image, or, What Happened to the American Dream. Vintage.
    • Boulding, K., 1956. The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society. University of Michigan Press.
    • Bruner, J., 2004. Life as narrative. Soc. Res. 71 (3), 691-710.
    • Chaitin, G.J., 1995. The Berry paradox. Complexity 1 (1), 26-30.
    • Chater, N., 1996. Reconciling simplicity and likelihood principles in perceptual organization. Psychol. Rev. 103 (3), 566.
    • Chater, N., 1999. The search for simplicity: a fundamental cognitive principle? Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 52 (A), 273-302.
    • Chater, N., 2005. A minimum description length principle for perception. In: Pitt, M., Myung, I. (Eds.), Advances in Minimum Description Length: Theory and Applications. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
    • Chater, N., Vitányi, P., 2003. The generalized universal law of generalization. J. Math. Psychol. 47, 346-369.
    • Chater, N., Vitányi, P., 2007. 'Ideal learning' of natural language: positive results about learning from positive evidence. J. Math. Psychol. 51, 135-163.
    • Clark, H.H., 1996. Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    • Cover, T.M., Thomas, J.A., 1991. Elements of Information Theory. John Wiley & Sons.
    • Csikszentmihalyi, M., 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper and Row, New York.
    • Dayan, P., Abbott, L.F., 2001. Theoretical Neuroscience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
    • Evers, E.R.K., Inbar, Y., Loewenstein, G., Zeelenberg, M., 2014a. Order Preference, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2466991.
    • Evers, E.R.K., Inbar, Y., Zeelenberg, M., 2014b. Set-fit effects in choice. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 143 (2), 504-509.
    • Fodor, J.A., 1983. Modularity of Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
    • Fukushima, K., 2001. Recognition of partly occluded patterns: a neural network model. Biol. Cybern. 84 (4), 251-259.
    • Gleick, J., 2011. The Information: A History, a Theory and a Flood. HarperCollins.
    • Glushko, R.J., 2013. The Discipline of Organizing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
    • Glynn, I., 2010. Elegance in Science: The Beauty of Simplicity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    • Goertzel, T., 1994. Belief in conspiracy theories. Polit. Psychol. 15, 731-742.
    • Golman, R., Haggman, D., Loewenstein, G., Working Paper 2015. Information Avoidance. Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University.
    • Gregory, A., 2015, February 9. R U There?: A New Counselling Service Harnesses the Power of the Text Message.
    • Hardy, G.H., 1940. A Mathematician's Apology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    • Hochberg, J., McAlister, E., 1953. A quantitative approach to figure “goodness”. J. Exp. Psychol. 46, 361-364.
    • Hoffman, D.D., Richards, W.A., 1984. Parts of recognition. Cognition 18 (1), 65-96.
    • Hsee, C.K., Ruan, B., Working Paper 2014. Increasing Happiness by First Inducing and Then Resolving a Desire: The Case of Curiosity. The University of Chicago.
    • Idesawa, M., 1991. Perception of 3-D illusory surface with binocular viewing. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 30 (4B), L751.
    • Juslin, P., Fiedler, K., Chater, N., 2006. Less is more in covariation detection-or is it. In: Fiedler, K., Juslin, P. (Eds.), Information Sampling and Adaptive Cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 92-123.
    • Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 (2), 263-291.
    • Kanizsa, G., 1979. Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception. Praeger Publishers.
    • Karlsson, N., Loewenstein, G., McCafferty, J., 2004. The economics of meaning. Nordic J. Polit. Econ. 30 (1), 61-75.
    • Karlsson, N., Loewenstein, F., Seppi, D., 2009. The ostrich effect: selective avoidance of information. J. Risk Uncertainty 38 (2), 95-115.
    • Kay, A.C., Moscovitch, D.A., Laurin, K., 2010. Randomness, attributions of arousal, and belief in God. Psychol. Sci. 21 (2), 216-218.
    • Kemeny, J.G., 1953. The use of simplicity in induction. Philos. Rev. 62, 391-408.
    • Koffka, K., 2013/1935. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. Routledge.
    • K o˝szegi, B., 2003. Health anxiety and patient behavior. J. Health Econ. 22 (6), 1073-1084.
    • K o˝szegi, B., 2010. Utility from anticipation and personal equilibrium. Econ. Theory 44 (3), 415-444.
    • K o˝szegi, B., Rabin, M., 2006. A model of reference-dependent preferences. Q. J. Econ. 121 (4), 1133-1165.
    • Kruger, J., Evans, M., 2009. The paradox of Alypius and the pursuit of unwanted information. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45 (6), 1173-1179.
    • Kuhn, T.S., 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1st ed. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    • Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J.W., Myers, J., 2013. An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behav. Brain Sci. 36 (06), 661-679.
    • Levinson, S., 2000. Presumptive Meanings. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
    • Li, M., Vitányi, P.M., 2009. An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications. Springer Science & Business Media.
    • Loewenstein, G., 1994. The psychology of curiosity: a review and reinterpretation. Psychol. Bull. 116 (1), 75-98.
    • Moore, R., 2002. Reconstructing reality: conspiracy theories about Jonestown. J. Popular Cult. 36 (2), 200-220.
    • Nickerson, R.S., 1998. Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2 (2), 175-220.
    • Oster, E., Shoulson, I., Dorsey, E.R., 2013. Optimal expectations and limited medical testing: evidence from Huntington disease. Am. Econ. Rev. 103 (2), 804-830.
    • Park, C.L., 2005. Religion as a meaning-making framework in coping with life stress. J. Soc. Issues 61 (4), 707-729.
    • Pennebaker, J.W., Seagal, J.D., 1999. Forming a story: the health benefits of narrative. J. Clin. Psychol. 55 (10), 1243-1254.
    • Pennington, N., Hastie, R., 1991. Cognitive theory of juror decision making: the story model, A. Cardozo Law Rev. 13, 519-557.
    • Pennington, N., Hastie, R., 1992. Explaining the evidence: tests of the story model for juror decision making. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 62 (2), 189-206.
    • Piaget, J., 1954. The Construction of Reality in the Child. Basic Books, New York.
    • Pomerantz, J.R., Kubovy, M., 1986. Theoretical approaches to perceptual organization: simplicity and likelihood principles. In: Boff, K.R., Kaufman, L., Thomas, J.E. (Eds.), Handbook of Perception and Human Performance: Vol. H. Cognitive Processes and Performance, 36. Wiley, New York, pp. 1-45.
    • Pylyshyn, Z., 1999. Is vision continuous with cognition?: the case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. Behav. Brain Sci. 22 (03), 341-365.
    • Rissanen, J., 1987. Stochastic complexity. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 49, 223-239.
    • Rock, I., Palmer, S., 1990. Gestalt psychology. Sci. Am. 263, 84-90.
    • Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L., 1986. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, 2 vols. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
    • Scheffler, I., 1972. Vision and revolution: a postscript on Kuhn. Philos. Sci. 39, 366-374.
    • Schelling, T.C., 1987. The mind as a consuming organ. In: Elster, J. (Ed.), The Multiple Self. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, pp. 177-195.
    • Schmidhuber, J., 2009. Simple algorithmic theory of subjective beauty, novelty, surprise, interestingness, attention, curiosity, creativity, art, science, music, jokes. J. Soc. Instrum. Control Eng. 48 (1), 21-32.
    • Stevenson, A. (Ed.), 2010. Oxford Dictionary of English. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
    • Stigler, G.J., Becker, G.S., 1977. De gustibus non est disputandum. Am. Econ. Rev. 67, 76-90.
    • Sunstein, C.R., 2015. How star wars illuminates constitutional law. Mich. Law Rev. (forthcoming).
    • Sunstein, C.R., Vermeule, A., 2009. Conspiracy theories: causes and cures. J. Polit. Philos. 17 (2), 202-227.
    • Taylor, C., 2014. How Star Wars Conquered the Universe. Head of Zeus, London.
    • Wallace, C.S., Freeman, P.R., 1987. Estimation and inference by compact coding. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 49, 240-251.
    • Wilkinson, A., 2015. The pursuit of beauty: Yitang Zhang solves a pure-math mystery. New Yorker February 2.
    • Wright, E., 1992. Gestalt switching: Hanson, Aronson, and Harré. Philos. Sci. 59, 480-486.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article