Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Cook, R.; Shah, P.; Gaule, A.; Bird, G.
Publisher: ELSEVIER
Journal: Current Biology
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all), BF, Correspondence

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: genetic structures
Summary Newborn infants exhibit a remarkable tendency to orient to faces. This behavior is thought to be mediated by a subcortical mechanism tuned to the protoface stimulus: a face-like configuration comprising three dark areas on a lighter background. When this unique stimulus translates across their visual field, neurotypical infants will change their gaze or head direction to track the protoface [1–3]. Orienting to this low spatial frequency pattern is thought to encourage infants to attend to faces, despite their poor visual acuity [2,3]. By biasing the input into the newborn’s visual system, this primitive instinct may serve to ‘canalize’ the development of more sophisticated face representation. Leading accounts attribute deficits of face perception associated with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) [4] to abnormalities within this orienting mechanism. If infants who are later diagnosed with ASD exhibit reduced protoface orienting, this may compromise the emergence of perceptual expertise for faces [5]. Here we report a novel effect that confirms that the protoface stimulus captures adults’ attention via an involuntary, exogenous process (Experiment 1). Contrary to leading developmental accounts of face perception deficits in ASD, we go on to show that this orienting response is intact in autistic individuals (Experiment 2).
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Farroni, T., Johnson, M.H., Menon, E., Zulian, L., Faraguna, D., and Csibra, G. (2005).
    • Acad. Sci. USA. 102, 17245-17250.
    • Johnson, M.H. (2005). Subcortical face processing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 766-774.
    • Morton, J., and Johnson, M.H. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLERN: a two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychol. Rev. 98, 164-181.
    • Dawson, G., Webb, S.J. and McPartland, J. (2005). Understanding the nature of face processing impairment in autism: insights from behavioral and electrophysiological studies. Dev. Neuropsychol. 27, 403-424.
    • Schultz, R.T. (2005). Developmental deficits in social perception in autism: the role of the amygdala and fusiform face area. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 23, 125-141.
    • Stein, T., Peelen, M.V., and Sterzer, P. (2011). Adults' awareness of faces follows newborns' looking preferences. PLoS One 6, e29361.
    • Tomalski, P., Csibra, G., and Johnson, M.H. (2009). Rapid orienting toward face-like stimuli with gaze-relevant contrast information. Perception 38, 569-578.
    • Brainard, D.H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10, 433-436.
  • Inferred research data

    The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    Title Trust
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

Cite this article