Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:

OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]openaire.eu

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Parsons, Allan J.
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
It is argued that advertisements constitute a semiotic social resource. A communicative practice is realised using this resource which is part of the commercial function of advertising. However, this communicative practice is shown to be a limited meaning production.\ud \ud Advertising is theorised as a discursive social practice in which a communicative practice has become dominant. The discursive practice works ideologically, not simply communicatively or commercially.\ud \ud The ideological operation is understood as the address of social subjects in local historical situations. Advertisements present a unified position from which the text can be understood as communicative. That position is imbricated with representations constituted by the text, as the other of the ego.\ud \ud The ego is imbricated with an order of discourse, which is a field of unevenly developed discursive practices. Through the overdetermination of the text in discursive social practice, the imbrications are hierarchised to construct representations of the 'real'. The 'real' is socially constituted. It is not a simple ontological priority.\ud \ud The institutional intentionality of marketing practice authorises the communicative practice. Thus, the authorised practice is enacted and resisted, or deconstructed, through a series of readings of advertisements from British magazines between 1956 and 1964. That period is considered to be one in which advertising was consolidated, both in corporate strategies and technologically in the public media. The deconstructive reading reinstates the discursive productions\ud marginalised by the communicative practice.\ud \ud Advertisements are not simply reciprocal conversations freely developed between ego and other. Advertising as discourse is developed in the context of economic corporations' strategies.\ud \ud Advertisements encode, reiterate and constitute social subjects, through overdetermination, in relations of power. Ideologically, when formed as a communicative practice,\ud advertisements join social subjects with an hegemonised order of power relations, which are realised in an extended social order in whose 'real' economic institutions are dominant.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • CONNERTON, P. ed. Critical sociology: selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1976.
    • CONNOLLY, W.E. Taylor, Foucault, and otherness. Political Theory, 13(3) 1985, pp. 365-176.
    • COOK, C. and SKED, A. Post-war Britain: a political history. Harmondsworth: penguin, 1979.
    • CORRIGAN, P. and WILLIS, P. Cultural forms and class mediations. Media, Cultural and Society, 2 1980, p. 297-312.
    • CORRIGAN, P. Dichotomy is contradiction: on 'society' as constraint and construction. Remarks on the doctrine of the 'two sociologies'. Sociological Review, 23 1975, p. 211-243.
    • CORRIGAN, P. Into textuality: timing our words. The Sociological Review, vol. 31 1983, p.759-768.
    • COWARD, R. Class, 'culture' and the social formation. Screen, vol. 18(1) Spring 1977, p. 75-105.
    • COWARD, R. Female desire. London: Paladin Books, 1984.
    • COWARD, R. and ELLIS, J. Language and materialism. London: Routledge, 1977.
    • CROSLAND, C. A. R. The mass media. Encounter, no. 110 Nov. 1962, p. 3-14.
    • CULLER, J. On deconstruction. London: Routledge, 1983.
    • CULLER, J. Saussure. Glasgow: Fontana/Collins 1976.
    • CULLER, J. Structuralist poetics: structuration linguistics and the study of literature. London: Routledge, 1975.
    • CURRAN, J. The impact of advertising on. the British mass media. Media, Culture and Soclety, 3(1) 1981, p. 43-69.
    • CURRAN, J. et ale eds. society. London: F re s s, 1977.
    • DAVIS, H. and WALTON, P. eds. Language, image, media. Oxford: Blackwell, 1983.
    • DAWE, A. The Two sociologies. British Journal of Sociology, 21 1970, p. 207-218.
    • DELEUZE, G. and GUATTARI, F. Anti-Oedipus: capitalism and sChizophrenia. London: Athlone, 1984.
    • DELEU2E, G. and GUATTARI, F. Rhizome. I & C no. 8 Spring 1981, p. 49-72.
    • DERRIDA, J. The archaeology of the frivolous: reading Condillac. Pittsburgh, Penn.: Duquesne U. P., 1980.
    • DERRIDA, J. Choreographies [interview with C.V. McDonald]. Diacritics, 12 1982, pp.66-76.
    • DERRIDA, J. The purveyor of truth. Studies, no. 52 1975, pp. 31-113.
    • DERRIDA, J. Racism's last word. 12 Autumn 1985, p. 290-299.
    • DERRIDA, J. Restitutions of truth to size. Research in Phenomenology, vol. 8 1978, pp.1-44.
    • DERRIDA, J. Signsponge. New York: Columbia U.P., 1984.
    • DERRIDA, J. Speculations - on Freud. Oxford Literary Review, vol. 3 no. 2 1978, p. 78-97.
    • DERRIDA, J. Speech and phenomena. Evanston, Ill: North Western U.P., 1973. Spurs: Nietzsche's styles. Chicago U. of Chicago Press, 1979.
    • DERRIDA, J. Writing and difference. London: Routledge, 1978.
    • DESCOMBES, v. Modern French philosophy - Cambridge: Cambridge U.P., 1980.
    • DIJK, T. A. van. Text and context: explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London: Longman, 1977.
    • DONALD, J. Media studies: limitations. London: 1977.
    • DREYFUS, H. L. and RABINOW, P. Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Brightor.: Harvester Press Ltd., 1982.
    • DYER, G. Advertising as communication. London: Methuen, 1982.
    • FONTAINE, J.S. La. Sex and age as principles of social differentiation. New York; London: Academic Press, 1978.
    • FORRESTER, J. Who is in analysis with whom? Freud, Lacan, Derrida. Economy and Society, May 1984, p. 153-177.
    • FOUCAULT, M. The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock Publications, 1972.
    • FOUCAULT, M. The birth of the clinic: an archaeology of medical perception. London: Tavistock Publications, 1976.
    • FOUCAULT, M. Discipline and punish: of the prison. Harmondsworth: 1979.
    • FOUCAULT, M. Power, truth, strategy. Sydney: Feral Publications, 1979.
    • FOUCAULT, M. Questions of method: an intervie~. I & C No.8, Spring 1981, p. 3-14.
    • FOX-GENOVESE, E. Placing women's history in history. New Left Review, no. 133, 1982, p. 5-29.
    • FREUD, S. The interpretation of dreams. Harrnondsworth: penguin, 1976.
    • FREUD, S. Jokes and their relation to the unconSClOUS. Hardmondsworth: Penguin, 1976.
    • FREUD, S. On sexuality. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977.
    • FREUD, S. The psychopathology of everyday life. Hardmondsworth: Penguin, 1975.
    • FROW, J. Discourse and power. Economy and Society, Vol. 14 (2) 1985, pp. 193-214.
    • GALBRAITH, J. K. The affluent society. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1962.
    • GAMBLE, A. Britain in decline: economic policy, political strategy and the British state. London, Macmillan, 1981.
    • GA~E, M. Textual theory: Derrida. Society, vol. 11 1982, P 199-222.
    • GARVER, N. Derrida on Rousseau on writing. The Journal of Philosphy, vol. 74 (11) 1977, 663-673.
    • GIDDENS, A. Central problems in social theory. London: Macmillan, 1979.
    • GIDDENS, A. The prospects for social theory today. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, vol. 23, 1978- 79, p. 201-223.
    • GLEDHILL, C. (editor). .~n higher education. Institute, 1981.
    • GRAHAM, . K. ?llocution and ideology: (how to do ITI::re thlngs wlth words than you realise). (In Issues In marxist philosophy: vol. 4 social and political philosophy; edited by J. Mephan & D. H. Ruben. Brighton: Harvester, 1981. p. 153-194).
    • GREER, G. The female eunuch. London: MacGibbon & Kee, 1970.
    • GRICE, H.P. Logic and conversation. (In Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3: Speech acts; edited by P.-Cole and J. L. Morgan. New York; London: Academic Press, 1975. p.41-58) .
    • GROSSBERG, L. The ideology of communication: poststructuralism and the limits of communication. Man and World, vol. 15 1982, p. 83-101.
    • HEATH, S. Difference. p. 51-112.
    • Screen, vol. 19 (3) Autumn 1978 , HEATH, S. Narrative space. Screen, vol. 17 (3), 1976, p. 68-112.
    • HEATH, S. Notes on suture. Screen, vol. 18 (4) Winter 1977-78, p. 48-76.
    • HEATH, S. The sexual fix. London: Macmillan, 1982.
    • HEATH, S. et ale eds. Signs of the times: introductory reading_s in textual seml.'otl.'cs. Cambrl.'dge?. : Gran ta?., 1974:
    • HELD, D. Introduction to critical theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. London: Hutchinson, 1980.
    • HENLEY, N. M. Power, sex and nonverbal communication. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, vol. 18 1973-74, p.l26.
    • HILL, M. A. Symbolic authority in the postmodern world: a psychoanalyst's response. Social Research, 52(2) 1985, pp. 403-410.
    • INGLIS, F. Good and bad habitus: and the condition of England. vol. 27 1979, p. 353-369.
    • JACOBSON, A., et al., eds. Readings in semantics. Urbana, Ill.: U. of Illinois Press, 1974.
    • JAMESON, F. Marxism and form: theories of literature. U.P., 1974.
    • KLINE , S: az:d ~EISS, W. Advertising, needs, and "coITmo:5.it\" f etlshlsm. Canadian Journal of Political and Social~ Theory, vol. 2 no. 1 1978, p. 5-30.
    • KRISTEVA, J. Desire in language: a semiotic approach to literature and art. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980.
    • KURZWEIL, E. The age of structuralism: Levi-Strauss to Foucault. New York: Columbia U.P., 1980.
    • MACCABE, C. On discourse. edited by C. MacCabe. 217). (In The talking cure; Macmillan, 1981. p. 188- MACCABE, C. Principles of realism and pleasure. Screen, vol. 17 (3), 1976, p. 7-28.
    • MACCABE, C. ed. The talking cure. London: Macmillan, 1981.
    • MCHOUL, A. W. Telling how texts talk: reading and ethnomethodology. London: and Kegan Paul, 1982.
    • MACEY, D. Fragments of an analysis: Lacan in context. Radical Philosophy, no. 35, 1983, p. 1-8.
    • MARX, K. Early writings. N.L.B., 1975.
    • MITCHELL, J. psychoanalysis and feminism. Penguin, 1975.
    • MONTEFIORE, A. Philosophy in France today. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P., 1983.
    • MORRIS, C. Sig~ification and significance: a study of the relatlons of signs and values. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press, 1969.
    • MORRIS, M. Operative reasoning: Michele Le Doeuff, philosophy and feminism. I & C, No.9, Winter 1981/82, p. 71-102.
    • SHANKS, M. The stagnant society: a warning. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1961.
    • WITTGENSTEIN, L. Philosophical investigations. 3rd edition, Oxford: Blackwell, 1967.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok