LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Colley, Helen (2013)
Publisher: Routledge
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: LB2300
Identifiers:doi:10.1002/berj.3112
This paper presents a research-based, theoretically-informed contribution to the debate on ‘impact’ in educational research, and specifically a response to Gardner’s presidential address to the British Educational Research Association (2011). It begins by discussing the development of the research ‘impact’ agenda as a global phenomenon, and reviews the current state of debate about ‘impact’ in the UK’s Research Excellence Framework. It goes on to argue that a radical alternative perspective on this agenda is needed, and outlines Bourdieu’s sociology – including his much-neglected concept of illusio – as offering potential for generating critical insights into demands for ‘impact’. The term illusio in particular calls us to examine the ‘stakes’ that matter in the field of educational research: the objects of value that elicit commitment from players and are ‘worth the candle’. This framework is then applied first to analyse an account of how an ESRC-funded project that I led was received by different research ‘users’ as we sought to generate impact for our findings. Second, it is used to show that the field of educational research has changed; that it has bifurcated between the field of research production and that of research reception; and that the former is being subordinated to the latter. The paper concludes by arguing that, despite many educational researchers’ commitments to ‘make a difference ‘ in wider society, the research ‘impact’ imperative is one that encroaches on academic freedom; and that academics need to find collective ways in which to resist it.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • ANVUR (2012) Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del sistema Universitario e della Ricerca (National Agency for the Evaluation of Universities and Research Institutes). Available online at: www.anvur.org (accessed 28 March 2013).
    • Australian Research Council (2011) ERA 2012 Submission Guidelines (Canberra, Australian Research Council).
    • Baker, E.L., O'Neil, H.F., Goodyear, R., Sylvester, R. and Choi, K. (n.d.) Teaching and Learning Research Programme (TLRP) Scientific Quality and Academic Impact Evaluation. Available online at: www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/EC%20Executive%20Summary%20-%20TLRP_tcm8- 22035.pdf (accessed 28 March 2013).
    • Ball. S. (2012) Global Education Inc. New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary (London, Routledge).
    • Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
    • Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (London, Routledge).
    • Bourdieu, P. (1993) Sociology in Question (London, Sage).
    • Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L.J.D. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (Cambridge, Polity Press).
    • British Educational Research Association (BERA) (2011) Ethical guidelines for educational research. Available online at: http://www.bera.ac.uk/system/files/BERA%20Ethical%20Guidelines%202011.pdf (accessed 28 March 2013).
    • Brooks, T. (2011) The academic community agree that political campaign slogans such as the Big Society have no place in research council delivery plans: the AHRC must act now. Available
    • Gardner, J. (2011) The 2010 Presidential Address. Educational research: what (a) to do about impact! British Educational Research Journal, 37(4), 543-561.
    • Gardner, J. and Pollard, A. (2008) Editorial: Knowledge transformation and impact, Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(1), 1-4.
    • Gardner, J., Holmes, B. and Leitch, R. (2008) Where there is smoke, there is (the potential for) fire: soft indicators of research and policy impact, Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(1), 89-104.
    • Golsorkhi, D., Leca, B., Lounsbury, M. & Ramirez, C. (2009) Analysing, accounting for and unmasking domination: on our role as scholars of practice, practitioners of social science and public intellectuals, Organization, 16(6), 779-797.
    • Goode, J. (2006) Research Identities: Reflections of a Contract Researcher, Sociological Research Online 11(2). Available online at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/11/2/goode.html (accessed 4 March 2013).
    • Grenfell, M. (ed.) (2008a) Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts (Durham, Acumen).
    • Grenfell, M. (2008b) Interest: in M.Grenfell (Ed.) Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts, (Durham, Acumen), 153-170.
    • Grenfell, M. & James, D. (1998) Bourdieu and education: acts of practical theory (London, Falmer Press).
    • Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) (2011) Assessment framework and guidance on submissions. Available online at www.hefce.ac.uk/research/ref/pubs/2011/02_11/ (accessed 28 March 2013).
    • HEFCE (2012) Assessment framework and guidance on submissions (updated to include addendum published in January 2012) (Bristol, HEFCE).
    • Hillage, J., Pearson, R., Anderson, A. & Tamkin, P. (1998) Excellence in schools (London, Institute for Employment Studies).
    • Hodkinson, P. (2004) Research as a form of work: expertise, community and methodological objectivity, British Educational Research Journal, 30(1), 9-26.
    • Hodkinson, P. (2008) "What works" does not work! Researching Lifelong Learning in the Culture of Audit. Valedictory lecture at the School of Continuing Education, University of Leeds, 23 June. Available online at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/172544.htm (accessed 28 March 2013).
    • International Journal of Lifelong Education (2010) Universities, research impact and public engagement, International Journal of Lifelong Education, 29(3), 287-289
    • Kostoff, R.N. (1992) Federal research impact assessment methods, Research Management Review 6(2), 22-48
    • Lewin, C. and Colley, H. (2011) Professional capacity for 14-19 career guidance in England: some baseline data. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 39(1), 1-24.
    • McCormack, B. (2011) Engaged scholarship and research impact: integrating the doing and using of research in practice, Journal of Research in Nursing, 16(2), 111-127.
    • McKibbin, R. (2010) Good for business, London Review of Books, 32(4), 9-10.
    • Mills, D. and Ratcliffe, R. (2012) After method? Ethnography in the knowledge economy, Qualitative Research, 12(2), 147-164.
    • Monbiot, G. (2011) Think of a tank. Available online at: www.monbiot.com/2011/09/12/think-of-atank (accessed 1 March 2013).
    • Monbiot, G. (2013) Secrets of the rich. Available online at: www.monbiot.com/2013/02/18/secretsof-the-rich (accessed 1 March 2013).
    • Nutley, S., Jung, T. and Walter, I. (2008) The many forms of research-informed practice: a framework for mapping diversity, Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(1), 53-71.
    • OECD (2010) OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook, Paris: OECD Publishing. Available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/sti_outlook-2010-en (accessed 28 March 2013).
    • Orland, M. (2009) Separate orbits: the distinctive worlds of educational research and policymaking, in: G.Sykes, B.Schneider, D.Plank and T.Ford (Eds) Handbook of Education Policy Research (New York, Routledge), 113-128.
    • Ozga, J., Seddon, T. and Popkewitz, T. (2006) Education research and policy: steering the knowledgebased economy, in: J.Ozga, T.Seddon and T.Popkewitz (Eds) World Yearbook of Education 2006 (London, Routledge), 1-14.
    • Parker, J. & van Teijlingen, E. (2012) The Research Excellence Framework (REF): Assessing the Impact of Social Work Research on Society, Practice: Social Work in Action, 24 (1) 41-52
    • Pawson, R. (2002) Does Megan's Law Work? A theory-driven systematic review (London, ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice: Working Paper 8). Available online at: www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/politicaleconomy/research/cep/pubs/papers/assets/wp8.p df (accessed 28 March 2013).
    • Pollard, A. (2008) Knowledge transformation and impact: aspirations and experiences from TLRP, Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(1), 5-22.
    • Reay, D. (2004) 'It's all becoming a habitus': beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 431-444
    • Reisz, M. (2010) Crisis of confidence: scholars unconvinced by REF impact pilot, Times Higher Education Supplement, (1951), 6.
    • Saunders, L. (2011) Road-crashes and war-mongering: why the notion of 'impact' in research is wrong, Research Intelligence, (114), 16-17.
    • Seddon, T., Bennett, D., Bobis, J., Bennett, S., Harrison, N., Shore, S., Smith, E., Chan, P. (2012) Living in a 2.2 world: ERA, capacity building and the topography of Australian educational research, AARE-ACDE Joint Report.
    • Shaw, T. (2011) Review: Engaged scholarship and research impact: integrating the doing and using of research in practice, Journal of Research in Nursing, 16(2), 129-131.
    • Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., Sylva, K., Sammons, P. and Melhuish, E. (2008) Towards the transformation of practice in early childhood education: the effective provision of pre-school education (EPPE) project, Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(1), 23-36.
    • Thrift, N. (2005) Knowing Capitalism (London, Sage).
    • Tooley, J. with Darby, D. (1998) Educational research: a critique. A survey of published educational research, London: OFSTED. Available online at: http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/educational-research-critique-tooley-report (accessed 28 March 2013).
    • Universities New Zealand (2012) The NZ university system. Available online at: http://www.universitiesnz.ac.nz/nz-university-system (accessed 4 March 2013).
    • Wacquant, L.J.D. (1992) Toward a social praxaeology: the structure and logic of Bourdieu's sociology, in: P.Bourdieu and L.J.D.Wacquant, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (Cambridge, Polity Press), 1-59.
    • Warde, A. (2004) Practice and Field: Revising Bourdieusian Concepts, CRIC Discussion Paper 65 (Manchester, University of Manchester).
    • Widin, J. (2010) Illegitimate Practices: Global English Language Education (Bristol, Multilingual Matters).
    • Wright Mills, C. (1959/2000) The Sociological Imagination (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article