Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Weston, Neil J. V.
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: RC1200, BF
The primary aim of the present thesis was to gain an insight into the usefulness and potential impacts of producing individual athlete performance profiles within a group environment (Butler & Hardy, 1992). Given the limited, and mainly descriptive, profiling literature, a strong two-stage research design, adhering to many of Denzin's (1978) triangulation principles, examined the perceptions of the two primary user populations (sport psychologist and athlete). Firstly British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences (BASES) accredited sport psychologists (n=6) were interviewed to provide an in depth understanding of the usefulness and impact of the technique. Higher order themes, obtained via an inductive content analysis of the interviews, were combined with a review of the literature to produce a quantitative questionnaire examining the perceptions of a large number of BASES accredited consultants (n=56). An investigation of athlete perceptions regarding the impact of the technique firstly involved employing the group performance profiling procedure (Butler & Hardy, 1992) on a male collegiate rugby union squad. Following the profiling session players (n=8) were randomly chosen and interviewed regarding their perceptions of the usefulness and impact of the technique. An inductive content analysis of the interviews produced a number of higher order themes that were combined with a review of the profiling literature to produce a quantitative questionnaire. Following the successful piloting of the questionnaire ten group performance profiling sessions were performed with a variety of sports teams. On completion of the profiling sessions athletes (n=191) were asked to complete the questionnaire to help ascertain what athletes perceived to be the most important impacts of performance profiling within a group environment. Inspection of both the consultant and athlete responses to the qualitative and quantitative procedures indicated that group profiling is useful in increasing athlete self awareness, evaluating performance, as a basis for goal setting, and enhancing communication and interaction both within teams and between athlete and coach. In addition, both consultants and athletes believed that performance profiling within a group environment would help to improve athlete intrinsic motivation. Hence the final study examined experimentally the impact of repeated group performance profiling on athletes' intrinsic motivation. Results showed that profiling on three occasions within a competitive season is useful in significantly improving athlete intrinsic motivation. The findings provide empirical support for Butler and Hardy's (1992) suggestion that performance profiling would positively influence athlete intrinsic motivation.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • I. ~'ortIk: pl~.. -: I 1"1 in hvina 11"':'111111&':~fh!rI~IIro.: . "'.
    • 2. fur It. : pk...wr.: it aiV.::l ~ IQ Iuktw nlo(,:~" Ilk: ... , I rr.I-.:1it.:.::.
    • .. for lh.: pl-:.urc of "i~ovcri"l new ,.... jnin, t ..".1,;h.. i,lu ...".
    • ~, I "'..,'1 know an!m'Ol'~; I tuv,.: the: im,...~i,NI th ... I .MII ilk:a .... hl..: u...... ..:t.:4h.-dinl& in .hi:.. spurt.
    • 6. fi«o1UM il 30110","m'e W he well rcpttkd h~ ......",1. : Ihal I .......", 7. lS«auu, in my opinion. it i.on. utshc ~ w .. ~·, In nh: .... p..:url..: I. B.:l.:a~ 11«1 3. JOI of pcnonalllllisf~ ...iu" wh,l~ ...........,.in~ ..:...1,li .. liillicul • .,.,ninllo
    • III for Ih.o prcsti.., of ...inl ... 0' '1.1<.
    • II 8ct:auN il i.onc uflh.: ttc. wa~ 1 hAve chork:n h, ~\.to:Iup ,tlh ..., .bp:~1a ...rm)s-:If 11 For rh.: pI~uurc I feci ",hil. imrroVH11 Jt)ftN uf IU~'\\.:~L ruil'" I 1. For the .,,,dl.sn.mll rHI WMn I un Nally "', ..oh..:.1 in Ilk: oa.;ll\ily.
    • 14. 11. . ,. . . IIIIWII do """" 10 I... , .-I"""'" nl~""U: I S. F« lh-: ulil,a..1iua I c"J'Cl"i~ _hilc I an, p.'fI ~..l.iu" 111:'- thli ..,..
    • 16 lk."\:au!iC fNOl"le around 1M Chink it ill impur\ ••,.. hi I~ N' ~ I'tt: 17. ltcc.:.1us.e il ia a .,.. way 10 I.=am 'UCK"'Ihi" .." "·1......' .:,)l h. : u~lullo lit.: in .,.............. of my lir.
    • 18 For Ih.o illl .:muIiuns Ihot I r.. 1 ",hit. I "" "',ill~ • ,.,..NI Ihdl I tiL•.
    • 19 II .s nut . :Ic: 10 ~ iU1)1IkJI'e: I don't n:ally tb'nL "'~. pI .-.:IS in ~1I1.
    • 20. FtM'IIw pl..:uure ttwl I ful while c~ccu.i", ...:.., .. in dil1i dl nkl\ ..'II""..' '.
    • 21. 8c'::luJC I would f«1 bAd if I wu nut c.D.iI,,, lillh: h ...... it U l" ......."""""......s-dI s-d ••my"P'''' 23. "'or like pleuurc tN.I I fellt' hil.: I.:;amin, lrami .. , 1.:..:hlli'IU':" 1I1i.I I hilve ...,,,,,IIi'" hor....
    • 24 ~:-.;auSC' il is llnC O(thc hal w:lYllu ntainwin ~uu.1r~I,ui,'t'..h. il'" "illt my friendl 2~. U,."caU)k: .Iikc the raelinS Ot'twinSIOl.1l1y in,.n..:r~,1 in Ih.: "~Ii\ily 26 a... .u.. I ....... do sporu ' .... Iarly.
    • 27. fur Itt..: pkuur .. ot'di..:ov.mnll fWW ~"'t)fft ...,....: ' .•I..:gl ...'" 2M. I oft..... uII. m),sdr; I c.:an't~cm 10 oat:hic\.: tit..: .:n.. I lh.11 I ~1 J~1f' m~~Ir.
    • 0 rM OO 0 '
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article