Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Collins, Harold Maurice; Evans, Robert John; Weinel, Martin; Lyttleton-Smith, Jennifer; Hall, Martin; Bartlett, Andrew (2017)
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: H1
We describe the Imitation Game, a new research method that collects both qualitative and quantitative data, and which can be used as a mixed methods procedure in many disciplines. Drawing on two projects, one investigating gender, the other sexuality, we show that the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the Game combine in four different ways, from more quantitative to more qualitative, involving increasing cultural understanding by the researchers. Crucially, deep cultural input is initially supplied by the players of the Game, who act as “proxy researchers,” enabling data to be gathered quickly and efficiently. The analysis has its roots in sociology of scientific knowledge and studies of expertise and experience, hence the emphasis on the cultural foundations of methods and the nature of expertise.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Collins, H.M., & Evans, R.J. (2007). Rethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    • Collins, H.M., & Evans, R.J. (2002). The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience. Social Studies of Sciences, 32, 235-296.
    • Collins, H.M., Evans, R.J., Ribeiro, R., & Hall, M. (2006). Experiments with Interactional Expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 37, 656-74.
    • Collins, H.M., & Kusch, M. (1998). The Shape of Actions: What Humans and Machines Can Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    • Creswell, J.W., & Plano Clark, V.L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    • Evans, R.J., & Crocker, H. (2013). The Imitation Game as a Method for Exploring Knowledge(s) of Chronic Illness. Methodological Innovations Online, 7.
    • Forman, P. (1971). Weimar Culture, Causality and Quantum Theory, 1918-1927: Adaptation by German Physicists and Mathematicians to a Hostile Intellectual Environment. In R. McCormack (Ed.), Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, No 3 (pp 1-115). Philadelphia, VA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    • Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Turner, L.A. (2007). Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(April): 112-133.
    • Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative Research: Introducing Focus Groups. BMJ, 311, 299-302.
    • Mackenzie, D. (1981). Statistics in Britain 1865-1930. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    • Mackenzie, D. (2001). Mechanizing Proof: Computing, Risk, and Trust. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.
    • Morgan, D.L. (1996). Focus Groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129-152.
    • Morgan, D.L. (1995). Why Things (Sometimes) Go Wrong in Focus Groups. Qualitative Health Research, 5, 516 - 523.
    • Turing, A.M. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind, LIX, 236,433-460.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • EC | IMCOM

Cite this article