LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Pornari, Chrysoula; Wood, Jane L.
Publisher: Wiley Diss
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: H

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: education
Identifiers:doi:10.1002/ab.20336
This study investigated the relationship between cognitive mechanisms, applied by people to rationalize and justify harmful acts, and engagement in traditional peer and cyber aggression among school children. We examined the contribution of moral disengagement (MD), hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies, and we further explored the individual contribution of each MD mechanism. Our aim was to identify shared and unique cognitive factors of the two forms of aggression. Three hundred and thirty-nine secondary school children completed self-report measures that assessed MD, hostile attribution bias, outcome expectancies, and their roles and involvement in traditional and cyber aggression. We found that the MD total score positively related to both forms of peer-directed aggression. Furthermore, traditional peer aggression positively related to children's moral justification, euphemistic language, displacement of responsibility and outcome expectancies, and negatively associated with hostile attribution bias. Moral justification also related positively to cyber aggression. Cyber aggression and cyber victimization were associated with high levels of traditional peer aggression and victimization, respectively. The results suggest that MD is a common feature of both traditional and cyber peer aggression, but it seems that traditional forms of aggression demand a higher level of rationalization or justification. Moreover, the data suggest that the expectation of positive outcomes from harmful behavior facilitates engagement in traditional peer aggression. The differential contribution of specific cognitive mechanisms indicates the need for future research to elaborate on the current findings, in order to advance theory and inform existing and future school interventions tackling aggression and bullying.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bentley, K. M., & Li, A. (1995). Bully and victim problems in elementary schools and Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 11, 153 165.
    • Berger, K. S. (2007). Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten? Developmental Review, 27, 90-126.
    • Berkowitz, L. (1989). Situational influences on aggression. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 356-360). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Björkqvist, K., Ekman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1982). Bullying and victims: Their ego picture, ideal ego picture and normative ego picture. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23, 307-313.
    • Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Österman, K. (1992). The Direct and Indirect Aggression Scales. Vasa, Finland: Abo Akademi University, Department of Social Sciences.
    • Blasi, A. (1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 1-45.
    • Bosworth, K., Espelage, D. L., & Simon, T. R. (1999). Factors associated with bullying behavior in middle school students. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 341-362.
    • Camodeca, M., Goossens, F. A., Terwogt, M. M, & Schuengel, C. (2002). Bullying and victimization among school-age children: Stability and links to proactive and reactive aggression. Social Development, 11, 332 345.
    • Campbell, M. A. (2005). Cyber bullying: An old problem in a new guise? Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 15, 68 76.
    • Dodge, K. A., Murphy, R. R., & Bachsbaum, K. (1984). The assessment of intention-cue detection skills in children: Implications for developmental psychopathology. Child Development, 55, 163-173.
    • Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., McClaskey, C. L., & Brown, M. M. (1986). Social competence in children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Serial No. 213, Vol. 51, No. 2.
    • Duncan, R. D. (1999). Peer and sibling aggression: An investigation of intra- and extrafamilial bullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 871-886. aggression and their behavior. Social Development, 7, 321-339.
    • Espelage, D. L., Bosworth, K., & Simon, T. (2001). Short-term stability and change of bullying in middle school students: An examination of demographic, psychosocial, and environmental correlates. Violence & Victims, 16, 411-426.
    • Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K. J., & Wolak, J. (2000). Online victimization: A report of the Retrieved May 5, 2003, from http://www.htcia. org/isfc/2000.pdf
    • Gambino, R. (1973). Watergate lingo: A language of non-responsibility. Freedom at Issue, 22, 7-9.
    • Gibbs, J. C., Potter, G. B., & Goldstein, A. P. (1995). The EQUIP program: Teaching youth to think and act responsibly through a peer-helping approach. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
    • Behavior, 32, 528-539.
    • Griffin, R. S., & Gross, A. M. (2004). Childhood bullying: Current empirical findings and future directions for research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 379-400.
    • Guerra, N. G., & Slaby, R. G. (1989). Evaluative factors in social problem solving by aggressive boys. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17, 277-289.
    • Hara, H. (2002). Justifications for bullying among Japanese schoolchildren. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 197-204.
    • Hawker, D. S. J., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 441-455.
    • Haynie, D. L., Nansel, T. R., Eitel, P., Davis Crump, A., Saylor, K., Yu, K., et al. (2001). Bullies, victims and bully/victims: Distinct groups of at-risk youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 29-49.
    • Hymel. S., Rocke-Henderson, N., & Bonanno, R. A. (2005). Moral Disengagement: A framework for understanding bullying among adolescents. Journal of Social Sciences, Special Issue 8, 1-11.
    • Kroll, J., & Egan, E. (2004). Psychiatry, moral worry, and moral emotions. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 10, 352 360.
    • Li, Q. (2006). C-bullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27, 157 170.
    • Menesini, E., & Camodeca, M. (2008). Shame and guilt as behavior regulators: Relationships with bullying, victimization and prosocial behavior. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26, 183-196.
    • Menesini E, Fonzi V, & Vannucci M. (1997, August). Bullies and victims in Italy: Attitudes and moral disengagement. Paper presented at the 7th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction EARLI, Athens, Greece.
    • Menesini, E., Sanchez, V., Fonzi, A., Ortega, R., Costabile, A., & Lo Feudo, G. (2003). Moral emotions and bullying: A cross-national comparison of differences between bullies, victims and outsiders. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 515 530.
    • Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M. D., Saluja, G., & Ruan, W. J. (2004). Cross-national consistency in the relationship between bullying behaviors and psychosocial adjustment. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 158, 730-736.
    • NCH (2002). NCH 2002 Survey, 2004-07-15. Retrieved May 10, 2008, from http://www.nch.org.uk/itok/showquestion.asp?faq=9&fldAuto=145
    • NCH (2005). Putting U in the picture Mobile phone bullying survey 2005. Retrieved March 30, 2008, from http://www.nch.org.uk/uploads/ documents/ Mobile_bullying_% 20report.pdf
    • Noret, N. & Rivers, I. (2006, April). The prevalence of bullying by text message or email: Results of a four year study. Poster presented at the Annual Conference of the British Psychological Society, Cardiff.
    • Oliver, C., & Candappa, M. (2003). Tackling bullying: Listening to the views of children and young people. Department of Education and Skills, Nottingham. Reteived May 10, 2008, from http://www.dfes.gov.uk/ bullying/pdf/Childline %20DP%20Bullying %20(download).pdf
    • Olweus, D. (1999). Sweden. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. F. Catalano, & P. T. Slee (Eds.), The nature of school bullying: A Crossnational perspective (pp. 7-27). London: Routledge.
    • Orobio de Castro, B., Veerman, J. W., Koops, W., Bosch, J. D., & Monshouwer, H. J. (2002). Hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behavior: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 73, 916 934.
    • Österman, K., Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., Charpentier, S., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1999). Locus of control and three types of aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 61-65.
    • Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2001). Dominance in early adolescent boys: Affiliative and aggressive dimensions and possible functions. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47, 142-163.
    • Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition form primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259-280.
    • Perry, D. G., Perry, L. C., & Rasmussen, P. (1986). Cognitive social learning mediators of aggression. Child Development, 57, 700 711.
    • Picket, W., Schmid, H., Boyce, W., Simpson, K., Scheidt, P. C., Mazur, J., et al. (2002). Multiple risk behavior and injury: an international analysis of young people. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 156, 786 793.
    • Polman, H., de Castro, B. O., Koops, W., van Boxtel, H. W., & Merk, W. W (2007). A MetaAnalysis of the distinction between reactive and proactive aggression in children and adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 522-535.
    • Quiggle, N., Garber, J., Panak, W., & Dodge, K. A. (1992). Social information-processing in aggressive and depressed children. Child Development, 63, 1305-1320.
    • Raskauskas, J. & Stoltz, A. D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43, 564 575.
    • Rivers, I., & Smith, P. K. (1994). Types of bullying behavior and their correlates. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 359-368.
    • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28.
    • Chrisa D. Pornari, Department of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK; Jane Wood, Department of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NP, UK.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article