Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Tao, Ying; Oliver, Mary; Venville, Grady (2013)
Publisher: Wiley
Languages: English
Types: Article
Set in the context of today’s globalized approaches to curriculum reform, the purpose of this study was to compare the teaching and learning of science in Chinese and Australian Grade 6 classrooms. A conceptual framework based on notions of culture and socioeconomic status informed the research design. Case study participants were three teachers of science and 140 students from three elementary schools of high, medium, and low socioeconomic status in Hunan Province, China; and three teachers and 105 students from paired schools in Western Australia. The formal curriculum, the curriculum-in-action, and the experiential curriculum in all case studies in each country were examined. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected with student questionnaires, lesson observations, teacher interviews, a school tour, and document collection. Findings indicated that participating Chinese students reported a greater proportion of their science lessons involved activities such as reading textbooks and memorizing facts, activities that are consistent with Confucian educational culture. In Australia, where there has been a longer historical influence from social-constructivist theorists such as Bruner and Vygotsky, students reported their lessons involved a greater proportion of activities such as designing and doing science experiments, and working in small groups. The findings also indicated that in both countries, socioeconomic status was an important factor impacting the implementation of the science curriculum with students in higher socioeconomic status schools participating more frequently in classroom activities consistent with reform curriculum documents. This phenomenon was more apparent in China possibly due to the Confucian educational tradition supporting culturally viable alternative approaches to the teaching and learning of science.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Adamson, B. (2012). International comparative studies in teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(2012), 641-648.
    • Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Huang, T. C. (1999). Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research methods. Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 48-61.
    • Alexander, R. (2000). Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
    • Allen, P. J., & Bennett, K. (2008). SPSS for the health and behavioural sciences. South Melbourne, Australia: Thomson.
    • An, S. H. (2004). Capturing the Chinese way of teaching: The learning-questioning and learning-reviewing instructional model. In L. H. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. F. Cai & S. Q. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders. London: World Scientific Publishing.
    • Anderson, R. D. (2007). Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 807-830). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    • APEC Human Resources Development Working Group. (2006). Innovation on Science Curriculum in China. Retrieved December 12th, 2011, from http://hrd.apec.org/index.php/Science_Curriculum_and_Instruction
    • Appleton, K. (2007). Elementary science teaching. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 493-536). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Western Australia State Statistical Indicators. Retrieved November 7th, 2011, from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/1367.0~2011~Main%20Features~Weste rn%20Australia~19
    • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2011). The Australian curriculum: Science. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Science
    • Berben, L., Sereika, S. M., & Engberg, S. (2012). Effect size estimation: Methods and examples. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49, 1039-1047.
    • Biggs, J. B. (1966). Western misconceptions of the Confucian-heritage learning culture. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner: cultural, psychological and contextual influences (pp. 45-68). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.
    • Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Chang, C. Y., & Mao, S. L. (1999). Comparison of Taiwan science students' outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 92(6), 340-346.
    • Chen, Q. (2004a). Reflection upon the current primary science education. Beijing Education, 7, 15-17 [in Chinese].
    • Chiu, M.-H., & Duit, R. (2011). Globalization: Science education from an international perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 553-566.
    • Cai, J. F., & Lester, F. (2007). Contributions from cross-national comparative studies to the internationalization of mathematics education: Studies of Chinese and U.S classrooms. In B. Atweh, A. C. Barton, M. Borba, N. Gough, C. Keitel, C. Vistro-Yu & R. Vithal (Eds.), Internationalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education (pp. 269-283). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
    • Cobern, W. W., Schuster, D., Adams, B., Applegate, B., Skjold, B., Undreiu, A., et al. (2010). Experimental comparison of inquiry and direct instruction in science. Research in Science and Technological Education, 28(1), 81-96.
    • Cogan, L. S., Wang, H. A., & Schmidt, W. H. (2001). Culturally specific patterns in the conceptualization of the school science curriculum: insights from TIMSS. Studies in Science Education, 36, 105-133.
    • Coll, R. K., & Taylor, N. (2012). An international perspective on science curriculum development and implementation. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (eds.), Second international handbook of science education (Vol II, pp. 771-782). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
    • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    • Cortazzi, M. (1998). Learning from Asian lessons: Cultural expectations and classroom talk. Education 3-13, 26(2), 42-49.
    • Curriculum Branch Education Department of Western Australia. (1986). Transition science 7-8: An integrated curriculum approach. Perth, Western Australia: Government Printer, WA.
    • Curriculum Corporation (1994). A statement on science for Australian schools. Melbourne: Author.
    • Curriculum Council Western Australia. (1998). Curriculum Framework Learning Statement for Science. Retrieved 20 March, 2009, from http://www.curriculum.wa.edu.au/internet/Years_K10/Curriculum_Framework
    • Dawson, V., & Venville, G. (2012). The Australian science curriculum. In G. Venville & V. Dawson (Eds.), The art of teaching science: For middle and secondary schools (pp. 122-135). Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
    • Department of Education of Hunan Province. (2011). Educational Statistics in 2010. Retrieved November 7th, 2011, from http://gov.hnedu.cn/web/0/201109/08173319740.html
    • Dillon, S. (2010). Top test scores from Shanghai stun eductors. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
    • Ding, B. (2008). Learning from other countries: A critical examination of the current primary science curriculum reforms in mainland China. In R. K. Coll & N. Taylor (Eds.), Science educational in context: An international examination of the influence of context on science curricula development and implementation (pp. 343-352). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
    • Division of Primary Education Ministry of Education [China]. (2002). Interpretation of science curriculum standard (3-6 Grade) for full-time compulsory education. Wuhan: Hubei Education Press [in Chinese].
    • Fensham, P. (2007). Contextual or culture: Can TIMSS and PISA teach us about what determines educational achievement in science? In B. Atweh et al., (Eds.), Internationalisation and globalisation in mathematics and science education (pp. 151-172). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
    • Fogleman, J., McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Examining the effect of teachers' adaptations of a middle school science inquiry-oriented curriculum unit on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 149-169.
    • Gao, L. B. (1995). Cutural influences on physics education. Australia Journal of Physics 48, 259-265.
    • Gao, L. B. (1998). Cultural context of school science teaching and learning in the People's Republic of China. Science Education, 82(1), 1-13.
    • Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs
    • Guo, C.-J. (2007). Issues in science learning: An international perspective. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 227-256). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    • Hackling, M. W. (1998). Working scientifically: Implementing and assessing open investigation work in science. Perth, Australia: Education Department of Western Australia.
    • Hu, W. P., Han, Q., & Liu, J. W. (2007). Investigation into and thoughts of the current situation of the implementation of new curriculum of science in the primary schools. Theory and Practice of Education, 27(3), 58-63 [in Chinese].
    • Hunan Provincial Government. (2011). Brief Introduction of Hunan Province. Retrieved November 7th, 2011, from http://enghunan.gov.cn/AboutHNprovince/Snapshot/Introducton/
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article