Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Lacewing, Michael (2018)
Languages: English
Types: Article
For psychoanalysis to qualify as scientific psychology, it needs to generate data that can evidentially support theoretical claims. Its methods, therefore, must at least be capable of correcting for biases produced in the data during the process of generating it; and we must be able to use the data in sound forms of inference and reasoning. Critics of psychoanalysis have claimed that it fails on both counts, and thus whatever warrant its claims have derive from other sources. In this article, I discuss three key objections, and then consider their implications together with recent developments in the generation and testing of psychoanalytic theory. The first and most famous is that of ‘suggestion’; if it sticks, clinical data may be biased in a way that renders all inferences from them unreliable. The second, sometimes confused with the first, questions whether the data are or can be used to provide genuine tests of theoretical hypotheses. The third will require us to consider the question of how psychology can reliably infer motives from behavior. I argue that the clinical method of psychoanalysis is defensible against these objections in relation to the psychodynamic model of mind, but not wider metapsychological and etiological claims. Nevertheless, the claim of psychoanalysis to be a science would be strengthened if awareness of the methodological pitfalls and means to avoid them, and alternative theories and their evidence bases, were more widespread. This may require changes in the education of psychoanalysts.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Andersen, S. M., & Chen, S. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Review, 109(4), 619-645.
    • Andersen, S. M., & Glassman, N. S. (1996). Responding to significant others when they are not there: Effects on interpersonal inference, motivation, and affect. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 262-321). New York: Guilford Press.
    • Andersen, S. M., & Thorpe, J. S. (2009). An IF-THEN theory of personality: Significant others and the relational self. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(2), 163-170.
    • Bargh, J. (2005). Bypassing the will: toward demystifying the nonconscious control of social behaviour. In In: Hassin, R.R., Uleman J.S., and Bargh J.A. (Eds). The New Unconscious, 37-58. Oxford University Press, Oxford
    • Brearley, M. 2008. What do psychoanalysts do? In The academic face of psychoanalysis, ed. L. Braddock and M. Lacewing, 20-32. London: Routledge.
    • Conte, H. and Plutchik, R. (eds) (1995). Ego defenses: Theory and measurement. New York: John Wiley.
    • Cramer, P. (2006). Protecting the self: Defense mechanisms in action. New York: Guilford Press.
    • Dahl, H. (1972). A quantitative study of a psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Science, 1(1), 237-257.
    • Dahl, H., Kächele, H., and Thomä, H. (1988). Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategies. Berlin: Springer.
    • Eagle, M. (1997). Attachment and psychoanalysis. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 70(3), 217- 229.
    • Eagle, M. (2011). From Classical to Contemporary Psychoanalysis: A Critique and Integration. New York: Routledge.
    • Erwin, E. (1996). A Final Accounting: Philosophical and Empirical Issues in Freudian Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
    • Eysenck, H.J., Arnold, W.J. & Meili, R. (1975). Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol II). Bungay, Suffolk: Fontana.
    • Feldman-Barrett, Niedenthal, & Winkielman, P. (2005). Emotion and consciousness. New York: Guilford Press.
    • Fischer, C. & Kächele, H. (2009). Comparative analysis of patients' dreams in Freudian and Jungian therapy. International Journal of Psychotherapy 13, 34-40.
    • Fisher, S. and Greenberg, R. P. (1977). The Scientific Credibility of Freud's Theories and Therapy. New York: Basic Books.
    • Fletcher, G. J. O. (1995). The Scientific Credibility of Folk Psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Fonagy, P. (2001). Attachment Theory and Psychoanalysis. London: Other Press.
    • Fonagy, P. and Target, M. (2003). Psychoanalytic Theories: Perspectives from Developmental Psychopathology. London: Whurr.
    • Freud, S. (1914). On the history of the psycho-analytic movement. In: J. Strachey (Ed.) Standard Edition, Vol. XIV. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 1-66.
    • Freud, S. (1917). Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis (Part III). In J. Strachey (Trans., Ed.) The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. XVI, pp. 241-463). London: Hogarth.
    • Freud, S. (1937). Constructions in analysis. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, ed., trans. J. Strachey, vol. 23: 255-69. London: Hogarth.
    • Gardner, S. (2000). Psychoanalysis and the personal/sub-personal distinction, Philosophical Explorations, 1, 96-119.
    • Gawronski, B. (2004). Theory-based bias correction in dispositional inference: the fundamental attribution error is dead, long live the correspondence bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 15(1), 183-217.
    • Gellner, E. (1985). The Psychoanalytic Movement. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
    • Gheorghiu, V. (1989). The difficulty in explaining suggestion: some conceivable solutions. In V. A. Gheorghiu, P. Netter, H.J. Eysenck & R. Rosenthal (Eds.), Suggestion and suggestibility (pp. 99-112). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
    • Gheorghiu, V.A., Netter, P., Eysenck, H.J. & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Preface. In V. A. Gheorghiu, P. Netter, H.J. Eysenck & R. Rosenthal (Eds.), Suggestion and suggestibility (pp. ix-xi). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
    • Gilbert, D., and E. Jones. 1986. Perceiver-induced constraint: Interpretations of self- generated reality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50, no. 2:269-80.
    • Gill, M. M. (1982). Analysis of Transference Vol. 1: Theory and Technique. New York: International Universities Press.
    • Gill, M. M. and Hoffman, I. Z. (1982). Analysis of Transference Vol. 2: Studies of Nine Audio-Recorded Psychoanalytic Sessions. New York: International Universities Press.
    • Grünbaum, A. (1984). The Foundations of Psychoanalysis: A Philosophical Critique. Berkeley: Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
    • Grünbaum, A. (2004). The hermeneutic versus the scientific conception of psychoanalysis. In: J. Mills (Ed.) Psychoanalysis at the Limit: Epistemology, Mind, and the Question of Science. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 139-60.
    • Hirt, E. R. and Markman, K. D. (1995). Multiple explanation: a consider-an-alternative strategy for debiasing judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1069-1089.
    • Holmes, J. (2000). Attachment theory and psychoanalysis: a rapprochement. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 17(2), 157-172.
    • Hopkins, J. (1988). Epistemology and depth psychology: critical notes on The Foundations of Psychoanalysis. In: P. Clark and C. Wright (Eds.) Mind, Psychoanalysis and Science. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 33-60.
    • Jones, E., and V. Harris. 1967. The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 3, no. 1:1-24.
    • Jopling, D. (2008). Talking Cures and Placebo Effects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Kelley, H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. New York: General Learning Press.
    • ---. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist 28, no. 2:107-28.
    • Kernberg, O. F. (2000). A concerned critique of psychoanalytic education. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 81(1), 97-120.
    • Kernberg, O. F. (2006). The coming changes in psychoanalytic education: Part I. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 87(6), 1650-1673.
    • Kernberg, O. F. (2007). The coming changes in psychoanalytic education: Part II. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 88(1), 183-202.
    • Kernberg, O. (2010). A New Organization of Psychoanalytic Education. Psychoanalytic Review, 97(6), 997-1020.
    • Kitcher, P. (1992). Freud's Dream : A Complete Interdisciplinary Science of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
    • Klein, G. S. (1976). Psychoanalytic Theory: An Exploration of Essentials. New York: International Universities Press.
    • Knekt, P., Lindfors, O., Härkänen, T. et al. (2007). Randomized trial on the effectiveness of long- and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and solution-focused therapy on psychiatric symptoms during a 3-year follow-up. Psychological Medicine, 38, 689-703.
    • Knekt, P., Lindfors, O., Laaksonen, M. A., Renlund, C., Haaramo, P., Härkänen, T., Virtala, E., & the Helsinki Psychotherapy Study Group (2011). Quasi-experimental study on the effectiveness of psychoanalysis, long-term and short-term psychotherapy on psychiatric symptoms, work ability and functional capacity during a 5-year follow-up. Journal of Affective Disorders, 132, 37-47.
    • Lacewing, M. (2007). Do Unconscious Emotions Involve Unconscious Feelings?. Philosophical Psychology 20, 81-104.
    • Lacewing, M. (2012). Inferring motives in psychology and psychoanalysis. Philosophy, Psychiatry Lacewing, M. (2013). The problem of suggestion: an analysis and solution. Philosophical Psychology, DOI:10.1080/09515089.2012.725533
    • Leichsenring, F. (2011). Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in complex mental disorders: update of a meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 199, 15-22.
    • Leichsenring, F. and Rabung, S. (2008). Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 300(13), 1551-1565.
    • Levy, Ablon & Kächele (2011). Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Research. Berlin: Humana Press.
    • Levy, S. & Inderbitzin, L. (2000). Suggestion and psychoanalytic technique. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 48(3), 739-758.
    • Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., and Preston, E. (1984). Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1231-1243.
    • Lowe, E. J. (2007) Between agent causationism and volitionism: a middle path. In F. Castellani & J. Quitterer (Eds.) Agency and Causation in the Human Sciences. Paderborn: Mentis, 77-88.
    • Luborsky, L. (1977). Measuring a pervasive psychic structure in psychotherapy: the core conflictual relationship theme. In: N. Freedman and S. Grand (Eds.) Communicative Structures and Psychic Structures. New York: Plenum, pp. 367-395.
    • Luborsky, E. and Luborsky, L. (2006). Research and Psychotherapy: the Vital Link ??: Jason Aronson.
    • Luborsky, L. (2001). The only clinical and quantitative study since Freud of the preconditions for recurrent symptoms during psychotherapy and psychoanalysis. International Journal of PsychoAnalysis, 82(6), 1133-54.
    • de Maat, S., de Jonghe, F., Schoevers, R., and Dekker, J. (2009). The effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic therapy: a systematic review of empirical studies. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 17(1), 1-23.
    • Manson, N. 2003. Freud's own blend. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103:179-95.
    • Masling, J. M. and Bornstein, R. F. (1983-1998). Empirical Studies of Psychoanalytic Theories, Vols IVIII. Hillsdale NJ: The Analytic Press.
    • Mayr, E. (2011). Understanding Human Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Miller, R. 1988. A clinical science. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18, no. 4:659-79.
    • Nisbett, R. E. and Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231-259.
    • Nisbett, R. E. and Ross, L. (1980). Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    • Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    • Popper, K. (1983). Realism and the Aim of Science. London: Hutchinson.
    • Popper, K. (1995). The Open Society and its Enemies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    • Rosenblatt, A. D. (1989). Reinspecting the foundations of psychoanalysis: a rejoinder to Adolph Grünbaum. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 12(1), 73-96.
    • Rosenthal, R. (2000). Expectancy effects. In A.E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Psychology (pp. 294- 6). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
    • Rosenthal, R. and Rosnow, R. L. (2009). Artifacts in Behavioral Research: Robert Rosenthal and Ralph L. Rosnow's Classic Books. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Rudder-Baker, L. 1987. Saving belief: A critique of physicalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    • ---. 1999. What is this thing called commonsense psychology? Philosophical Explorations 2, no. 1:3-19.
    • Schwanenberg, E. (1989). Suggestion as social biasing of meaning tests. In V. A. Gheorghiu, P. Netter, H.J. Eysenck & R. Rosenthal (Eds.), Suggestion and suggestibility (pp. 263-78). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
    • Shedler, J. (2010). The efficacy of psychodynamic psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 65(2), 98- 109.
    • Shevrin, H. et al (1996). Conscious and unconscious processes: Psychodynamic, Cognitive, and Neurophysiological Convergences. New York: Guilford Press.
    • Vaillant, G. E. (1993). The Wisdom of the Ego. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Valone, K. (2005). Consilient Psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 22(2), 189-206.
    • Wallerstein, R. (1988). One psychoanalysis or many? International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 69(1), 5-21.
    • Wallerstein, R. S. (1990). Psychoanalysis: the common ground. International Journal of PsychoAnalysis, 71, 3-20.
    • Wallerstein, R. S. (2005). Psychoanalytic controversies: will psychoanalytic pluralism be an enduring state of our discipline?. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 86(3), 623-638.
    • Wallerstein, R. (2006). The relevance of Freud's psychoanalysis in the 21st century: Its science and its research. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23(2), 302-326.
    • Wampold, B. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings. Hillsdale, NJ:
    • Westen, D. (1998). The scientific legacy of Sigmund Freud: toward a psychodynamically informed psychological science. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 333-371.
    • Westen, D. (1999). The scientific status of unconscious processes: is Freud really dead?. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47(4), 1061-1106.
    • Westen, D. and Gabbard, G. O. (2002a). Developments in cognitive neuroscience: I. Conflict, compromise, and connectionism. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 50(1), 53-98.
    • Westen, D. and Gabbard, G. O. (2002b). Developments in cognitive neuroscience: II. Implications for theories of transference. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 50(1), 99-134.
    • Wilson, T. (2002). Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious. Cambridge: Belknap.
    • Winkielman, P., Berridge, K. C., & Wilbarger, J. L. (2005). Emotion, behaviour, and conscious experience: Once more without feeling. In L. Feldman-Barrett, P. Niedenthal, & P. Winkielman (Eds.), Emotion and consciousness. New York: Guilford Press.
    • Winkielman, P., Berridge, K., & Sher, S. (2011) Emotion, consciousness, and social behaviour. In J. Decety & J. T. Cacioppo (Eds.), Handbook of social neuroscience (pp. 195-211). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article