Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Chudleigh, Jane; Buckingham, Sarah; Dignan, Jo; O’Driscoll, Sandra; Johnson, Kemi; Rees, David; Wyatt, Hilary; Metcalfe, Alison (2016)
Publisher: Springer Nature
Journal: Journal of Genetic Counseling
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: RT, Genetics(clinical), Cystic fibrosis, Psychosocial, Original Research, Newborn screening, Sickle cell disease

Classified by OpenAIRE into

mesheuropmc: embryonic structures, food and beverages

The clinical advantages of the newborn screening programme (NBS) in the UK are well described in the literature. However, there has been little exploration of the psychosocial impact on the family. This study followed the principles of grounded theory to explore parents' experiences of receiving the initial positive NBS result for their child with cystic fibrosis (CF) or sickle cell disease (SCD). Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted with 22 parents (12 mothers and 10 fathers) whose children had been diagnosed with CF or SCD via NBS and were under the age of 1 year at the time of interview. The main themes that arose from the data were; parents previous knowledge of the condition and the NBS programme, the method of delivery and parental reactions to the result, sharing the results with others, the impact on parental relationships and support strategies. Study conclusions indicate that most parents thought initial positive NBS results should be delivered by a health professional with condition specific knowledge, preferably with both parents present. Genetic counselling needs to include a focus on the impact of NBS results on parental relationships. Careful consideration needs to be given to strategies to support parents of babies who have positive NBS results both in terms of the psychological health and to assist them in sharing the diagnosis.

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Asplin, D. (2008). Telling the parents: newborn blood spot screening for cystic fibrosis. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 101(Suppl 1), S28-S30. doi:10.1258/jrsm.2008.s18006.
    • Barroso, J. (2010). Qualitative approaches to research. In G. LoBiondoWood & J. Haber (Eds.), Nursing research (pp. 100-125). Texas: Reprinted from: 7thElsevier.
    • Buchbinder, M., & Timmermans, S. (2012). Newborn screening for metabolic disorders: parental perceptions of the initial communication of results. Clinical Pediatrics (Phila), 51(8), 739-744. doi:10.1177/ 0009922812446011.
    • Bush, A. (2008). Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis - benefit or bane? Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, 9, 301-302.
    • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
    • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd Edition ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
    • Collins, J. L., La Pean, A., O'Tool, F., Eskra, K. L., Roedl, S. J., Tluczek, A., & Farrell, M. H. (2012). Factors that influence parents' experiences with results disclosure after newborn screening identifies genetic carrier status for cystic fibrosis or sickle cell hemoglobinopathy. Patient Education and Counseling. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.12. 007.
    • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd Edition ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
    • Daniel, D., & Henthorn, J. (2012). Sickle Cell and Thalassaemia Handbook for Laboratories. Retrieved from London: https://www. gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/ 398702/LabHandbook2012Edition3v2.pdf.
    • DeLuca, J. M., Kearney, M. H., Norton, S. A., & Arnold, G. L. (2011). Parents' experiences of expanded newborn screening evaluations. Pediatrics, 128(1), 53-61. doi:10.1542/peds.2010-3413.
    • DoH (2000). The NHS plan. A plan for investment. A plan for reform. London: Stationery Office.
    • Green, A., Isherwood, D., Pollitt, R., Griffiths, P., Griffiths, W., Goddard, P., & Scott, E. (2014). A Laboratory Guide to Newborn Screening in the UK for Cystic Fibrosis. Retrieved from London: https://www. gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/ 397726/Cystic_Fibrosis_Lab_Guide_February_2014_v1.0_12_. pdf.
    • Hirst, C., & Owusu-Ofori, S. (2014). Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing pneumococcal infection in children with sickle cell disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11, CD003427. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003427.pub3.
    • Kai, J., Ulph, F., Cullinan, T., & Qureshi, N. (2009). Communication of carrier status information following universal newborn screening for sickle cell disorders and cystic fibrosis: qualitative study of experience and practice. Health Technology Assessment, 13(57), 1-82 iii. doi:10.3310/hta13570.
    • Kladny, B., Williams, A., Gupta, A., Gettig, E. A., & Krishnamurti, L. (2011). Genetic counseling following the detection of hemoglobinopathy trait on the newborn screen is well received, improves knowledge, and relieves anxiety. Genetics in Medicine, 13(7), 658-661. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e31821435f7.
    • Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. New York: Macmillan.
    • Marsh, V. M., Kamuya, D. M., & Molyneux, S. S. (2011). 'All her children are born that way': gendered experiences of stigma in families affected by sickle cell disorder in rural Kenya. Ethnicity and Health, 16(4-5), 343-359. doi:10.1080/13557858.2010.541903.
    • Morgan, T. (2014). Data Collection and Performance Analysis Report Newborn Blood Spot Screening in the UK 2012-13. Retrieved from London:
    • Nicholls, S. G., & Southern, K. W. (2012). Informed choice for newborn blood spot screening in the United Kingdom: a survey of parental perceptions. Pediatrics, 130(6), e1527-e1533. doi:10.1542/peds. 2012-1479.
    • Nicholls, S. G., & Southern, K. W. (2014). Considering consent: a structural equation modelling analysis of factors influencing decisional quality when accepting newborn screening. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, 37(2), 197-205. doi:10.1007/s10545-013- 9651-x.
    • Parker, H., Qureshi, N., Ulph, F., & Kai, J. (2007). Imparting carrier status results detected by universal newborn screening for sickle cell and cystic fibrosis in England: a qualitative study of current practice and policy challenges. BMC Health Services Research, 7, 203. doi:10. 1186/1472-6963-7-203.
    • Salm, A., Yetter, E., & Tluczek, A. (2012). Informing parents about positive newborn screening results: parents' recommendations. Journal of Child Health Care, 16(4), 367-381.
    • Tluczek, A., Zaleski, C., Stachiw-Hietpas, D., Modaff, P., Adamski, C. R., Nelson, M. R., et al. (2011). A tailored approach to familycentered genetic counseling for cystic fibrosis newborn screening: the wisconsin model. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 20(2), 115- 128. doi:10.1007/s10897-010-9332-y.
    • UK Newborn Screening Programme Centre. (2012). Health Professional Handbook: A guide to newborn blood spot screening for healthcare professionals. Retrieved from London.
    • Ulph, F., Cullinan, T., Qureshi, N., & Kai, J. (2014). Informing children of their newborn screening carrier result for sickle cell or cystic fibrosis: qualitative study of parents' intentions, views and support needs. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(3), 409-420. doi:10.1007/ s10897-013-9675-2.
    • Ulph, F., Cullinan, T., Qureshi, N., & Kai, J. (2015). Parents' responses to receiving sickle cell or cystic fibrosis carrier results for their child following newborn screening. European Journal of Human Genetics, 23(4), 459-465. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.126.
    • Williams, R. A., Dheensa, S., & Metcalfe, A. (2011). Men's involvement in antenatal screening: a qualitative pilot study using e-mail. Midwifery, 27(6), 861-866. doi:10.1016/j. midw.2010.09.004.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article