LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Harrison, N.; Waller, R. (2016)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Practitioners are being placed under increasing pressure to evaluate the success of their outreach activities, both by government and by their own universities. Based in a reductionist doctrine of ‘evidence-based practice’, there is a desire to demonstrate the effectiveness and value-for-money across activities that now account for around £175 million per year across England. This article examines some of the difficulties in evaluating the complex social world of outreach and suggests a ‘small steps’ approach to overcome some of these. This uses the idea of a transformative ‘theory of change’ as a framework for understanding the particular contribution made by discrete activities within a wider portfolio, providing a more reliable form of inference than attempts to ‘prove’ impact over longer timeframes.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Bickman, L. and S. Reich. 2009. Randomized controlled trials: a gold standard with feet of clay? In S. Donaldson, C. Christie and M. Mark (eds.) What counts as credible evidence in applied research and evaluation practice? Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    • Boag-Munroe, G. and M. Evangelou. 2012. From hard to reach to how to reach: A systematic review of the literature on hard-to-reach families. Research Papers in Education 27(2): 209- 239.
    • Bowman, N. and T. Seifert. 2011. Can college students accurately assess what affects their learning and development? Journal of College Student Development 52(3): 270-290.
    • Crawford, C. 2014. The link between secondary school characteristics and university participation and outcomes. London: DFE.
    • Croll, P. and Attwood, G. 2013. Participation in higher education: aspirations, attainment and social background. British Journal of Educational Studies 61(2): 187-202.
    • Department for Business, Innovation and Skills [BIS]. 2014. National strategy for access and student success in higher education. London: BIS.
    • Department for Business, Innovation and Skills [BIS]. 2016. Success as a knowledge economy: teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. London: BIS.
    • Department for Education and Employment. 2000. The Excellence Challenge. London: DFEE.
    • Donaldson, S., Christie, C. and Mark, M. (eds.) 2009. What counts as credible evidence in applied research and evaluation practice? Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    • Doyle, M. and M. Griffin. 2012. Raised aspirations and attainment? A review of the impact of Aimhigher (2004-2011) on widening participation in higher education in England. London Review of Education 10(1): 75-88.
    • Fuller, C. 2014. Social capital and the role of trust in aspirations for higher education. Educational Review, 66(2): 131-147.
    • Gorard, S., N. Adnett, H. May, K. Slack, E. Smith and L. Thomas. 2006. Overcoming the barriers to higher education. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham.
    • Gorard, S. and B.H. See. 2013. Overcoming disadvantage in education. Abingdon: Routledge.
    • Hoare, T. and R. Mann. 2012. The impact of the Sutton Trust's Summer Schools on subsequent higher education participation. London: Sutton Trust.
    • Kahneman, D. 2003. Maps of bounded rationality: psychology of behavioural economics. American Economic Review 93(5): 1449-1475.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article