LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Li, Z. (2004)
Publisher: Institute of Navigation
Languages: English
Types: Other
Subjects: Q1, GB, TA

Atmospheric water vapor is a crucial element in weather, climate and hydrology. With the recent advance in Global Positioning System (GPS) Meteorology, ground-based GPS has become an operational tool that can measure precipitable water vapor (PWV) with high accuracy (1~1.5mm) during all-weathers, and with high temporal resolution (e.g. 5 minutes) at low cost. But the spatial coverage of GPS receivers is limited, and restricts its applications. At present, two NASA Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) can provide global coverage 2D water vapor field with a spatial resolution of 1 km × 1 km (at nadir) every 2 days, and at many latitudes can provide water vapor fields every 90 minutes, 4 times a day. The disadvantages of MODIS water vapor products are: 1). A systematic uncertainty of 5-10% is expected [Gao et al., 2003; Li et al., 2003]; 2). Since the MODIS water vapor retrieval relies on observations of water vapor attenuation of near Infrared (IR) solar radiation reflected by surfaces and clouds, it is sensitive to the presence of clouds. The frequency and the percentage of cloud free conditions at mid-latitudes is only 15-30% on average [Li et al., 2004]. Therefore, in order to extract a water vapor field above the Earth’s surface, an attempt needs to be made to fill in the cloudy pixels.

\ud \ud

In this paper, an inter-comparison between MODIS (collection 4) and GPS PWV products was performed in the region of the Southern California Integrated GPS Network (SCIGN). It is shown that MODIS appeared to overestimate PWV against GPS with a scale factor of 1.05 and a zero-offset of –0.7 mm. Taking into account the small standard deviation of the linear fit model, a GPS-derived correction linear fit model was proposed to calibrate MODIS PWV products, and a better agreement was achieved. In order to produce regional 1 km × 1 km water vapor fields, an integration approach was proposed: Firstly, MODIS near IR water vapor was calibrated using GPS data; secondly, an improved inverse distance weighted interpolation method (IIDW) was applied to fill in the cloudy pixels; thirdly, the densified water vapor field was validated using GPS data. It is shown that the integration approach was promising. After correction, MODIS and GPS PWV agreed to within 1.6 mm in terms of standard deviations using appropriate extent and power parameters of IIDW, and the coverage of water vapor fields increased by up to 21.6%.\ud In addition, for the first time, spatial structure functions were derived from MODIS near IR water vapor, and large water vapor variations were observed from time to time.

  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • [1]. Bevis, M., S. Businger, T.A. Herring, C. Rocken, R.A. Anthes, and R. H. Ware, GPS Meteorology: Remote Sensing of Atmospheric Water Vapor Using the Global Positioning System, Jounrnal of Geophysical Research, 97 (D14), 15,787-15,801, 1992.
    • [2]. Emardson, T.R., M. Simons, and F.H. Webb, Neutral atmospheric delay in interferometric synthetic aperture radar applications: statistical description and mitigation, Journal of Geophysical Research, 108 (B5), 2231,doi:10.1029/2002JB001781, 2003.
    • [3]. Gao, B.C., and Y.J. Kaufman, Water vapor retrievals using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) near-infrared channels, Journal of Geophysical Research, 108 (D13), 4389, doi:10.1029/2002JD003023, 2003.
    • [4]. Li, Z., J.-P. Muller, and P. Cross, Comparison of precipitable water vapor derived from radiosonde, GPS, and Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer measurements, Journal of Geophysical Research, 108 (D20), 4651, doi:10.1029/2003JD003372, 2003.
    • [5]. Li, Z., J.-P. Muller, P. Cross, P. Albert, J. Fischer, and R. Bennartz, Assessment of the potential of MERIS Near IR Water Vapour Products to Correct ASAR Interferometric Measurements, Submitted to International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2004.
    • [6]. Li, Z., J.-P. Muller, P. Cross, and E. J. Fielding, InSAR atmospheric correction: II. GPS, MODIS and InSAR integration, Submitted to Geophysical Research Letters, 2004.
    • [7]. Niell, A.E., A.J. Coster, F.S. Solheim, V.B. Mendes, P.C. Toor, R.B. Langley and C.A. Upham, Comparison of measurements of Atmospheric Wet Delay by Radiosonde, Water Vapor Radiometer, GPS, and VLBI, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 18, 830-850, 2001.
    • [8]. Shepard, D., A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data, Proc. 23rd National Conference ACM, ACM, 517-524, 1968.
    • [9]. Tatarskii, V.I., The effects of the turbulent atmosphere on wave propagation, 472 pp., Israel Program for Scientific Translations Ltd., 1971.
    • [10]. Treuhaft, R.N., and G.E. Lanyi, The Effect of the Dynamic Wet Troposphere on Radio Interferometric Measurements, Radio Science, 22, 251-265, 1987.
    • [11]. Webley, P.W., R.M. Bingley, A.H. Dodson, G.
    • Wadge, S.J. Waugh, and I.N. James, Atmospheric water vapour correction to InSAR surface motion measurements on mountains: results from a dense GPS network on Mount Etna, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 27 (4-5), 363-370, 2002.
    • [12]. Williams, S., Y. Bock, and P. Fang, Integrated satellite interferometry: Troposphere Noise, GPS estimates, and implications for synthetic aperture radar products.” Journal of Geophysical Research, 103(B11), 27051-27067, 1998.
    • [13]. Zumberge, J.F., M.B. Heflin, D.C. Jefferson, and M.M. Watkins, Precise Point Positioning for the Efficient and Roubust Analysis of GPS Data from Large Networks, Journal of Geophysical Research, 102 (B3), 5005-5017, 1997.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article