OpenAIRE is about to release its new face with lots of new content and services.
During September, you may notice downtime in services, while some functionalities (e.g. user registration, login, validation, claiming) will be temporarily disabled.
We apologize for the inconvenience, please stay tuned!
For further information please contact helpdesk[at]

fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Elson, Luke (2016)
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Sergio Tenenbaum and Diana Raffman contend that ‘vague projects’ motivate radical revisions to orthodox, utility-maximising rational choice theory. Their argument cannot succeed if such projects merely ground instances of the paradox of the sorites, or heap. Tenenbaum and Raffman are not blind to this, and argue that Warren Quinn’s Puzzle of the Self-Torturer does not rest on the sorites. I argue that their argument both fails to generalise to most vague projects, and is ineffective in the case of the Self-Torturer itself.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Sergio Tenenbaum and Diana Raffman, “Vague Projects and the Puzzle of the SelfTorturer,” Ethics 123 ð2012Þ: 86-112.
    • 2. See Warren S. Quinn, “The Puzzle of the Self-Torturer,” Philosophical Studies 59 ð1990Þ: 79-90, esp. 79, for the canonical presentation.
    • 3. Ibid., 79.
    • 12. See, e.g., Adam Elga, “Subjective Probabilities Should Be Sharp,” Philosophers' Imprint 10 ð2010Þ: 1-11, 4.
    • 19. See, e.g., Tenenbaum and Raffman, “Vague Projects and the Puzzle of the SelfTorturer,” 94.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article

Cookies make it easier for us to provide you with our services. With the usage of our services you permit us to use cookies.
More information Ok