Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Williams, Denitza; Davies, Myfanwy; Fiander, Alison Nina; Farewell, Daniel; Hillier, Sharon; Brain, Katherine Emma (2017)
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Journal: Health Expectations : An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: Original Research Paper, self‐sampling, RG, attitudes, human papillomavirus, cervical screening, intentions, Original Research Papers, HPV, R1
Background: Testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) is being incorporated into the cervical\ud screening programme, with the probable future introduction of HPV as a primary test\ud and a possibility of HPV self-sampling.\ud In anticipation of this development, we sought to\ud inform future policy and practice by identifying potential barriers to HPV self-sampling.\ud Methods: A cross-sectional\ud survey of 194 women aged 20-64\ud years was conducted.\ud Logistic regression analysis was used to identify determinants of self-sampling\ud intentions.\ud A purposive subsample of 19 women who reported low self-sampling\ud intentions\ud were interviewed. Interviews were framework-analysed.\ud Results: Most survey participants (N=133, 69.3%) intended to HPV self-sample.\ud Lower\ud intention was associated with lower self-efficacy\ud (OR=24.96, P≤.001), lower education\ud (OR=6.06, P≤.05) and lower perceived importance of HPV as a cause of cervical\ud cancer (OR=2.33, P≤.05). Interviews revealed personal and system-related\ud barriers.\ud Personal barriers included a lack of knowledge about HPV self-sampling,\ud women’s low\ud confidence in their ability to self-sample\ud correctly and low confidence in the subsequent\ud results. System-related\ud factors included a lack of confidence in the rationale for\ud modifying the current cervical screening programme, and concerns about sample\ud contamination\ud and identity theft.\ud Conclusions: Insights gained from this research can be used to guide further enquiry\ud into the possibility of HPV self-sampling\ud and to help inform future policy and practice.\ud Personal and system-related\ud barriers including low confidence in the reasons for\ud changing current cervical screening provision need to be addressed, should HPV self-sampling\ud be incorporated into the cervical screening programme.