LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Crameri, Kathryn (2016)
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
Secession is normally viewed as legitimate only as a last resort for oppressed peoples, but contemporary independence movements in Europe are working hard to shift perceptions of the legitimacy of secession as a democratic phenomenon. In this context, the recent growth of the independence movement in Catalonia has given rise to a direct confrontation between two opposing conceptions of the legitimacy of secession in democratic nation-states. On one hand, pro-referendum Catalans claim that a vote on the matter would be entirely consistent with the basic principles of democracy. On the other, the Spanish government rests its denial of a referendum on the legal authority of the Spanish Constitution, which states that Spain must remain united. This article traces the two competing discourses of democratic and legal legitimacy (what we might call the ‘right to decide’ versus the ‘duty to abide’) through an examination of the rhetoric of key political actors. It concludes that the Catalan government’s attempt to prove that Catalonia could constitute a politically legitimate independent state, and should therefore be allowed to ask its residents whether they wish it to do so, is particularly significant as a challenge to generally-accepted ‘remedial right’ theories of secession.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 8TV (2015) 'Els catalans prefereixen un referèndum per ratificar la independència que una declaració unilateral si el 27-S hi ha majoria independentista', 8TV, 5 February. Available from: http://www.8tv.cat/8aldia/videos/els-catalansprefereixen-un-referendum-per-ratificar-que-una-declaracio-unilateral-si-el-27- s-hi-ha-majoria-independentista/ [Accessed 20 Feburary 2015].
    • Anon. (2014) 'La ANC entrega 750.000 firmas al Parlament en favor de una declaración unilateral de independencia', La Vanguardia, 15 September. Available from: http://www.lavanguardia.com/politica/20140915/54415983627/anc-entrega-750- 000-firmas-parlament-declaracion-unilateral-independencia.html [Accessed 20 February 2015].
    • Arias Maldonado, M. (2014) 'Legitimidad y legalidad en Cataluña', El Diario, 27 September. Available from: http://www.eldiario.es/agendapublica/reformaconstitucional/Legitimidad-legalidad-Cataluna_0_307619574.html [Accessed 12 December 2014].
    • Balfour, S. and Quiroga, A. (2007) The Reinvention of Spain: Nation and Identity since Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Barnard, F.M. (2001) Democratic Legitimacy: Plural Values and Political Power. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
    • Bel, Germà (2013) Anatomia d'un desengany. Barcelona: Destino.
    • Bosch, A. (2013) 'Judo in Madrid', in L. Castro (ed.) What's Up with Catalonia? Ashfield, MA: Catalonia Press.
    • Brubaker, Rogers (2004) Ethnicity without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • Buchanan, A. (1998) 'The International Institutional Dimension of Secession', in P.B. Lehning (ed.), Theories of Secession. London: Routledge.
    • --- (2002) 'Political Legitimacy and Democracy', Ethics, 12, 689-719.
    • --- (2003) Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article