LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Brian, D.J.,; Cruickshank, A. (2017)
Publisher: Sage Publishing
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: C800, C810
This article reviews Police Research Series Paper 15, The Presentation of Police Evidence in Court (Stockdale and Gresham, 1995), and the role of police officers giving testimony in court. Specifically, consideration is given to the recommendations made and subsequent developments, or lack thereof, in police literature and practice. Police officers are well prepared to manage the pre-trial investigation but still receive little preparation, or guidance from researchers, for performing as a witness at court. Key factors in effectively presenting evidence are reviewed and directions outlined for building knowledge on preparing police officers to perform in court whilst upholding obligations to victims and the legal standard of public interest.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Association of Chief Police Officers, National Policing improvement Agency, (2012). Practice Advice on Core Investigative Doctrine, 2nd Ed.
    • Barrett, C. and Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. (2013). The Victim as a Means to an End: Detective Decision Making in a Simulated Investigation of Attempted Rape. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. 10: pp.200-218.
    • Boccacini, M.T. Gordon, T, and Brodsky, S. (2005). Witness Preparation Training with Real and Simulated Criminal Defendants. Behavioural Science and the Law, 23, pp. 659-687 Bothwell, R. K, and Jalil, M. (1992). The Credibility of Nervous Witnesses. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality, 7, pp.581-586.
    • Brodsky, S. L., Neal, T. M. S., Cramer, R. J., and Ziemke, M. H. (2009). Credibility in the Courtroom: How likeable should an expert witness be? Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 37, 525-5 Brodsky, S. L., Griffin, M. P., and Cramer, R. J. (2010). The witness Credibility Scale: An Outcome Measure for Expert Witness Research. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 28, pp.892-907.
    • Cole, S. and Dioso-Villa, R. (2009). Investigating the 'CSI Effect' Effect: Media and Litigation Crisis in Criminal Law. Stanford Law Review. 61 (6), pp.1335-1374.
    • Cramer, R. J., Brodsky, S. L., and DeCoster, J. (2009). Expert witness confidence and juror personality: Their impact on credibility and persuasion in the courtroom. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 37, pp.63-74.
    • Cramer, R.J, Neal, T, M, S, DeCoster, J, and Brodsky, S, L. (2010) Witness self-Efficacy: Development and Validation of the Construct. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 28, pp. 784- 800.
    • Cramer, R. J., DeCoster, J., Harris, P. B., Fletcher, L. M., and Brodsky, S. L. (2011). A Confidence-Credibility Model of Expert Witness Persuasion: Mediating Effects and Implications For Trial Consultation. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 63, pp.129-137.
    • Cramer, R. J., DeCoster, J., Neal, T. M. S., and Brodsky, S. L. (2013). The observed Witness Efficacy Scale: A measure of effective testimony skills. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, pp.1696-1703.
    • Cramer, R.J., Parrott, CT, Gardner, BO, Stroud, CH, Boccaccini, MT, and Griffin, MP. (2014). An Exploratory Study of Meta-Factors of Expert Witness Persuasion. Journal of Individual Differences. 35(1) c, pp.1-11.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article