Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Parnell, SR; Gottwald, TR; Riley, T; van den Bosch, F
Publisher: Ecological Society of America
Languages: English
Types: Article
Invasive plant pathogens are increasing with international trade and travel, with damaging environmental and economic consequences. Recent examples include tree diseases such as sudden oak death in the Western United States and ash dieback in Europe. To control an invading pathogen it is crucial that newly infected sites are quickly detected so that measures can be implemented to control the epidemic. However, since sampling resources are often limited, not all locations can be inspected and locations must be prioritized for surveying. Existing approaches to achieve this are often species specific and rely on detailed data collection and parameterization, which is difficult, especially when new arrivals are unanticipated. Consequently regulatory sampling responses are often ad hoc and developed without due consideration of epidemiology, leading to the suboptimal deployment of expensive sampling resources. We introduce a flexible risk-based sampling method that is pathogen generic and enables available information to be utilized to develop epidemiologically informed sampling programs for virtually any biologically relevant plant pathogen. By targeting risk we aim to inform sampling schemes that identify high-impact locations that can be subsequently treated in order to reduce inoculum in the landscape. This “damage limitation” is often the initial management objective following the first discovery of a new invader. Risk at each location is determined by the product of the basic reproductive number (R0), as a measure of local epidemic size, and the probability of infection. We illustrate how the risk estimates can be used to prioritize a survey by weighting a random sample so that the highest-risk locations have the highest probability of selection. We demonstrate and test the method using a high-quality spatially and temporally resolved data set on Huanglongbing disease (HLB) in Florida, USA. We show that even when available epidemiological information is relatively minimal, the method has strong predictive value and can result in highly effective targeted surveying plans.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1Rothamsted Research, Department of Computational and Systems Biology, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ United Kingdom 2U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Ft. Pierce, Florida 34945 USA 3U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Orlando, Florida 32827 USA Manuscript received 16 April 2013; revised 23 August 2013; accepted 5 September 2013. Corresponding Editor: R. A.
    • Hufbauer. 4 E-mail:
    • Anonymous. 2012b. Commercial citrus inventory preliminary report. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. www. nass.usda.gov/Statistics/Florida/ublications/Citrus/citcci.htm Austin, M. 2007. Species distribution models and ecological theory: a critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecological Modelling 200:1-19.
    • Baric, L., M. Zˇ upanic, M. Pernek, and D. Diminic. 2012. First records of Chalara fraxinea in Croatia-a new agent of ash dieback (Fraxinus spp.). Journal of Forestry Society of Croatia 136:461-469.
    • Bassanezi, R. B., and R. C. Bassanezi. 2008. An approach to model the impact of Huanglongbing on citrus yield. Pages 301-304 in Proceedings of the International Research Conference on Huanglongbing (Orlando, Florida). Plant Management Network, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
    • Baxter, P. W. J., and H. P. Possingham. 2011. Optimizing search strategies for invasive pests: learn before you leap. Journal of Applied Ecology 48:86-95.
    • Bengtsson, V., A. Stenstrom, and C. Finsberg. 2013. The impact of ash dieback on veteran and pollarded trees in Sweden. Quarterly Journal of Forestry 107:27-33.
    • Bogich, T. L., A. M. Liebhold, and K. Shea. 2008. To sample or eradicate? A cost minimization model for monitoring and managing an invasive species. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:1134-1142.
    • Brasier, C. M. 2008. The biosecurity threat to the UK and global environment from international trade in plants. Plant Pathology 57:792-808.
    • Brasier, C. M., S. Denman, A. Brown, and J. Webber. 2004. Sudden oak death (Phytophthora Ramorum) discovered on trees in Europe. Mycological Research 108:1108-1110.
    • Cacho, O. J., D. Spring, S. Hester, and R. Mac Nally. 2010. Allocating surveillance effort in the management of invasive species: A spatially-explicit model. Environmental Modelling and Software 25:444-454.
    • Chandelier, A., N. Delhaye, and M. Helson. 2011. First report of the ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus (Anamorph Chalara fraxinea) on Fraxinus excelsior in Belgium. Plant Disease 95:220.
    • Crall, A., C. Jarnevich, B. Panke, N. Young, M. Renz, and J. Morisette. 2013. Using habitat suitability models to target invasive plant species surveys. Ecological Applications 23:60-72.
    • Demon, I., N. J. Cunniffe, B. P. Marchant, C. A. Gilligan, and F. van den Bosch. 2011. Spatial sampling to detect an invasive pathogen outside of an eradication zone. Phytopathology 101:725-731.
    • Diekmann, O., J. A. P. Heesterbeek, and J. A. J. Metz. 1990. On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Mathematical Biology 28:365-382.
    • Emry, D. J., H. M. Alexander, and M. K. Tourtellot. 2011. Modelling the local spread of invasive plants: importance of including spatial distribution and detectability in management plans. Journal of Applied Ecology 48:1391-1400.
    • Epanchin-Niell, R. S., R. G. Haight, L. Berec, J. M. Kean, and A. M. Liebhold. 2012. Optimal surveillance and eradication of invasive species in heterogeneous landscapes. Ecology Letters 15:803-812.
    • Ferguson, N., C. Donnelly, and R. Anderson. 2001. Transmission intensity and impact of control policies on the foot and mouth epidemic in Great Britain. Nature 413:542-548.
    • Giljohann, K. M., C. E. Hauser, N. S. G. Williams, and J. L. Moore. 2011. Optimizing invasive species control across space: willow invasion management in the Australian Alps. Journal of Applied Ecology 48:1286-1294.
    • Gottwald, T. R. 2010. Current epidemiological understanding of citrus Huanglongbing. Annual Review of Phytopathology 48:119-139.
    • Gottwald, T. R., G. Hughes, J. H. Graham, X. Sun, and T. Riley. 2001. The citrus canker epidemic in Florida: the scientific basis of regulatory eradication policy for an invasive species. Phytopathology 91:30-34.
    • Gottwald, T. R., and M. Irey. 2007. Post-hurricane analysis of citrus canker II: predictive model estimation of disease spread and area potentially impacted by various eradication protocols following catastrophic weather events. Plant Health Progress. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHP-2007-0405- 01-RS
    • Guillera-Arroita, G., M. S. Ridout, and B. J. T. Morgan. 2010. Design of occupancy studies with imperfect detection. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1:131-139.
    • Guisan, A., and N. E. Zimmermann. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135:147-186.
    • Hartemink, N. A., B. V. Purse, R. Meiswinkel, H. E. Brown, A. de Koeijer, A. R. Elbers, G. J. Boender, D. J. Rogers, and J. A. Heesterbeek. 2009. Mapping the basic reproduction number (R0) for vector-borne diseases: a case study on bluetongue virus. Epidemics 1:153-161.
    • Hauser, C. E., and M. A. McCarthy. 2009. Streamlining ''search and destroy'': cost-effective surveillance for invasive species management. Ecology Letters 12:683-692.
    • Homans, F., and T. Horie. 2011. Optimal detection strategies for an established invasive pest. Ecological Economics 70:1129-1138.
    • Horie, T., R. G. Haight, F. Homans, and R. C. Venette. 2013. Optimal strategies for the surveillance and control of forest pathogens: a case study with oak wilt. Ecological Economics 86:78-85.
    • Hughes, G., T. R. Gottwald, and K. Yamamura. 2002. Survey methods for assessment of Citrus tristeza virus incidence in urban citrus populations. Plant Disease 86:367-372.
    • Husson, C., B. Scala, O. Cael, P. Frey, N. Feau, R. Ioos, and B. Marcais. 2011. Chalara fraxinea is an invasive pathogen in France. European Journal of Plant Pathology 130:311-324.
    • Inglis, G. J., H. Hurren, J. Oldman, and R. Haskew. 2006. Using habitat suitability index and particle dispersion models for early detection of marine invaders. Ecological Applications 16:1377-1390.
    • Jones, D. R., and R. H. A. Baker. 2007. Introductions of nonnative plant pathogens into Great Britain, 1970-2004. Plant Pathology 56:891-910.
    • Keeling, M. J., and P. Rohani. 2008. Modelling infectious diseases in humans and animals. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
    • Kirkpatrick, S., C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi. 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671-680.
    • Kowalski, T. 2009. Expanse of Chalara fraxinea fungus in terms of ash dieback in Poland. Sylwan 153:668-674.
    • Mackenzie, D. I., and J. A. Royle. 2005. Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:1105-1114.
    • Madden, L. V., and M. Wheelis. 2003. The threat of plant pathogens as weapons against U.S. crops. Annual Review of Phytopathology 41:155-176.
    • McCarthy, M. A., C. J. Thompson, C. Hauser, M. A. Burgman, H. P. Possingham, M. L. Moir, T. Tiensin, and M. Gilbert. 2010. Resource allocation for efficient environmental management. Ecology Letters 13:1280-1289.
    • Mehta, S. V., R. G. Haight, F. R. Homans, S. Polasky, and R. C. Venette. 2007. Optimal detection and control strategies for invasive species management. Ecological Economics 61:237-245.
    • Morgan, B. 1995. Elements of simulation. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
    • National Research Council. 2002. Predicting invasions of nonindigenous plants and plant pests. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
    • Ndeffo Mbah, M. L., and C. A. Gilligan. 2010. Balancing detection and eradication for control of epidemics: sudden oak death in mixed-species stands. PLoS ONE 5:e12317.
    • Ovaskainen, O., and I. Hanski. 2001. Spatially structured metapopulation models: global and local assessment of metapopulation capacity. Theoretical Population Biology 60:281-302.
    • Parnell, S., T. R. Gottwald, W. R. Gilks, and F. van den Bosch. 2012. Estimating the incidence of an epidemic when it is first discovered and the design of early detection monitoring. Journal of Theoretical Biology 305:30-36.
    • Parnell, S., T. R. Gottwald, M. S. Irey, W. Luo, and F. van den Bosch. 2011. A stochastic optimization method to estimate the spatial distribution of a pathogen from a sample. Phytopathology 101:1184-1190.
    • Press, W., S. Teukolsky, W. Vetterling, and B. Flannery. 1992. Numerical recipes in C. The art of scientific computing. Second edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
    • Rizzo, D. M., and M. Garbelotto. 2003. Sudden oak death: endangering California and Oregon forest ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:197-204.
    • Royle, J. A., J. D. Nichols, and M. K e´ry. 2005. Modelling occurrence and abundance of species when detection is imperfect. Oikos 110:353-359.
    • Snyman, J. A. 2005. Practical mathematical optimization: an introduction to basic optimization theory and classical and new gradient-based algorithms. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
    • Timmermann, V., I. Borja, A. M. Hietala, T. Kirisits, and H. Solheim. 2011. Ash dieback: pathogen spread and diurnal patterns of ascospore dispersal, with special emphasis on Norway. EPPO Bulletin 41:14-20.
    • Tyre, A. J., B. Tenhumberg, S. A. Field, D. Niejalke, K. Parris, and H. P. Possingham. 2003. Improving precision and reducing bias in biological surveys: estimating false-negative error rates. Ecological Applications 13:1790-1801.
    • V a´clavik, T., and R. K. Meentemeyer. 2009. Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): Are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions? Ecological Modelling 220:3248-3258.
    • V a´clavik, T., and R. K. Meentemeyer. 2012. Equilibrium or not? Modelling potential distribution of invasive species in different stages of invasion. Diversity and Distributions 18:73-83.
    • van den Bosch, F., N. McRoberts, F. van den Berg, and L. V. Madden. 2008. The basic reproduction number of plant pathogens: matrix approaches to complex dynamics. Phytopathology 98:239-249.
    • van den Bosch, F., J. Metz, and J. Zadoks. 1999. Pandemics of focal plant disease, a model. Phytopathology 89:495-505.
    • Wallinga, J., and M. Lipsitch. 2007. How generation intervals shape the relationship between growth rates and reproductive numbers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274:599-604.
    • Wallinga, J., M. van Boven, and M. Lipsitch. 2010. Optimizing infectious disease interventions during an emerging epidemic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107:923-928.
    • Williams, J. N., C. W. Seo, J. Thorne, J. K. Nelson, S. Erwin, J. M. O'Brien, and M. W. Schwartz. 2009. Using species distribution models to predict new occurrences for rare plants. Diversity and Distributions 15:565-576.
    • Wintle, B. A., T. V. Walshe, K. M. Parris, and M. A. McCarthy. 2012. Designing occupancy surveys and interpreting non-detection when observations are imperfect. Diversity and Distributions 18:417-424.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article