LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Karavas, Evdokia
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: LB1603
The study set out to investigate the degree of implementation of a communicative learner-centred\ud curriculum and textbooks in the Greek secondaiy school English language classroom. The aims of the\ud research were: a) to investigate the Greek English language teachers' actual teaching practices and the\ud degree to which they are in accordance with the philosophy and principles of the curriculum, and b) to\ud examine the extent to which certain factors (i.e. teachers' understanding of, and attitudes towards, the\ud communicative learner centred approach, teachers' non- involvement in the innovation process, teachers'\ud opinions of the textbooks, lack of systematic teacher training) may be associated with the teachers'\ud classroom behaviour.\ud For the first part of the research, classroom observations of 14 Greek English language teachers,\ud working in schools within and around the Athens area, were carried out. An observation scheme was\ud developed focusing on the teachers' implementation of activities. The aim of the scheme is to describe the\ud roles the teachers adopt in the classroom. 'reacher roles were also investigated through an analysis of the\ud teachers' linguistic behaviour. Transcripts of the 14 observed lessons were analysed in terms of teachers'\ud error correcting practices (amount and types of learner errors corrected by teachers and the error\ud treatments used) and their questioning practices (amount and types of questions asked by the teachers). For\ud this latter focus a question typology derived from the data was developed.\ud Teachers' attitudes towards, and understanding of, the communicative learner-centred approach were\ud investigated via a Likert type attitude scale developed for the purposes of this study and a questionnaire.\ud The questionnaire consisted of 28 closed-type items eliciting teachers' opinions of the textbooks and the\ud teachers' guides, and reports of their teaching practices. The questionnaire and attitude scale was\ud completed by an additional 87 teachers working in public secondary schools within and around the Athens\ud area. Finally, as a means of achieving methodological triangulation, interviews with the observed teachers\ud were carried out. The interviews focused on the teachers' knowledge of, and attitudes towards, the\ud approach they have been asked to use.\ud The thesis is divided into 10 chapters. Chapter 1 sets the context of the study, its main objectives and\ud research questions. Chapters 2 and 3 contain reviews of the literature relevant to the communicative\ud approach and the implementation of curriculum innovations. The research questions, model of the study\ud and a detailed account of the development of the research instruments employed in the study are provided\ud in chapter 4. Chapters 5 to 9 deal with the implementation of the research instruments and the results of the\ud data analysis. More specifically, chapter 5 deals with the analysis and findings of the teachers' error\ud correcting practices, and chapter 6 with the findings of teachers' questioning practices . The results of the\ud observation scheme analysis are dealt with in chapter 7. Chapter 8 focuses on the results of the attitude\ud scale and questionnaire completed by the 14 teachers and chapter 9 on the results of the interviews. A\ud summary of the study's main results, a critique of the various research methods employed in the study, as\ud well as implications of the study's findings for practice are presented in chapter 10.\ud The findings of the classroom observations revealed a disparity between the principles of the\ud curnculum and textbooks and their implementation in the classroom. The teachers tended to front the\ud classroom and perform a restricted range of roles, overwhelmingly favouring the roles of transmitter,\ud controller of students' language and evaluator. The analysis of teachers' linguistic behaviour corroborated\ud these findings. The results of the attitude scale, questionnaire and interviews revealed that teachers, due to\ud their lack of training, had a very limited understanding of the main principles of the approach they had been\ud asked to implement. The teachers tended to translate innovatoiy concepts to conform to their existing\ud theories of language and language teaching/learning.\ud The study has aimed to contribute to two areas where language teaching research is largely lacking: a)\ud classroom implementation of a communicative approach in a foreign language teaching context and b) the\ud investigation of language teachers' attitudes and their importance in understanding language teachers'\ud classroom behaviour. Based on the findings of the study, recommendations for would-be curriculum\ud developers working in contexts similar to the Greek one are provided in the concluding chapter of the\ud thesis.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Barnes 1). (1969), "Language in the secondary classroom" in Barnes D., Brilton J. & Rosen IL (eds.), Language, the Learner and the School. Harmondsworth: Penguin
    • Bellack A., Kliebard II.M., Ilyman R.T. & Smith F.L.Jr. (1966), The Language of the Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press
    • Bentler P.M. & Speckart G. (1981), "Attitudes 'cause' behaviours: A structural equation analysis". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42/2: 226-238
    • Beretta A. (1989), "Attention to form or meaning? Error treatment in the Bangalore Project". TESOL Quarterly 23/2: 283-303
    • Beretta A. (1990), "Implementation of the Bangalore Project". Applied Linguistics 11/4: 32 1-337.
    • Biddle B.J. (1969), "Teacher roles" in Ebel R.L. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Educational Research. Fourth Edition, London: Collier - Macmillan
    • Biddle B., Rosencranz A.IL, Thomas Li. & i'wyman P.J. (1966), "Shared inaccuracies in the role of the teacher" in Biddle B.J. & Thomas E.J. (eds.), Role Theory: Concepts and Research. New York: John Wiley & Sons
    • Bloom 13.S., Engethart M.D., Furst E.J., Hill W.H. & Krathwohl I).R. (1956), Taxomony of Educational Objectives. Hanbook 1: Cognitive l)omain. London: Longman
    • Box A.R. & Peponi E. (1992), "The communicative approach to language teaching and Greek private language schools". University of East Anglia Papers in Linguistics 33: 1-26
    • Breen M. (1983), Open Discussion on Andrews S. "Communicative language teaching-some implications for teacher education" in Johnson K. & Porter I). (eds.), Perspectives in Communicative Language Teaching. London: Academic Press
    • Breen M.P. (1987a), "Contemporary paradigms in syllabus design". Language Teaching 20/2,3: 81-91, 157-172
    • Breen M. (198Th), "Learner coniribution to task design" in Candlin C. & Murphy D. (eds.), Language Learning Tasks. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall
    • Breen M.P. (1991) "Understanding the language teacher" in Phillipson R., Kellerman E., Selinker L, Sharwood Smith M. & Swain M. (eds.), Foreign/Second Language Pedagogy Research. Clevedon, Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters
    • Breen M.P. & Candlin C.N. (1980), "The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching ". Applied Linguistics 1/2: 89-112
    • Breen M.P. & Candlin C. (1988), "The roles of the teacher, the learners and the content within a communicative methodology" in Richard - Amato P.A. (eu), Making it Happen: Interaction in the Second Language Classroom. From Theory to Practice. New York, London: Longman
    • Breen M.P., Candlin C., 1)am L. & Gabrielsen G. (1989), "The evolution of a teacher training programme" in Johnson R.K. (ed.), The Second Language Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    • l3rindlcy G. & hood S. (1990), "Curriculum innovation in adult ESL" in Brindley G. (ed.), The Second Language Curriculum in Action. Sydney, Australia: NCELTR
    • Brock Cj.. (1986), "The effects of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse" . TESOL Quarterly 20/1: 47-59
    • Brooks N. (1960), Language and Language Learning. Second Edition. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World
    • l3rophy J.E. (1982), "how teachers influence what is taught and learned in classrooms". The Elementary School Journal 83/1: 1-13
    • Brophy J. & Good Th. (1974), Teacher- Student Relationships: Causes and Consequences. New York, London: loll-Rinehart-Winston
    • Brown J.D. (1989), "Language program evaluation: A synthesis of existing possibilities" in Johnson R.K. (ed.), The Second Language Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    • Brown S. (1980), "Key issues in the implementation of innovations in schools". Curriculum 1/1:32-39
    • Brown S. & McIntyre D. (1978). "Factors influencing teacher responses to curricular innovations". Research Intelligence 4/1: 19-23
    • I3rumfit C.J. (1979), "Communicative language teaching: An educational perspective" in Brumfit C.J. & Johnson K. (eds.), The Communicative Approach to Language Teaching Oxford: Oxford University Press
    • Brumfit C.J. (1986), "The teacher's role in communicative teaching" in Freudenstein R. & James C.V. (eds.), Confidence through Competence in Modern Language Learning. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research
    • l3rumfit C.J. & Mitchell R. (1988), "Research in Applied linguistics relevant to language teaching: 1987". Language Teaching 21/2: 141-145
    • Bruton A. Samuda V. (1980), "Learner and teacher roles in the treatment of oral error in group work". RELC Journal 11: 49-63
    • Burgess R.G. (1982), "Multiple strategies in field research" in Burgess R.G. (ed.), Field Research: A Sourcebook and Field Manual. London & N.Y.: Routledge
    • Burns A. (1990), "Focus on language in the communicative classroom" in Brindley G. (ed.), The Second Language Curriculum in Action. Sydney, Australia: NCELTR
    • Burt M.K. & Kiparsky C. (1974), "Global and local mistakes" in Schumann J.ii. & Stenson N. (eds.), New Frontiers in Second Language Learning. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury house
    • Butcher 11. J. (1965), "Attitudes of student teachers to education. A comparison with the attitudes of experienced teachers and a study of changes during the training COUfSC" . British Journal of Sociolinguistic Psychology 4: fl-^4
    • Canale M. & Swain M. (1980), "Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing". Applied Linguistics 1: 1-47
    • Candlin C.N. & Breen M.P. (1979), "Evaluating, adapting and innovating language teaching materials" in Yorio C., Perkins K. & Schachter J. (eds.), On TESOL '79: The Learner in Focus. Washington I).C.: TESOL
    • Carisen W.S. (1991), "Questioning in classrooms: A sociolinguistic perspective". Review of Educational Research 61/2: 157-178
    • Cazden C.B. (1986), "Classroom discourse" in Wittrock M.C. (ed.), handbook of Research on Teaching. 'Third Edition, London: Macmillan
    • Cazden C.B. (1987), "Relationships between talking and learning in classroom interaction" in Das B.K. (ed.), Patterns of Classroom Interaction in Southeast Asia. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre
    • Charalambakis 1). (1993), Questionnaire Analysis. Computer program for the analysis of questionnaire data
    • Chaudron C. (1977a), "A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners' errors". Language Learning 17: 29-46
    • Chaudron C. (1987) , "I1e role of error correction in second language teaching" in 1)as B.K. (ed.), Patterns of Classroom Interaction in Southeast Asia. Singapore: SEAM EO regional Language Centre
    • Chaudron C. (1991), "Validation in second language classroom research: 'The role of observation" in Phillipson R., Kdllerman E., Seinker L., Sharwood Smith M. & Swain M. (eds.), Foreign ISccond Language Pedagogy Research. Clevedon, Philadelphia: Multilingual Mailers
    • ('homsky N. (1965), Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT
    • Chrislidis Ch. (1991), "Lime for decentralisation". VIMA (Greek Sunday newspaper) Sunday February 3, 1991
    • Chryshochoos i.E. (1990), The Role of the Theories of Language and Language learning in the Pre-Service and in-Service Training, Education, and Development of Language Teachers. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Durham
    • Cohen A.I). (1975), "Error correction and the training of language teachers". Modern Language Journal 59: 414-422
    • Cole R.A. & Williams l).M. (1 973), "Pupils' responses to teacher questions: Cognitive level, length and syntax". Educational Leadership 31: 142-145
    • Corder S.l'. (1974), "The significance of learners' errors" in Richards J.C. (ed.), Error Analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. London: Longman
    • Coulihard M. (1977), An Introduction to l)iscourse Analysis. London: Longman
    • I)elamont S. & hamilton 1). (1986), "Revisiting classroom research: A continuing cautionary tale" in hlarnmerslcy M. (ed.), Controversies in Classroom Research. Milton Keynes: Open University Press
    • I)endrinos H. (ed.) (1983), 'Feacher Training handbook. Athens: OEI)B
    • Dendrinos B. (1985a), Report on the E1.T Project in Greece. Athens: OEDB
    • I)endrinos B. (1985b), The ELT Guide Athens: OE1)13
    • l)ubin F. & Olshtain F. (1986), Course Design. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
    • I)unkin M.J. & Diddle B.J. (1974), The Study of Teaching. New York: Ilolt,Rinehart & Winston
    • Early P. & I3olitho R. (1982), "Reasons to be cheerful: or helping teachers to get problems into perspective" in ELT Documents 110: Focus on the Teacher. London: British Council
    • Finlayson D. & Quirk S. (1979), "Ideology, reality assumptions and teachers' classroom decision-making" in Eggleston J. (ed.), Teacher DecisionMaking in the Classroom. I .ondon: Routledge & Kegan Paul
    • Fishbein M.& Ajzen J. (1975), Belief, Attitude, intention and Behaviour. An introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley
    • Freeman I). & Richards J.C. (1993), "Conceptions of teaching and the education of Second language teachers". TESOL Quarterly 25/2: 193-216
    • Freire P. (1975), "Pedagogy of the oppressed" in Gotby M., Greenwald J. & West R. (eds.), Curriculum Design. London: Croom helm in association with the Open University.
    • Frohhch M., Spada N., & Allen P. (1985), "Differences in the communicative orientation of 12 classrooms". TESOL Quarterly 19/1: 27-57
    • Goody E.N. (1978), "Towards a theory of questions" in Goody EN. (ed.), Questions and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    • [farmer J. (1982), "What is communicative?". English Language Teaching Journal 36/3: 164-168
    • henderson ES. (1975), "Attitude change in in-service education". British Journal of In-Service Education 2/1: 113-116
    • hendrickson J. M. (1987), "Error correction in foreign language teaching: Recent theory, research and practice" in Long M.H. & Richards J. C. (eds.), Methodology in rEsoL. A Book of Readings. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House
    • hloge R.D. (1985), "The validity of direct observation measures on pupil classroom behaviour". Review of Educational Research 5514: 469-483
    • Ilolley F. & King J.K. (1974), "Imitation and correction in foreign language learning" in Schumann J.H. & Stenson N. (eds.) New Frontiers in Second Language Learning. Rowley Mass.: Newbury house
    • Ilolliday A. (1992), "Tissue rejection and informal orders in ELi' projects: Collecting the right information". Applied Linguistics 13/4: 403-424
    • homer D. (1988), "Classroom correction: Is it correct?". System 16/2: 213- 220
    • Long MJ-L & Crookes G. (1992), "Three approaches to task-based syllabus design". TESOL Quarterly 26/1: 27-60
    • Long M.1I. & Porter P.A. (1985), "Group work, interlanguage talk and second language acquisition". lESOL Quarterly 19/2: 207-226
    • Long M.H. & Sato C.J. (1983), "Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers' questions" in Seliger H.W. & Long M.H. (eds.), Classroom Oriented Research in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley Mass.: Newbury house
    • Ludwig J. (1982), "Native speaker judgements of second language learners' efforts at communication: A review". Modern Language Journal 66: 274- 283
    • Marsh Cl. (1986), "Curriculum implementation: An analysis of Australian research studies, 1973-1983". Curriculum Perspectives 6/1: 11-22
    • Wilkins D.A. (1972), "The linguistic and situational content of the common core in a unil/credit system" Ms. Strasbourg: Council of Europe
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article