LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Calefato, Patrizia (2015)
Publisher: Cardiff University Press
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: LB2300, LB2361, LB, LF
The aim of this paper is to analyse the consequences, problems and possible opportunities derived from the absence of Cultural Studies as a specific and autonomous\ud ‘discipline’ in the Italian University, despite its wide diffusion across various academic subjects since the 1970s. I start my analysis from two ‘rupture texts’: Mario Perniola’s relevant essay entitled ‘Chi ha paura degli studi culturali?’ (2000) (‘Who is afraid of Cultural\ud Studies?’) and the website/volume entitled Studi Culturali (2003-2004), edited by Michele Cometa. Both texts focused on what had (not) happened in the Italian University in the\ud last decades of the 20th century and envisioned inter- or alter-disciplinary perspectives for the future. Over just the same period, however, from the late 1990s to the early 2000s,a problem occurred: the Italian university started its structural transformation from the Humboldtian model to the neoliberal model. Thus, is there a possible actua(bi)lity for Cultural Studies in Italy? What resistant pedagogical and interventional practices already exist, and what need to be built in totally different forms? I will try to respond to these questions focusing, above all, on the communicative dimension of the critical method of\ud Cultural Studies, choosing Fashion Theory and Social Semiotics as case studies.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Barthes, R. (1967), Systéme de la Mode, Paris: Seuil; Eng. Trans. The Fashion System, (1983), New York: Hill & Wang.
    • Barthes, R. (2006), The Language of Fashion, Oxford: Berg.
    • Calefato, P. (2004a), 'Fashion Theory' in Cometa, M., ed., Dizionario degli studi culturali, Roma: Meltemi, 194-203. Also available at http://www.culturalstudies.it/dizionario/pdf/fashion_theory.pdf.
    • Calefato, P. (2004b), The Clothed Body, Oxford: Berg.
    • Calvet, L. (1974), Linguistique et colonialisme, Paris: Payot.
    • Chambers, I. (2001), 'Oltre gli studi italianisti', L'Unità.
    • Cometa, M. (2004), Dizionario degli studi culturali, Roma: Meltemi.
    • Dittmar, N. (1976), Sociolinguistics - A Critical Survey of Theory and Application, London: Edward Arnold; It. Trans., Manuale di sociolinguistica, (1978), Roma-Bari: Laterza.
    • Foucault, M. (1970), L'ordre du discourse; Eng. Transl. in Young, R. and Kegan, P. (eds.), (1981), Untying the Text, A Post-structuralist Reader, London: Routledge.
    • Hall, S. (1986), 'Gramsci's Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity' in Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10 (2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019685998601000202
    • Hall, S. (1992), 'Cultural Studies and Its Theoretical Legacies', in Grossberg, L., Nelson, C., Treichler, P. (eds.), Cultural Studies, New York and London: Routledge, 277-294.
    • hooks, b. (1990), Yearning. Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics, Boston: South End Press.
    • Perniola, M. (2000), 'Chi ha paura degli studi culturali?' in Agalma, 1. Available at http://www.uniroma2.it/agalma/aga1edi.html
    • Rossi-Landi, F. (1992), Between Signs and Non-signs, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    • Spivak, G. (1999), A Critique of Postcolonial Reason, Cambridge (Mass.)-London: Harvard University Press.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article