Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Baù, D.; Cody, B.M.; González-Nicolás, A. (2015)
Languages: English
Types: Article
© 2015, Springer International Publishing Switzerland. Successful large-scale implementation of geological CO2 sequestration (GCS) will require the preliminary assessment of multiple potential injection sites. Risk assessment and optimization tools used in this effort typically require large numbers of simulations. This makes it important to choose the appropriate level of complexity when selecting the type of simulation model. A promising multi-phase semi-analytical method proposed by Nordbotten et al. (Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 743–749 2009) to estimate key system attributes (i.e., pressure distribution, CO2 plume extent, and fluid migration) has been found to reduce computational run times by three orders of magnitude when compared to other standard numerical techniques. The premise of the work presented herein is that the existing semi-analytical leakage algorithm proposed by Nordbotten et al. (Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 743–749 2009) may be further improved in computational efficiency by applying a fixed-point-type iterative global pressure solution to eliminate the need to solve large sets of linear equations at each time step. Results show that significant gains in computational efficiency are obtained with this new methodology. In addition, this modification provides the same enhancement to similar semi-analytical algorithms that simulate single-phase injection into multi-layer domains.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • 1. Anderson E., Bai Z., Bischof C., et al.: LAPACK Users Guide: Third Edition. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia. (1999)
    • 2. Avci C.: Evaluation of flow leakage through abandoned wells and boreholes. Water Resour Res 30:2565 2578 (1994)
    • 3. Bachu S., Bennion D.B.: Experimental assessment of brine and/or CO2 leakage through well cements at reservoir conditions. Int J Greenh Gas Control 3:494 501 (2009)
    • 4. Bandilla K.W., Kraemer S.R., Birkholzer J.T.: Using semi-analytic solutions to approximate the area of potential impact for carbon dioxide injection. Int J Greenh Gas Control 8:196 204 (2012)
    • 5. Birkholzer J.T., Cihan A., Zhou Q.: Impact-driven pressure management via targeted brine extraction Conceptual studies of CO2 storage in saline formations. Int J Greenh Gas Control 7:168 18 (2012)
    • 6. Buscheck T.A., Sun Y., Chen M., et al.: Active CO2 reservoir management for carbon storage: Analysis of operational strategies to relieve pressure buildup and improve injectivity. Int J Greenh Gas Control 6:230 245 (2012)
    • 7. Celia M.A., Nordbotten J.M., Court B., et al.: Field-scale application of a semi-analytical model for estimation of CO2 and brine leakage along old wells. Int J Greenh Gas Control 5:257 269 (2011)
    • 8. Chen Z., Huan G., Ma Y.: Computational methods for multiphase flows in porous media. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia. (2006)
    • 24. Hunt B.: Flow to a well in a multiaquifer system. Water Resour Res 21:1637 1641 (1985)
    • 25. Javandel I., Witherspoon P.: A semianalytical solution for partial penetration in two-layer aquifers. Water Resour Res 16:1099 1106 (1980)
    • 26. Juanes R., MacMinn C.W., Szulczewski M.L.: The Footprint of the CO2 Plume during Carbon Dioxide Storage in Saline Aquifers: Storage Efficiency for Capillary Trapping at the Basin Scale. Transp Porous Media 82:19 30 (2009)
    • 27. Kumar N., Bryant S.L.: Semi-analytical model to determine perforation interval for secure CO2 storage in saline aquifers. Energy Procedia 1:3071 3078 (2009)
    • 28. Lacombe S., Sudicky E.: Influence of Leaky Boreholes on Cross Formational Groundwater Flow and Contaminant Transport. Water Resour (1995)
    • 29. Mathias SA, Hardisty P.E., Trudell M.R., Zimmerman R.W.: Approximate Solutions for Pressure Buildup During CO2 Injection in Brine Aquifers. Transp Porous Media 79:265 284 (2008)
    • 30. Neuman S., Witherspoon P.: Applicability of current theories of flow in leaky aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 5: 817- 829 (1969)
    • 31. Nogues J., Court B., Dobossy M., et al.: A methodology to estimate maximum probable leakage along old wells in a geological sequestration operation. Int J Greenh Gas Control 7:39 47 (2012)
    • 32. Nogues J., Nordbotten J., Celia M.: Detecting leakage of brine or CO2 through abandoned wells in a geological sequestration operation using pressure monitoring wells. Energy Procedia 4:3620 3627 (2011)
    • 33. Nordbotten J., Celia M.: Semianalytical solution for CO2 leakage through an abandoned well. Environ Sci Technol 39:602 611 (2005)
    • 34. Nordbotten J., Celia M.: An improved analytical solution for interface upconing around a well. Water Resour Res 42:1 10. (2006a)
    • 35. Nordbotten J., Celia M.: Similarity solutions for fluid injection into confined aquifers. J Fluid Mech 561:307 327. (2006b)
    • 36. Nordbotten, J., Celia M.: Geological Storage of CO2, Wiley. (2012)
    • 37. Nordbotten J., Celia M., Bachu S.: Analytical solutions for leakage rates through abandoned wells. Water Resour Res 40:1 10. (2004)
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article