LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Noyes, Andrew; Adkins, Michael (2016)
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Group
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects:
The UK Government has set a goal that the ‘vast majority’ of students in England will be studying mathematics to 18 by the end of the decade. The policy levers for achieving this goal include new Core Maths qualifications, designed for over 200,000 students who have achieved good grades at the age of 16 but then opt out of advanced or A-level mathematics. This paper reports findings from a cluster-sampled survey of over ten thousand 17-year-olds in England in 2015. Participants’ views on post-16 mathematics are presented and discussed. The main finding is that they are strongly opposed to the idea of compulsory mathematical study, but are less antithetical to being encouraged to study mathematics beyond 16. We consider how attitudes vary by gender, prior attainment, study patterns and future aspirations. The paper considers the implications of these findings in the current policy landscape.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • ACME. (2011). Mathematical needs: mathematics in the workplace and in higher education. London: Royal Society.
    • ACME. (2012a). Post-16 Mathematics: a strategy for improving provision and participation. London: Advisory Committee on Mathematics Education/Royal Society.
    • ACME. (2012b). Post-16 Mathematics: planning for success. London: Advisory Committee on Mathematics Education/Royal Society.
    • Adelson, J., & Mccoach, B. (2010). Measuring the Mathematical Attitudes of Elementary Students: The Effects of a 4-Point or 5-Point Likert-Type Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 796-807.
    • Adkins, M., & Noyes, A. (2016a). Do Advanced Mathematics Skills Predict Success in Biology and Chemistry Degrees? Submited for review to International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.
    • Adkins, M., & Noyes, A. (2016b). Reassessing the economic value of Advanced level Mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 42(1), 93-116.
    • Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Macrea, S. (2000). Choice, Pathways and Transitions Post-16: New Youth, New Economics in the Global City. London: RoutlegeFalmer.
    • Brown, M., Brown, P., & Bibby, T. (2008). "I would rather die": reasons given by 16-yearolds for not continuing their study of mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(1), 3-18.
    • Browne, R., Koenig, J., MacKay, N., Sheldon, N., Sillcot, N., & Wake, G. (2013). Report from the expert panel on Core Maths. London: Advisory Committee on Mathematics Education/Royal Society.
    • CBI. (2009). Stronger together: businesses and universities in turbulent times. London: Confederation of British Industry.
    • Connolly, P. (2006). The Effects of Social Class and Ethnicity on Gender Differences in GCSE Attainment: A Secondary Analysis of the Youth Cohort Study of England and Wales 1997-2001. British Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 3-21.
    • Crawford, C., & Cribb, J. (2013). Reading and maths skills at age 10 and earnings in later life: a brief analysis using the British Cohort Study. Centre for Analysis of Youth Transitions: Institute of Education, University of London.
    • Deloitte. (2012). Measuring the Economic Benefits of Mathematical Science Research in the UK: Final Report. London.
    • DfE. (2014a). Reforming the accountability system for 16 to 19 providers: Government response to the consultation on 16 to 19 accountability. London: Department for Education.
    • DfE. (2014b). The technical baccalaureate performance table measure. London: Department for Education.
    • DfES. (2004). 14-19 Curriculum and Qualifications Reform: final report of the working group on 14-19 reform. London: Department for Education and Skills.
    • Dolton, P., & Vignoles, A. (2002). The return on post-compulsory school mathematics study. Economica, 69(273), 113-142.
    • Educators for Reform. (2010). The Misuse of Mathematics. London: Educators for Reform.
    • Gago, J. M. (2004). Increasing human resources for science and technology in Europe. Brussels: European Commission.
    • Gewirtz, S., Ball, S., & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, Choice and Equity in Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    • Gove, M. (2011). Michael Gove speaks to the Royal Society on maths and science Retrieved 17th December, 2012, from http://www.education.gov.uk/inthenews/speeches/a00191729/michael-gove-speaksto-the-royal-society-on-maths-and-science
    • Hawkes, T., & Savage, M. (1999). Measuring the mathematics problem. London: The Engineering Council.
    • Hodgen, J., McAlinden, M., & Tomei, A. (2014). Mathematical transitions: a report on the mathematical and statistical needs of students undertaking undergraduate studies in various isciplines. York: Higher Education Academy.
    • Hodgen, J., Pepper, D., Sturman, L., & Ruddock, G. (2010). Is the UK an Outlier? London: Nuffield Foundation.
    • Kounine, L., Marks, J., & Truss, E. (2008). The Value of Mathematics. London: Reform.
    • Matthews, A., & Pepper, D. (2007). Evaluation of Participation in A level Mathematics: final report. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
    • Mendick, H. (2005). Mathematical stories: why do more boys than girls choose to study mathematics at AS-level in England? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 235-251.
    • Mendick, H. (2008). Subtracting difference: troubling transitions from GCSE to AS-level mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 34(6), 711-732.
    • Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., Baumert, J., Köller, O., & Garrett, J. (2006). Gender and course selection in upper secondary education: Effects of academic self-concept and intrinsic value. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 323-345. doi: 10.1080/13803610600765687
    • National Academies. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: energizing and employing America for a brighter future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
    • National Science Foundation. (2002). NSF's program for gender equity in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: A brief retrospective 1993-2001 Arlington, VA: NSF.
    • National Strategic Review of Mathematical Sciences Research in Australia. (2006). Mathematics and statistics: critical skills for Australia's Future. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.
    • Noyes, A. (2009). Exploring social patterns of participation in university-entrance level mathematics in England Research in Mathematics Education, 11(2), 167-183.
    • Noyes, A. (2012). It matters which class you are in: student-centred teaching and the enjoyment of learning mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 273- 290.
    • Noyes, A. (2013). The effective mathematics department: adding value and increasing participation? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24(1), 87-103.
    • Noyes, A., & Adkins, M. (2016a). The Impact of Research on Policy: A Case of Qualifications Reform. British Journal of Educational Studies, 1-17. doi: 10.1080/00071005.2016.1159654
    • Noyes, A., & Adkins, M. (2016b). Reconsidering the rise in A-Level Mathematics participation. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications. doi: 10.1093/teamat/hrv016
    • Noyes, A., Drake, P., Wake, G., & Murphy, R. (2010). Evaluating Mathematics Pathways: Final Report, December 2010 Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/standard/publicationDetail/Page1/DFERR143
    • Noyes, A., & Sealey, P. (2012). Investigating participation in Advanced level mathematics: a study of student drop out Research Papers in Education, 27(1), 123-138.
    • Noyes, A., Wake, G., & Drake, P. (2011). Widening and increasing post-16 mathematics participation: pathways, pedagogies and politics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 483-501.
    • Noyes, A., Wake, G., & Drake, P. (2013). Time for curriculum reform: the case of mathematics. The Curriculum Journal, 24(4), 511-528. doi: 10.1080/09585176.2013.812973
    • Roberts, G. (2002). SET for success: The supply of people with science, technology, engineering and mathematics skills. London: Department for Education and Science.
    • Royal Society. (2008). Science and mathematics education 14-19: A 'state of the nation' report on the participation and attainment of 14-19 year olds in science and mathematics in the UK. London: The Royal Society.
    • Royal Society. (2011). Preparing for the transfer from school and college science and mathematics education to UK STEM higher education. London: Royal Society.
    • Smith, A. (2004). Making Mathematics Count. London: The Stationery Office.
    • Smyth, E., & Hannan, C. (2006). School effects and subject choice: the uptake of scientific subjects in Ireland. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(3), 303-327.
    • Sturman, L., Burge, B., Cook, R., & Weaving, H. (2012). TIMSS 2011: mathematics and science achievement in England. Slough: NFER.
    • Swan, M. (2006). Collaborative learning in mathematics: a challenge to our beliefs and practices. London: NIACE.
    • Tripney, J., Newman, M., Bangpan, M., Niza, C., MacKintosh, M., & Sinclair, J. (2010). Subject choices in STEM: factors influencing young people (aged 14-19) in Education London: Institute of Education/Wellcome Trust.
    • Vorderman, C., Budd, C., Dunne, R., Hart, M., & Porkess, R. (2011). A world-class mathematics education for all our young people. Retrieved from http://www.tsmresources.com/pdf/VordermanMathsReport.pdf
    • Wang, M.-T. (2012). Educational and Career Interests in Math: A Longitudinal Examination of the Links Between Classroom Environment, Motivational Beliefs, and Interests. Developmental Psychology, 48 (6), 1643-1657.
    • Watt, H. M. G., Shapka, J. D., Morris, Z. A., Durik, A. M., Keating, D. P., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Gendered Motivational Processes Affecting High School Mathematics Participation, Educational Aspirations, and Career Plans: A Comparison of Samples From Australia, Canada, and the United States. Developmental Psychology, 48 (6), 1594-1611.
    • Williams, J. (2012). Use and exchange value in mathematics education: contemporary CHAT meets Bourdieu's sociology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1), 57-72.
    • Wolf, A. (2011). Review of Vocational Education - the Wolf Report. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/The%20Wolf%20Re port.pdf
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Funded by projects

  • WT

Cite this article