Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Fowler, James (2016)
Publisher: Springer Nature
Journal: Neophilologus
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: P, PC, Linguistics and Language, Literature and Literary Theory
In Lettres philosophiques, Letter XIII is devoted to Locke, as are Letters XIV–XVII to Newton. The ordering of these letters is not adequately explained by comparing the dates of birth or death of the two thinkers. For the Letter on Locke not only precedes but also ‘frames’ those on Newton, in the sense that it provides the reader with a guide through the philosophical intricacies of Letters XIV–XVII. This works in two ways. On the one hand, in order to defend Newton against his detractors Voltaire broadly adopts Locke’s perspective on the relation among words, ideas and things. On the other hand, he subtly and misleadingly grafts Locke’s epistemology onto the Principia, though it differs from Newton’s epistemology in significant respects. For Locke, unlike Newton, holds that we can identify fixed, permanent limits concerning what kind of thing humanity can know of matter and the universe. Voltaire presents Newton’s ideas as though they respected Locke’s limits. However, we can glimpse Voltaire’s own attitude in the final words of Letter XV: ‘Procedes huc, et non ibis amplius’: Voltaire agrees more closely with Locke than Newton concerning the limits of epistemology.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Alembert, J. l. R. (1751). Discours pre´liminaire. In J. l. R. Alembert, & D. Diderot (Eds.), Encyclope´die ou Dictionnaire raisonne´ des sciences, des arts et des me´tiers, 28 vols (1751-1772), vol I (pp. xxvixxvii). Paris: Briasson, David, Le Breton, Durand.
    • de Fontenelle, B. (1728). E´ loge de Monsieur Neuton. Paris: Bibliothe`que royale.
    • Grant, E. (1981). Much ado about nothing: Theories of space and vacuum from the Middle Ages to the scientific revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Guerlac, H. (1981). Newton on the continent. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
    • Hamou, P. (2002). Descartes, Newton et l'intelligibilite´ de la nature. In P. Wagner (Ed.), Les Philosophes et la science (pp. 110-165). Paris: Gallimard.
    • Hedley Brooke, J. (1991). Science and religion: Some historical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Heilbron, J. L. (1982). Elements of early modern physics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    • Iliffe, R. (2007). Newton: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Locke, J. (2004). In R. Woolhouse (Ed.), An essay concerning human understanding. London: Penguin Books.
    • Newton, I. (1687). Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica. London: Jussu Societatis Regiae ac Typis Josephi Streater.
    • Newton, I. (1729). The mathematical principles of natural philosophy. (Andrew Motte, Trans.) (Vols. 2). London: Benjamin Motte.
    • Newton, I. (1957). General scholium. In M. K. Munitz (Ed.), Theories of the universe: From Babylonian myth to modern science (pp. 207-211). New York: The Free Press.
    • Schaffer, S. (2009). Newton on the beach: The information order of Principia Mathematica. History of Science, 47, 243-276.
    • Shank, J. B. (2008). The Newton wars and the beginning of the French enlightenment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Tornelli, G. (1971). The 'weakness' of reason in the age of enlightenment. Diderot Studies, 14, 217-244.
    • Voltaire. (1830). Œuvres comple`tes de Voltaire (Vol. XXV). Paris: Armand-Aubre´e.
    • Voltaire. (1961). Lettres philosophiques. In J. van den Heuvel (Ed.), Me´langes. Paris: Gallimard.
    • Voltaire. (2009). In N. Cronk (Ed.), Letters concerning the English nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • No related research data.
  • Discovered through pilot similarity algorithms. Send us your feedback.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article