Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Fernandez, Antonia; Della Giusta, Marina; Kambhampati, Uma (2015)
Publisher: Elsevier
Languages: English
Types: Article
This paper analyses the relationship between agency and Indonesian women’s well-being. The existing debate on empowerment mostly focuses on agency's instrumental value, how agency benefits development and household/women's welfare. We depart from this debate by considering the intrinsic value of agency for women using the Indonesia Family Life Survey. We measure agency based on the decisions women make within their households. We find the effects of agency are not unambiguously positive. Agency has intrinsic value, seen in its strong relationship to well-being in certain spheres, which is moderated by the 'burden of responsibility' that seems to be felt by decision-makers.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Abadian, S. (1996). Women's autonomy and its impact on fertility. World Development, 24(12), 1793-1809. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(96)00075-7
    • Abrams, K. (1998). From Autonomy to Agency: Feminist Perspectives on Self-Direction. William and Mary Law Review, 40, 805.
    • Adato, M., Brière, B. d. l., Mindek, D., & Quisumbing, A. R. (2003). The Impact of PROGRESA on Women's Status and Intrahousehold Relations. In A. R. Quisumbing (Ed.), Household Decisions, Gender, and Development A Synthesis of Recent Research (pp. 213-218). Washington D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.
    • Agarwal, B. (1997). "Bargaining" and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1-51. doi: 10.1080/135457097338799
    • Anderson, S., & Eswaran, M. (2009). What determines female autonomy? Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Development Economics, 90(2), 179-191.
    • Argyle, M. (2003). Causes and Correlates of Happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (pp. 606). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    • Ashraf, N. (2009). Spousal Control and Intra-Household Decision Making: An Experimental Study in the Philippines. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1245-1277.
    • Basu, K. (2006). Gender and Say: A Model of Household Behaviour with Endogenously Determined Balance of Power. Economic Journal, 116(511), 558-580. doi: 10.1111/j.1468- 0297.2006.01092.x
    • Benda-Beckmann, K. v., & Benda-Beckmann, F. v. (2000). Houses, People and Residence: The Fluidity of Ambonese Living Arrangements. In J. Koning, M. Nolten, J. Rodenburg & R. Saptari (Eds.), Women and households in Indonesia : cultural notions and social practices (pp. 102-141). Richmond, Surrey: Curzon.
    • Bertrand, M., Kamenica, E., & Pan, J. (2013). Gender identity and relative income within households.
    • Bittman, M., England, P., Folbre, N., Sayer, L., & Matheson, G. (2003). When does Gender Trump Money? Bargaining and Time in Household Work. The American Journal of Sociology, 109(1), 186-214.
    • Black, L. (1994). The 'White Negro' revisited: Race and Masculinities in south London. In A. Cornwall & N. Lindisfarne (Eds.), Dislocating masculinity Comparative ethnographies. London: Routledge.
    • Bookwalter, J. T., & Dalenberg, D. R. (2010). Relative to What or Whom? The Importance of Norms and Relative Standing to Well-Being in South Africa. World Development, 38(3), 345-355.
    • Brenner, S. A. (1995). Why Women Rule the Roost: Rethinking Javanese Ideologies of Gender and Self-Control. In A. Ong & M. G. Peletz (Eds.), Bewitching women, pious men : gender and body politics in Southeast Asia (pp. x, 309 p). Berkeley: University of California Press.
    • Bulbeck, C. (1997). Re-orienting Western Feminisms: Women's Diversity in a Postcolonial World: Cambridge University Press.
    • Buttenheim, A. M., & Nobles, J. (2009). Ethnic diversity, traditional norms, and marriage behaviour in Indonesia. Population Studies, 63(3), 277-294. doi: 10.1080/00324720903137224
    • Cassidy, G. L., & Davies, L. (2003). Explaining Gender Differences in Mastery among Married Parents. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(1), 48-61.
    • Clark, A., Knabe, A., & Ratzel, S. (2010). Boon or bane? Others' unemployment, well-being and job insecurity. Labour Economics, 17(1), 52-61. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2009.05.007
    • Cornwall, A., Harrison, E., & Whitehead, A. (2007). Gender Myths and Feminist Fables: The Struggle for Interpretive Power in Gender and Development. Development and Change, 38(1), 1-20.
    • Dasgupta, I. (2001). Gender-biased redistribution and intra-household distribution. European Economic Review, 45(9), 1711-1722.
    • Dawson, G. (2007). Keeping Rice in the Pot: Women and Work in a Transmigration Settlement. In M. Ford & L. Parker (Eds.), Women and work in Indonesia (pp. 41-60). London: Routledge.
    • de Brauw, A., Gilligan, D. O., Hoddinott, J., & Roy, S. (2014). The Impact of Bolsa Família on Women's Decision-Making Power. World Development, 59(0), 487-504. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.02.003
    • Della Giusta, M., Jewell, S. L., & Kambhampati, U. S. (2011). Gender and Life Satisfaction in the UK. Feminist Economics, 17(3), 1-34. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2011.582028
    • Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and Happiness Across the World: Material Prosperity Predicts Life Evaluation, Whereas Psychosocial Prosperity Predicts Positive Feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 52-61.
    • Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (2000). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    • Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94-122.
    • Duflo, E. (2012). Women Empowerment and Economic Development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4), 1051-1079.
    • Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and Happiness: Towards a Unified Theory. The Economic Journal, 111(473), 465-484.
    • Easterlin, R. A., Angelescu, L., & Zweig, J. S. (2011). The Impact of Modern Economic Growth on Urban-Rural Differences in Subjective Well-Being. World Development, 39(12), 2187-2198. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.015
    • Elmhirst, R. (2000). Negotiating Gender, Kinship and Livelihood Practices in an Indonesian Transmigration Area. In J. Koning, M. Nolten, J. Rodenburg & R. Saptari (Eds.), Women and
    • Fast, N. J., Gruenfeld, D. H., Sivanathan, N., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Illusory Control : A Generative Force Behind Power's Far-Reaching Effects. Psychological Science, 20.
    • Felkey, A. J. (2013). Husbands, Wives and the Peculiar Economics of Household Public Goods. European Journal of Development Research, 25(3), 445-465.
    • Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How Important is Methodology for the Estimates of the Determinants of Happiness? The Economic Journal, 114, 641-659.
    • Folbre, N. (1994a). Children as Public Goods. The American Economic Review, 84(2), 86-90.
    • Frankenberg, E., & Thomas, D. (2001). Measuring power: Food Consumption and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute.
    • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics : how the economy and institutions affect well-being. Princeton, N.J. Oxfordshire: Princeton University Press.
    • Friedman, M. (2000). Autonomy, Social Disruption, and Women. In C. Mackenzie & N. Stoljar (Eds.), Relational autonomy : feminist perspectives on automony, agency, and the social self (pp. xi, 314 p). New York ; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Garikipati, S. (2008). The Impact of Lending to Women on Household Vulnerability and Women's Empowerment: Evidence from India. World Development, 36(12), 2620-2642.
    • Greenstein, T. N. (1995). Gender Ideology, Marital Disruption, and the Employment of Married Women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57(1), 31-42.
    • Greenstein, T. N. (2000). Economic Dependence, Gender, and the Division of Labor in the Home: A Replication and Extension. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(2), 322-335.
    • Grob, A. (2000). Perceived Control and Subjective Well-being across Nations and across the Life Span. In E. Diener & E. M. Suh (Eds.), Culture and subjective well-being (pp. [ix], 355 p.). Cambridge, Mass. ; London: MIT Press.
    • Grote, N. K., Bledsoe, S. E., Larkin, J., Lemay, E. P., & Brown, C. (2007). Stress Exposure and Depression in Disadvantaged Women: The Protective Effects of Optimism and Perceived Control. Social Work Research, 31(1), 19-33.
    • Gupta, S. (2006). Her money, her time: Women's earnings and their housework hours. Social Science Research, 35(4), 975-999.
    • Hoddinott, J., & Haddad, L. (1991). Household Expenditure, Child Anthropometric Status and the Intra-household Division of Income: Evidence from the Cote d'Ivoire Woodrow Wilson School Working Paper: Princeton University and Trinity College, Oxford.
    • Hoddinott, J., & Haddad, L. (1995). Does Female Income Share Influence Household Expenditures? Evidence from Cote D'Ivoire. Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics, 57(1), 77-96.
    • Iversen, V. (2003). Intra-household inequality: A challenge for the capability approach? Feminist Economics, 9(2-3), 93-115. doi: 10.1080/1354570032000080868
    • Jejeebhoy, S. J. (2002). Convergence and Divergence in Spouses' Perspectives on Women's Autonomy in Rural India. Studies in Family Planning, 33(4), 299-308.
    • Jiang, S., Lu, M., & Sato, H. (2012). Identity, Inequality, and Happiness: Evidence from Urban China. World Development, 40(6), 1190-1200. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.002
    • Koning, J., Nolten, M., Rodenburg, J., & Saptari, R. (Eds.). (2000). Women and households in Indonesia : cultural notions and social practices. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon.
    • Rammohan, A., & Johar, M. (2009). The Determinants of Married Women's Autonomy in Indonesia. Feminist Economics, 15(4), 31 - 55.
    • Reenen, J. v. (2000). The Salty Mouth of a Senior Woman: Gender and the House in Minangkabau. In J. Koning, M. Nolten, J. Rodenburg & R. Saptari (Eds.), Women and households in Indonesia : cultural notions and social practices. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon
    • Richter, K. (2009). Changes in Subjective Well-Being in Timor-Leste on the Path to Independence. World Development, 37(2), 371-384. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.03.007
    • Rosenfield, S. (1989). The Effects of Women's Employment: Personal Control and Sex Differences in Mental Health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 30(1), 77-91. doi: 10.2307/2136914
    • Rosenfield, S. (1999). Splitting the Difference. In C. Aneshensel & J. Phelan (Eds.), Handbook of the Sociology of Mental Health (pp. 209-224): Springer US.
    • Schroder-Butterfill, E., & Kreager, P. (2007). Gaps in the family networks of older people in three Indonesian communities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 22(1), 1-25. doi: 10.1007/s10823-006-9013-3
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article