Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Souitaris, V.; Maestro, B. M. M. (2010)
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
Languages: English
Types: Article
Subjects: HD
This study focuses on polychronicity as a cultural dimension of top management teams (TMTs). TMT polychronicity is the extent to which team members mutually prefer and tend to engage in multiple tasks simultaneously or intermittently instead of one at a time and believe that this is the best way of doing things. We explore the impact of TMT polychronicity on strategic decision speed and comprehensiveness and, subsequently, its effect on new venture financial performance. Contrary to popular time-management principles advocating task prioritization and focused sequential execution, we found that TMT polychronicity has a positive effect on firm performance in the context of dynamic unanalyzable environments. This effect is partially mediated by strategic decision speed and comprehensiveness. Our study contributes to research on strategic leadership by focusing on a novel value-based characteristic of the TMT (polychronicity) and by untangling the decision-making processes that relate TMT characteristics and firm performance. It also contributes to the attention-based view of the firm by positioning polychronicity as a new type of attention structure.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Ancona DG, Goodman PS, Lawrence BS, Tushman ML. 2001. Time: A new research lens. Academy of Management Review 26(4): 645-663.
    • Ancona, DG, Okhuysen, GA, Perlow LA. 2001. Taking time to integrate temporal Research. Academy of Management Review 26(4): 512-529.
    • Agle BR, Nagarajan NJ, Sonnenfeld JA, Srinivasan D. Does CEO charisma matter? An empirical analysis of the relationships among organizational performance, environmental uncertainty, and top management team perceptions of CEO charisma. Academy of Management Journal 49(1): 161-174.
    • Arndt A, Arnold TJ, Landry TD. 2006. The effects of polychronic-orientation upon retail employee satisfaction and turnover. Journal of Retailing 82(4):319-330 Atuahene-Gima K, Murray J. 2004. Antecedents and outcomes of marketing strategy comprehensiveness. Journal of Marketing 68(4): 33-46.
    • Atuahene-Gima K, Li H. 2004. Strategic decision comprehensiveness and new product development outcomes in new technology ventures. Academy of Management Journal 47(4): 583-597.
    • Baron RM, Kenny DA. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6): 1173-1182.
    • Carpenter MA, Geletkanycz MA, Gerard Sanders Wm. 2004. Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of Top management team composition. Journal of Management 30(6): 749-778.
    • Carpenter MA, Pollock TG, Leary MM. 2003. Testing a model of reasoned risk-taking: Governance, the experience of principals and agents, and global strategy in high-technology IPO firms. Strategic Management Journal 24(9): 830-820.
    • Certo, ST, Lester RH, Dalton CM, Dalton DR. 2006. Top management teams, strategy and financial performance: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4): 813-839.
    • Mintzberg H. 1990. The manager's job: Folklore and fact. Harvard Business Review 68(2): 163-176.
    • Shane S. 1996. Explaining rates of variation in entrepreneurship in the United States: 1899- 1988. Journal of Management 22(5): 747-782.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article