Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Močnik, Špela (2015)
Languages: English
Types: Doctoral thesis
Subjects: JA0071
Cosmopolitan thought in recent scholarship is often used in either a prescriptive or a descriptive manner. It is thus most commonly understood as a research agenda for the prescription of various ethico-political projects or a description of the social and political world beyond national frameworks. In both cases cosmopolitanism seems to be mostly understood as a set of assumptions about the social world. This thesis aims to underline cosmopolitanism’s critical characteristics and its capability to engage with the social world in a critical and therefore transformative manner. There has been relatively scarce scholarship on critical cosmopolitanism, a gap that the thesis closes by focusing on cosmopolitanism’s capacity for critical intervention. In this study, the contribution of cosmopolitanism to critical thought is evaluated and advanced. Possessing an unparalleled ability to understand things and change them in the light of universalism, cosmopolitanism can be explored as a kind of critical theory that has a distinct agenda and normative guidance. In order to achieve this, the thesis looks at a version of critical theory that is in certain respects most akin to cosmopolitanism, that is, Axel Honneth’s critical theory and his theory of recognition, and connects the two in a way that shows both the cosmopolitanism’s possession of critical heory’s main features and its differences from Honneth’s critical theory. It is proposed that cosmopolitanism can be regarded as a critical theory with the concept of recognition as its main framework, but also that it differs from Honneth’s theory in its understanding of world disclosure and holding to more universalist and utopian claims. While cosmopolitanism can be understood as being critical, it can also be used as an enhancement of the existing conceptualisation of recognition relationships through cosmopolitanism’s universalist dimensions.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Adam, B. and van Loon, J. (2000) 'Introduction: Repositioning Risk; the Challenge for Social Theory', in Adam, B., Beck, U. and van Loon, J. (ed.) The Risk Society and Beyond: Critical Issues for Social Theory. London and Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE, pp. 1-31.
    • Alway, J. (1995) Critical Theory and Political Possibilities: Conceptions of Emancipatory Politics in the Works of Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse, and Habermas. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
    • Anderson, J. (2011) 'Situating Axel Honneth in the Frankfurt School Tradition', in Petherbridge, D. (ed.) Axel Honneth: Critical Essays: With a Reply by Axel Honneth. Boston: Brill, pp. 31-57.
    • Anderson, S. C. (2009) Hegel's Theory of Recognition from Oppression to Ethical Liberal Modernity. London and New York: Continuum.
    • Antonio, R. J. (1981) 'Immanent Critique as the Core of Critical Theory: Its Origins and Developments in Hegel, Marx and Contemporary Thought', The British Journal of Sociology, 32(3), pp. 330-45.
    • Appiah, K. A. (2006a) The Case for Contamination. The New York Times Magazine, 1 Jan. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/01/magazine/01cosmopolitan.html (11.07.2015).
    • ---. (2006b) Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
    • Arato, A. and Cohen, J. L. (2010) 'Banishing the Sovereign? Internal and External Sovereignty in Arendt', in Benhabib, S., Tsao, R. T. and Verovšek, P. J. (eds.) Politics in Dark Times: Encounters With Hannah Arendt. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 137-71.
    • Arendt, H. (1968) Men in Dark Times. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
    • ---. (1978) The Life of the Mind: Thinking. London: Secker and Warburg.
    • ---. (1992) Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • ---. (2005) Essays in Understanding, 1930-1954: Formation, Exile, and Totalitarianism. New York: Schocken Books.
    • G. (2009) 'Cosmopolitanism as Hospitality: Cosmopolitanism', Alternatives 34(2), pp. 107-28.
    • Brown, G. W. (2010) 'The Laws of Hospitality, Asylum Seekers and Cosmopolitan Right: A Kantian Response to Jacques Derrida', European Journal of Political Theory 9(3), pp. 308-27.
    • Browne, C. (2008) 'The End of Immanent Critique?', European Journal of Social Theory, 11(5), pp. 5-24.
    • Brun, C. (2010) 'Hospitality: Becoming “IDPs” and “Hosts” in Protracted Displacement', Journal of Refugee Studies 23(3), pp. 337-55.
    • Brunkhorst, H. (2005) Solidarity: From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
    • Burden, T. (2003) 'Utopia', in Outhwaite, W. (ed.) The Blackwell Dictionary of Modern Social Thought. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
    • Burns, T. (2013) 'Hegel, Cosmopolitanism, and Contemporary Recognition Theory', in Burns, T. and Thompson, S. (eds.) Global Justice and the Politics of Recognition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 64-87.
    • Calhoun, C. J. (2002) 'Imagining Solidarity: Cosmopolitanism, Constitutional Patriotism, and the Public Sphere', Public Culture, 14(1), pp. 147-71.
    • Cooke, M. (2004) 'Redeeming Redemption: The Utopian Dimension of Critical Social Theory', Philosophy and Social Criticism 30(4), pp. 413-29.
    • Couton, P. and López, J. J. (2009) 'Movement as Utopia', History of the Human Sciences 22(4), pp. 93-121.
    • Crossley, N. (1996) Intersubjectivity: The Fabric of Social Becoming. London and Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
    • d'Entrèves, M. P. (2000) 'Arendt's Theory of Judgment', in D. Villa (ed.) The Cambridge companion to Hannah Arendt. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 245-60.
    • Dallmayr, F. (2003) 'Cosmopolitanism: Moral and Political', Political Theory, 31(3), pp. 421-42.
    • Duara, P. (2014) 'Abrahamic Faiths and Dialogical Transcendence', in Mason, E. and Bahrawi, N. (eds.) Reading the Abrahamic Faiths: Rethinking Religion and Literature. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 47-60.
    • Fuchs, M. (2000) 'Articulating the World: Social Movements, the Self-Transcendence of Society and the Question of Culture', Thesis Eleven 61(1), pp. 65-85.
    • Fultner, B. (2003) 'Translator's Introduction', in Habermas, J. Truth and Justification. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, pp. vii-xxii.
    • Gadamer, H.-G. (1980) Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermeneutical Studies on Plato. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press.
    • ---. (1992) Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History: Applied Hermeneutics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    • ---. (1998) Praise of Theory: Speeches and Essays. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    • ---. (1999a) 'Friendship and Solidarity', Research in Phenomenology, 39(2009), pp. 3-12.
    • ---. (1999b) Hermeneutics, Religion, and Ethics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    • ---. (2002) The Beginning of Knowledge. New York: Continuum.
    • ---. (2013) Truth and Method. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    • Guyer, P. and Wood, A. W. (1998) 'Introduction', in Kant, I., Guyer, P. and Wood, A. W. (ed.) Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-80.
    • ---. (1997) 'Recognition and Moral Obligation', Social Research 64 (1), pp. 16-35.
    • ---. (2000) 'The Possibility of a Disclosing Critique of Society: The Dialectic of Enlightenment in Light of Current Debates in Social Criticism', Constellations, 7(1), pp. 116-27.
    • ---. (2002) 'Grounding Recognition: A Rejoinder to Critical Questions', Inquiry 45 (4), pp. 499-519.
    • ---. (2004) 'Recognition and Justice: Outline of a Plural Theory of Justice', Acta Sociologica 47(4), pp. 351-64.
    • ---. (2007) Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Oxford: Polity.
    • Karagiannis, N. and Wagner, P. (2013) 'The Stranger in Synagonistic Politics', in Schaap, A. (ed.) Law and Agonistic Politics. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 147-62.
    • Kendall, G., Woodward, I. and Skrbiš, Z. (2009) The Sociology of Cosmopolitanism: Globalization, Identity, Culture and Government. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Kitcher, P. (2006) 'A Priori', in Guyer, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 28-61.
    • Kögler, H. (2011) 'Hermeneutic Cosmopolitanism, or: Toward a Cosmopolitan Public Sphere', in Rovisco, M. and Nowicka, M. (eds.) The Ashgate Research Companion to Cosmopolitanism. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, pp. 226-42.
    • Kompridis, N. (1994) 'On World Disclosure: Heidegger, Habermas and Dewey', Thesis Eleven, 37(1), pp. 29-45.
    • ---. (2011) 'Critical Cosmopolitanism', in Rovisco, M. and Nowicka, M. (eds.) The Ashgate Research Companion to Cosmopolitanism. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, pp. 279-94.
    • W. D. (2000) 'The Many Faces of Cosmo-polis: Border Cosmopolitanism', Public Culture 12(3), pp. 721-48.
    • ---. (2002) 'Cosmopolitanisms', in Breckenridge, C. A., Pollock, S., Bhabha, H. K. and Chakrabarty, D. (eds.) Cosmopolitanism. Durham, N.C. and London: Duke University Press, pp. 1-14.
    • Postone, M. (2004) 'Critique, State, and Economy', in Rush, F. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 165-93.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Download from

Cite this article