Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Byerly, T.R. (2015)
Publisher: Philosophy Documentation Center
Languages: English
Types: Article
Suppose you confront a situation in which you can either promote a good for yourself or a good for someone else, but not both. The present paper argues that it is valuable for your conduct in such circumstances to be regulated by a character trait the possession of which constitutes one way of having one’s life be centered upon others as opposed to centered upon oneself. The trait in question, which we shall call “others-centeredness,” is a disposition to promote goods of others rather than one’s own goods when the values of these goods are equal or incommensurable. We argue that possessing this trait makes one more likely to maximize total value, because in addition to promoting the goods of the other, this trait also promotes goods of interpersonal union. We explain why this conclusion is significant, and we defend our argument for it against several objections.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Delaney, N. 1996. American Philosophical Quarterly 33: 375 405.
    • Driver, Julia. 2001. Uneasy Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Fisher, M. 1990. Personal Love. London: Duckworth. Journal of Philosophy 87: 420-8. Philosophia 34: 417-435.
    • Kagan, Shelly. 1998. Normative Ethics. Boulder: Westview.
    • Kant, Immanuel. 2004. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. and ed. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The
    • New Aristotelianism, ed. John Grego and Ruth Groff, pp.9-24. London: Routledge.
    • - Ratio 26, 2: 53-67. Philosophia.
    • Mussen, P., and N. Eisenberg. 2001. ontext. In Constructive and Destructive Behavior: Implications for Family, School, and Society. Ed. A. C. Bohart and D. J. Stipek, 103 126. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. n The Examined Life: Philosophical Meditations, 68 86. Simon & Schuster.
    • Plantinga, Alvin. 1974. God, Freedom, and Evil. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
    • Pruss, Alexander. 2012. One Body: An Essay In Christian Sexual Ethics. South Bend: Notre Dame University Press. Approach, ed. David Carr. London: Routledge.
    • Scruton, R. 1986. Sexual Desire: A Moral Philosophy of the Erotic. Free Press.
    • Simpson, Thomas W. 2 Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93, 4: 550-569.
    • Solomon, R. C. 1981, Love: Emotion, Myth, and Metaphor. Anchor Press.
    • Solomon, R. C. 1988, About Love: Reinventing Romance for Our Times. Simon & Schuster. Logos 6: 131-50.
    • Swinburne, Richard. 1979. The Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon.
    • Zagzebski, Linda. 2010 Metaphilosophy 41, 1: 41-57.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article