Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:


Or use your Academic/Social account:


You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.


Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message


Verify Password:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Sharkey, A. (2014)
Publisher: Springer Verlag
Languages: English
Types: Article
This paper explores the relationship between dignity and robot care for older people. It highlights the disquiet that is often expressed about failures to maintain the dignity of vulnerable older people, but points out some of the contradictory uses of the word 'dignity'. Certain authors have resolved these contradictions by identifying different senses of dignity; contrasting the inviolable dignity inherent in human life to other forms of dignity which can be present to varying degrees. The capability approach (CA) is introduced as a different but tangible account of what it means to live a life worthy of human dignity. It is used here as a framework for the assessment of the possible effects of eldercare robots on human dignity. The CA enables the identification of circumstances in which robots could enhance dignity by expanding the set of capabilities that are accessible to frail older people. At the same time, it is also possible within its framework to identify ways in which robots could have a negative impact, by impeding the access of older people to essential capabilities. It is concluded that the CA has some advantages over other accounts of dignity, but that further work and empirical study is needed in order to adapt it to the particular circumstances and concerns of those in the latter part of their lives.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Nordenfelt, L. (2004) The Varieties of Dignity, Health Care Analysis, 12, 2, 69-81 Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development. New York: Cambridge University Press Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press.
    • Nussbaum, M.C. (2011) Creating capabilities: the human development approach. Harvard University, Belknap Press
    • O'Brien, Marita, Begley, Emer, Anand, Janet Carter, Killick, Campbell and Taylor, Brian J (2011) A Total Indifference to Our Dignity: Older Understandings of Elder Abuse. Centre for Ageing Research and Development in Ireland. Age Action Ireland. 92 pp.
    • Parkinson, M. (2010) My Year as Dignity Ambassador, http://www.dignityincare.org.uk Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T., Sakamoto, K. , and Tanie, K. (2004) Effects of robot assisted activity for elderly people and nurses at a day service center. Proceedings IEEE, 1780-1788.
    • Wilson, R.S., Krueger, K.R., Arnold, S.,E., Schneider, J.A., Kelly, J.F., Barnes, L.L., Tang, Y., Bennett, D.A., Arch Gen Psychiatry. 64:234-240.
    • Winner, S., (2007) Beam me inside, Scotty! Assisted Living Consult Wolff, J., and DeShalit, A. (2007) Disadvantage. Oxford University Press Van Wynsberghe A. (2012) Designing Care Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article