LOGIN TO YOUR ACCOUNT

Username
Password
Remember Me
Or use your Academic/Social account:

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Or use your Academic/Social account:

Congratulations!

You have just completed your registration at OpenAire.

Before you can login to the site, you will need to activate your account. An e-mail will be sent to you with the proper instructions.

Important!

Please note that this site is currently undergoing Beta testing.
Any new content you create is not guaranteed to be present to the final version of the site upon release.

Thank you for your patience,
OpenAire Dev Team.

Close This Message

CREATE AN ACCOUNT

Name:
Username:
Password:
Verify Password:
E-mail:
Verify E-mail:
*All Fields Are Required.
Please Verify You Are Human:
fbtwitterlinkedinvimeoflicker grey 14rssslideshare1
Costantini, L (2016)
Languages: English
Types: Other
Subjects:
Amongst the many literary products of the Second Sophistic, few are so exuberant and satirical as those by Lucian of Samosata. In the comic dialogue known as the Menippus or Nekyomanteia (‘The Oracle of the Dead’), he narrates the attempt of the Cynic Menippus to consult with the prophet Tiresias in the underworld. In order to descend into Hades, Menippus needs the guidance of the disciples of Zoroaster, the μάγοι, and he finds his guide in Mithrobarzanes, a Chaldean from Babylon (Nec.6). After some preliminary rituals, Mithrobarzanes prepares Menippus for the katabasis by means of a comic disguise: Menippus has to wear a woollen hat, hold a lyre, and gear himself up with a lion skin to pass for Odysseus, Orpheus, or Herakles (Nec.7). With such description, Lucian trivialises the figures of these mythical heroes on the wake of a well-established comic tradition (e.g. Aristoph. Batr.46-7;495-6). In this study, I argue that Mithrobarzanes’ garments (Nec.8) have a comic value as well, and this is due to the fact that he is not a real μάγος, but a Chaldean from Babylon who needs to wear a μαγική στολή (‘Magian stole’) to disguise himself as a μάγος. To support this interpretation, I shall discuss some key passages (i.e. Apul. Apol.25.9-26.6; Philostr. V.A.1.2;1.26; Hist.Alex.Mag. rec.vet. 1.4.3-4;3.30.6; Hsch. s.v. Χαλδαῖοι) clarifying the meaning of μάγος and Χαλδαῖος, and their semantic association with the term γόης (‘enchanter’). This will allow us to understand that, by means of Mithrobarzanes’ costume, Lucian aims to satirise the figure of the Zoroastrian high priests. This study aims, therefore, to shed light on the hilarious connotation of Mithrobarzanes’ disguise as a μάγος, which will enable us to recover an additional farcical note of Lucian’s Nekyomanteia.
  • The results below are discovered through our pilot algorithms. Let us know how we are doing!

    • Anderson, G. 1976. Studies in Lucian's Comic Fiction. Leiden: Brill.
    • Bakhtin, M. 1973. Poetics. Translated by R. W. Rotsel. Ann Arbor: Ardis.
    • Bidez, J. and Cumont, F. 1938. Les mages hellénisés. v.I-II. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
    • Bowie, E.L. 1978, Apollonius of Tyana: Tradition and Reality. In: Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.16.2, pp.1652-99. Philostratus: Writer of Fiction. In: Morgan, J.R. and Stoneman, R. eds. Greek Fiction, pp.181-99.
    • Bompaire, J. 1958. Lucien écrivain. Imitation et création. Paris: De Boccard. ZPE 126, pp.1-12. Reprinted and updated in: Bremmer, J. N. 2008. Greek Religion and Culture, the Bible and the Ancient Near East. LeidenBoston: Brill, pp. 235-48; 353-6. Ancient Necromancy: Fact or Fiction? In: Bielawski, K. ed. Mantic Perspectives: Oracles, Prophecy and Performance. Lublin-
    • De Jong, A. 1997. Traditions of the Magi. Zoroastrianism in Greek and Latin Literature. Leiden-New York-Köln: Brill.
    • Dickie, M. W. 2001. Magic and Magicians in the Greco-Roman World. New York- London: Routledge.
    • Graf, F. 1997. Magic in the Ancient World. Translated by Franklin Philip. Cambridge Mass.-London: Harvard University Press.
    • Hall, J. 1981. . New York: Arno Press.
    • Helm, R. 1906. Lucian un Menipp. Leipzig and Berlin: Teubner.
    • Hodkinson, O. 2011. . Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.
    • Hunink, V. 1997. Apuleius of Madauros Pro Se De Magia (Apologia). v.I-II. Amsterdam: J.C. Gieben.
    • Jones, C. P. 2005. Philostratus. The Life of Apollonius of Tyana. v.I-II. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    • Kaibel, G. 1899. Comicorum Graecorum Fragmenta. Berlin: Weidmann.
    • Kingsley, P. 1994. Greeks, Shamans and Magi. In: Studia Iranica 23, pp.187-198.
    • Lloyd-Jones, H. and Parson, P. 1983. Supplementum Hellenisticum. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.
    • McCarthy, B. 1934. Lucian and Menippus. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    • McLeod, M.D. 1991. Lucian. A Selection. Warminster: Aris & Phillips.
    • Noussia, M. 2006. La Nekyia di Platone e di Cratete Tebano. In: Vetta, M. and Catenacci, C. eds. I luoghi e la poesia nella Grecia antica. Turin:
    • Ogden, D. 2001. Magic, Witchcraft, and Ghosts in the Greek and Roman Worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2007. . The Traditional Tales of Lucian's Lover of Lies. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales. 2007. The Love of Wisdom and the Love of Lies: The Philosophers and Philosophical Voices of Lucian's Philopseudes. In: Morgan, J.R. and Jones M. eds. Philosophical Presences in the Ancient Novel, pp.177-203.
    • Panayotakis, C. 2010. Decimus Laberius. The Fragments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Pike, K.L. 1967. Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behaviour. The Hague-Paris: Mouton & Co.
    • Radt, S. 1985. Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta. v.III. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
    • Rives, J. B. 2004. Aristotle, Antisthenes of Rhodes, and the Magikos. In: RhM 147, pp.35-54. 2009. Apion Peri Magon and the Meaning of the Word Magos. In: Mene 9, pp.119-32. 2010. Magus and its Cognates in Classical Latin. In: Gordon, R.L. and Simón, F. M. eds. Magical Practice in the Latin West. Leiden-Boston: Brill, pp.53-77.
    • Russell, D.A. 1992. Dio Chrysostom. Orations VII, XII and XXXVI. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • Stafford, E. 2012. Herakles. London: Routledge.
    • Stramaglia, A. 1990. Aspetti di letteratura fantastica in Apuleio. Zatchlas Aegyptius propheta primarius e la scena di necromanzia nella novella di Telifrone (Met. 2,27-30). In: AFLB 33, pp.159- 220. Reprinted with updates by Graverini in: Pecere, O. and Stramaglia, A. 2003. Studi Apuleiani. Cassino: Edizioni Università di Cassino, p.61-117; 189-95. Quintiliano]. (Declamazioni maggiori, 4). Cassino: Edizioni Università di Cassino.
  • No related research data.
  • No similar publications.

Share - Bookmark

Cite this article